City · Connecticut
ADU rules in New Britain
These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in New Britain: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.
Rules at a glance
A freestanding backyard cottage is not allowed. Zoning Ordinances Section 270-40-40.290.10.80 requires that an accessory dwelling unit 'be constructed within the building envelope or attached to the existing principal structure with a common wall of at least eight (8) feet in width', so an ADU must be carved out of the house or built as an addition sharing at least 8 feet of wall. New Britain reached this result by opting out of CGS 8-2o on 12-14-2022 (Common Council Item 35947), and the opt-out resolution named the statute's detached allowance as one of its reasons, so the statewide rule that detached accessory apartments be permitted as of right does not reach the city. The City Plan Commission's report on the 2022 ordinance said the intent was to allow ADUs 'as more of a traditional in-law suite that is within or attached to the principal residence'. Reinforcing rules require the unit to share the principal structure's utilities and meters and to carry the same street number.
Zoning Ordinances § 270-40-40.290.10.80 (Approved 11-20-24, Item #36584-3)Attached and interior ADUs are allowed, but only as a special exception use in four residential districts and only on larger lots. Sections 60-20-140 (S-1), 70-20-150 (S-2), 80-20-150 (S-3) and 90-20-10.10 (T) list 'Accessory dwelling unit' among the special exception uses 'permitted, subject to approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 270-40', with site plan review under Section 280-60. Section 270-40-40.290.10.10 adds that ADUs 'shall be constructed only on lots totaling more than eight thousand (8,000) square feet', which is a real gate: the minimum lot area is 8,000 sq ft in S-2 and 6,000 sq ft in both S-3 and T, so a conforming lot in those three districts does not qualify and only S-1 (13,500 sq ft minimum) clears the threshold automatically. No ADU listing appears in the T-6, A-1, A-2, A-3 or any nonresidential district, and Section 30-20-10.10 defines the use as a unit 'subordinate to the primary residence on a single-family home parcel'.
Zoning Ordinances §§ 60-20-140, 70-20-150, 80-20-150, 90-20-10.10; § 270-40-40.290.10.10Section 270-40-40.290.10.40 caps the unit at 'forty (40) percent of square footage of the existing principal structure on parcel or eight hundred (800) square feet; deferring to the lower value', so 800 sq ft is the ceiling and any house under 2,000 sq ft is held below it. Two further caps compound the size limit: Section 270-40-40.290.10.60 allows 'no more than one (1) bedroom', and Code of Ordinances Sec. 25-1 provides that 'At any given time, no more than two (2) persons shall occupy an accessory dwelling unit.' Section 270-40-40.290.10.20 otherwise makes the ADU meet the ordinary dimensional requirements of its district (setbacks, coverage, height). Because New Britain opted out of CGS 8-2o, the statutory floor of the lesser of 30% of net floor area or 1,000 sq ft does not bind it; the local formula is more generous than the state floor for small houses and less generous for large ones.
Zoning Ordinances § 270-40-40.290.10.40, .10.60, .10.20; Code of Ordinances § 25-1Owner occupancy is mandatory and continuing, and it lives in the Code of Ordinances rather than the zoning book. Sec. 25-1 provides that 'No owner of a property may construct and maintain an accessory dwelling unit without claiming one (1) unit on said property as permanent residence', limits the property to one ADU, and requires a signed and notarized affidavit before the certificate of occupancy issues. Compliance is policed annually: the owner 'must submit annually to the zoning department via online permitting system or hand delivery to office a copy of owner's homeowner insurance policy to serve as proof of continued occupancy', and failure exposes the owner to 'enforcement action including, but not limited to, fines and/or demolition order of the subordinate structure/accessory dwelling unit'. CGS 8-2o never prohibited owner-occupancy conditions (they are absent from its subsection (a)(6) list), so this requirement would have survived even without New Britain's opt-out.
Code of Ordinances § 25-1 (Res. No. 35885-2, 12-19-22)Section 270-40-40.290.10.30.10 requires that 'Three (3) off-street parking spaces shall be provided: two (2) spaces per existing principal structure and one (1) space per accessory dwelling unit', so on the books the ADU adds one space to the two the house already owes under the Section 240-20 residential schedule. Section 270-40-40.290.10.30 also bars new access: 'No accessory dwelling unit shall be served by additional curb cuts beyond the existing curb cut in place for the existing principal structure', which on a narrow lot is often the harder constraint. State law has since overtaken the number. Since 07-01-2026 CGS 8-2(d)(9) has provided that zoning regulations shall not 'Require a minimum number of off-street motor vehicle parking spaces for any residential development except as provided in section 8-3n', and new CGS 8-3n permits minimums only for a residential development of more than sixteen dwelling units. A house plus one ADU is nowhere near that threshold, so the three-space requirement is no longer something the city may impose, and CGS 8-3n(a) separately bars rejecting a residential application solely for failure to meet a parking requirement unless the officer or commission finds a specific adverse impact on public health and safety that approval conditions cannot mitigate. The ordinance text still reads three spaces, so ask the Zoning Enforcement Officer how New Britain is applying it.
Zoning Ordinances § 270-40-40.290.10.30 and .10.30.10; § 240-20; constrained by CGS §§ 8-2(d)(9), 8-3n and 8-3o (eff. 07-01-2026)An ADU needs a discretionary special exception from the Zoning Board of Appeals, not staff sign-off. Each district section provides that special exception uses are 'permitted, subject to approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals pursuant to Section 270-40', and Section 270-40-20.20 requires the Board to 'make a specific finding, after a public hearing in the manner provided by law, that such use will not be prejudicial to the character of its neighborhood'. Section 270-40-20.30 further bars any grant 'until the said Board shall have first received and considered an advisory report thereon from the City Plan Commission', which has 30 days to report. Section 270-40-30 layers on eleven general standards, and the site plan goes to review under Section 280-60. This is exactly the discretionary review CGS 8-2o would forbid for as-of-right accessory apartments; New Britain can require it because it opted out on 12-14-2022.
Zoning Ordinances §§ 60-20, 70-20, 80-20, 90-20 and 270-40-10, 270-40-20.20, 270-40-20.30, 270-40-30Renting the ADU on a normal lease is permitted, subject to Code of Ordinances Sec. 25-1: the owner must keep one of the two units on the parcel as a permanent residence, file annual proof of that occupancy, and no more than two people may occupy the ADU. Short-term rental is flatly barred: Zoning Ordinances Section 270-40-40.300.60 provides that 'Accessory dwelling units shall not be used for short-term rentals', where Section 30-20-645 defines a short-term rental as a stay of 'twenty-seven (27) consecutive calendar days or less'. Short-term rentals elsewhere in the city need their own ZBA special exception plus an annually renewed zoning permit under Section 270-40-40.300.10. Nothing in the ordinances allows the ADU to be sold separately from the principal dwelling; it must share the principal structure's utilities, meters and street number.
Zoning Ordinances § 270-40-40.300.60 and § 30-20-645; Code of Ordinances § 25-1The fine print: 11 caveats that can change the picture
- New Britain opted out of CGS 8-2o. The Common Council adopted Item 35947, 'Opt out of C.G.S. 8-2o', on 12-14-2022 (approved by Mayor Erin E. Stewart 12-15-2022), reciting that the Council was 'acting in its power as the Zoning Commission pursuant to §4-3 of the Charter'. The statewide as-of-right accessory apartment regime, its 30 percent / 1,000 sq ft size floor, its one-space parking cap and its ban on discretionary review therefore do not govern here; New Britain's own rules do.
- The rules live in TWO separate Municode books. The zoning standards (use listing, lot size, size cap, parking, siting, screening) are in the Zoning Ordinances at Section 270-40-40.290; the owner-occupancy mandate, the one-ADU-per-property limit, the two-person occupancy cap, the 24-month new-construction delay and the shared-utilities rule are in Code of Ordinances Chapter 25. Reading only one book gives a materially wrong picture.
- Zone dependence is severe. ADUs are a special exception use only in the S-1, S-2, S-3 and T residential districts. They are not listed in T-6, A-1, A-2, A-3, SRD, RO, OP, the business, CBD, TOD-EM/TOD-ES/IHZ or industrial districts.
- The 8,000 sq ft lot gate disqualifies most conforming lots outside S-1. Section 270-40-40.290.10.10 requires lots 'totaling more than eight thousand (8,000) square feet', while the district minimums are 13,500 sq ft (S-1), 8,000 sq ft (S-2) and 6,000 sq ft (S-3 and T). A minimum-size S-2 lot is exactly 8,000 sq ft and so fails the 'more than' test; typical S-3 and T lots fail outright.
- 'Building envelope' is not a defined term. Section 30 contains no definition of the phrase used in Section 270-40-40.290.10.80, so the detached-is-barred reading rests on the paired 'or attached to the existing principal structure with a common wall of at least eight (8) feet in width' alternative, on the City Plan Commission's stated in-law-suite intent, and on the opt-out resolution's objection to the state's detached allowance. An applicant should confirm the Zoning Enforcement Officer's current reading before designing anything freestanding.
- The parking requirement is preempted as of 07-01-2026 even though the ordinance still prints it. Nov. Sp. Sess. P.A. 25-1 rewrote CGS 8-2(d)(9) to bar any minimum off-street parking for residential development 'except as provided in section 8-3n', and CGS 8-3n allows minimums only above sixteen dwelling units. Two related points matter for New Britain specifically. First, CGS 8-2p, the old parking opt-out, was repealed effective 01-01-2026 (P.A. 25-1, S. 53), so there is no longer any opt-out route to preserve a local minimum. Second, CGS 8-3o (effective 07-01-2026) provides that 'any regulations adopted by a municipality pursuant to zoning authority granted by a special act shall comply with the provisions of subdivision (9) of subsection (d) of section 8-2 ... and section 8-3n', which closes the charter and special-act escape hatch that New Britain's 1966 charter-based zoning ordinance might otherwise have offered. The one surviving carve-out is CGS 8-3n(d), which lets a municipality adopt up to two 'conservation and traffic mitigation districts' (each no larger than four per cent of its land area, each submitted to OPM) in which minimums may still be required below sixteen units; no such district appears in any 2026 New Britain agenda, but it is the first thing to re-check.
- CGS 8-2o(g), effective 01-01-2026, can override the opt-out for some owners. Added by Nov. Sp. Sess. P.A. 25-1, S. 13, it lets an owner of property inside a 'transit-oriented district, as defined in section 8-13hh' who has owned it at least three years build an accessory apartment as of right, subject only to structural or architectural requirements. New Britain has NOT adopted an 8-13hh transit-oriented district: its TOD-EM-1/2, TOD-ES-1/2 and IHZ/TOD-1 zoning districts date from 2015 to 2017 and its 'Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Plan' is a planning document, none of them adopted under the 2025 act's machinery, and no transit-oriented district item appears in any 2025 or 2026 Common Council or Zoning Subcommittee agenda. Re-check this first on any future verification, because New Britain is a CTfastrak city with an obvious incentive to designate one.
- Owner occupancy is an ongoing filing obligation, not a one-time attestation. The annual homeowner-insurance submission under Code of Ordinances Sec. 25-1 is easy to miss, and the stated remedy for missing it runs as far as a demolition order for the ADU.
- In the S-1, S-2 and S-3 districts, Code of Ordinances Sec. 25-2 blocks an ADU 'within twenty-four (24) months of a new construction single-family home on the same parcel', except when replacing a building destroyed by fire, flood or other act of God that previously housed an ADU.
- Design and utility conditions that a size-and-parking table would hide: only one bedroom; separate cooking, sanitary and sleeping facilities for the exclusive use of the occupant; mandatory vegetated screening for adjacent-neighbor privacy; connection to the principal structure's utilities and meters; a single street number for house and ADU; and exterior uniformity with the principal structure's siding, trim and casework.
- Currency triggers for re-verification: the Zoning Ordinances book is at Supplement 6 (last codified amendment 10-21-25) and the Code of Ordinances at Supplement 40 (codified through Ordinance No. 37187 of 6-10-2026). Neither Municode product has an ordinance bank enabled (hasOrdbank false for both), so uncodified amendments must be chased through the Granicus agenda archive at newbritain.granicus.com.
Summarized from New Britain's ordinance text, read August 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.
ADU regulations
- library.municode.comOfficial sourceVerified August 2026Municipal Code §270-40-40.290https://library.municode.com/ct/new_britain/codes/zoning_ordinances?nodeId=ZOORNEBRCO_S270THZOBOAP_270-40SPEXUS_270-40-40SPCOSACESPEXUS_270-40-40.290REGOSIPOAMACDWUNA11-20-24IT36584-3
- library.municode.comOfficial sourceVerified August 2026Code of Ordinances, Ch. 25https://library.municode.com/ct/new_britain/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=COOR_CH25ACDWUN
- newbritainct.govOfficial sourceVerified August 2026https://www.newbritainct.gov/gov/boards/zoning-boardhtm
Short-term rental rules
Planning to rent your ADU on Airbnb or VRBO? New Britain regulates short-term rentals separately; check these before counting on nightly rental income.
Connecticut statewide law also applies
Connecticut sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.
See Connecticut statewide rulesSpotted something outdated?
Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or New Britain has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.
Report a correctionReady to build?
Planning an ADU in New Britain?
Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.