City · New Hampshire
ADU rules in Concord
These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Concord: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.
Rules at a glance
Concord repealed its old attached-only ADU rule and re-enacted Section 28-5-52 on October 14, 2025 (Ord. No. 3186, Sec. III) to track the amended state statute. Subsection (b) provides that ADUs, 'which may be either attached or detached, shall be allowed as a matter of right in all zoning districts that permit single-family detached dwellings by right as set forth in Section 28-2-4(k) of this ordinance.' The Table of Accessory Uses carries a matching 'P' for Accessory Dwelling Unit in RO, RM, RS, RN, RD, RH, CN, CVP, IS and UT, exactly the ten districts where a single-family detached dwelling is itself permitted by right, so a detached backyard unit needs no hearing anywhere it is allowed. Two limits survive: the ADU must be accessory to a single-family detached dwelling and cannot go on a lot holding more than one principal dwelling, and manufactured housing may not be used as an ADU.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 28-5-52(b), (c), (d) (Ord. No. 3186, Sec. III, 10-14-25); Table of Accessory Uses, Sec. 28-2-4(k)The same sentence in Section 28-5-52(b) allows attached and internal ADUs as of right in those ten districts. Subsection (g) requires only that an attached ADU have 'either an independent means of ingress and egress or ingress and egress through a common space shared with the principal dwelling,' which replaced the interior-door mandate the state repealed in 2025. Subsection (k) separately allows ADUs converted from existing structures even where the structure already violates setback, lot coverage or height rules, provided the conversion does not worsen the nonconformity, so basement and addition conversions run through the same by-right path as new construction. One labelling wrinkle: since August 31, 2026 a unit built entirely inside a preexisting detached garage or barn is a detached unit under RSA 674:71 as amended, while Concord's Glossary still files it under 'Attached accessory dwelling unit.' Nothing practical turns on which label applies, because subsection (g) is the only attached-only requirement in the section and Concord sets no detached-only standard.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 28-5-52(b), (g), (k) (Ord. No. 3186, Sec. III, 10-14-25); Chapter 28 Glossary, 'Dwelling' (b) and (c) (Ord. No. 3196, Sec. I, 5-11-26); compare RSA 674:71, II and III as amended by 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 210Section 28-5-52(i) states there is 'no minimum floor area requirement for an ADU' and sets the maximum at 950 square feet, matching the state default in RSA 674:72, VII. The cap then scales up for bigger houses: it 'may be increased so that it is either up to fifty (50) percent of the floor area of the principal single-family detached dwelling or one thousand two hundred fifty (1,250) square feet (whichever is less).' A 2,500 square foot house supports the full 1,250 square foot ADU; a small house still gets at least the 950 square foot baseline. Both figures are measured under the Chapter 28 Glossary definition of Floor Area, 'the total gross area on all floors as measured to the outside surfaces of exterior walls, excluding crawl spaces, garages, carports, breezeways, attics without floors, open porches, balconies and terraces.' Concord sets no ADU-specific height or setback standard, and RSA 674:72, I bars it from adding lot size, setback, frontage or design review requirements beyond what the single-family dwelling alone would face.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 28-5-52(i) (Ord. No. 3186, Sec. III, 10-14-25); Chapter 28 Glossary, 'Floor Area'Concord does not require anyone to live on site. Ordinance No. 3186, Sec. III repealed the former Section 28-5-52, which dated from the city's May 2017 response to the original state ADU act, and the twelve subsections of the replacement contain no owner-occupancy or principal-residence clause. Reading the rest of Chapter 28, including the Glossary, the Article 28-2 use tables, Article 28-7 parking and Article 28-9 administration, turns up no such condition either: the only owner-occupant requirement anywhere in the zoning chapter belongs to major home occupations under Sec. 28-5-30. This is Concord's own policy choice rather than state preemption, since RSA 674:72, VI still permits a New Hampshire municipality to require owner occupancy of one of the two units, so neighboring towns may differ.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 28-5-52 in full (Ord. No. 3186, Sec. III, 10-14-25), which contains no owner-occupancy provision; compare RSA 674:72, VISection 28-5-52(j) requires 'a minimum of one parking space ... for the principal single-family detached dwelling unit and one parking space ... for the ADU,' so the pair needs two spaces between them, one per dwelling unit. That is both the ceiling RSA 674:72, IV allows (at most one additional space per accessory unit) and the ceiling RSA 674:16, VII has imposed since September 13, 2025, under which a local legislative body 'shall not require more than one residential parking space per unit.' The general Table of Off-Street Parking Requirements at Section 28-7-2(e) still prints two spaces per dwelling unit for a single-family detached dwelling, but that number is preempted for residential units and does not reach ADUs in any event, because the table lists principal uses only and has no accessory dwelling unit row; on August 19, 2026 the Planning Board voted 8-0-0 to recommend the City Council cut every residential row of that table to one space. Nothing in Chapter 28 requires the space to be covered or garaged, which 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 329 bars municipalities from requiring as of September 13, 2026. The ADU space may be placed at a legally dedicated off-site location, though Concord routes off-site parking through a Planning Board conditional use permit under Section 28-7-11(a).
Code of Ordinances Sec. 28-5-52(j) (Ord. No. 3186, Sec. III, 10-14-25); Sec. 28-7-2(e); Sec. 28-7-11(a); RSA 674:72, IV; RSA 674:16, VII (2025 ch. 188:1 and 258:1, eff. 9-13-2025; garaged-space clause added by 2026 ch. 329:1, eff. 9-13-2026)The Table of Accessory Uses marks Accessory Dwelling Unit 'P' in each of the ten districts where it is listed, and Section 28-2-4(a) defines 'P' as 'a use permitted by right in that district.' No special exception from the Zoning Board of Adjustment and no conditional use permit from the Planning Board is required, which is what RSA 674:72, I has demanded since July 1, 2025. Review is administrative: under Section 28-9-2(b) the Deputy City Manager for Development, or a designee, verifies zoning compliance in conjunction with issuing the building permit, and applications are filed through the city's Citizen Self Service permit portal. The one discretionary step that can surface is off-site ADU parking, which needs a Planning Board conditional use permit.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 28-2-4(a) and Table of Accessory Uses Sec. 28-2-4(k); Sec. 28-9-2(b); Sec. 28-5-52(b)Nothing in Section 28-5-52 or elsewhere in Chapter 28 limits who may occupy an ADU or for how long, and because the October 2025 rewrite dropped owner occupancy a Concord owner may rent out both the house and the ADU. Ownership cannot be split: Section 28-5-52(f) prohibits condominium subdivision and states the principal dwelling, ADU and lot 'shall not be converted to a condominium or any other form of legal ownership distinct from the ownership of the principal single-family detached dwelling.' Section 28-5-52(l) requires the ADU to carry its own address and mail receptacle. We located no short-term rental licensing or registration scheme in Concord's code: a full-text scan of Chapter 15 (licensing of businesses, trades and occupations), Chapter 27 (housing maintenance and occupancy) and Chapter 28 at the current supplement returns no short-term, transient or vacation rental provision, and only rooming houses require a separate permit. Hotels and other lodging facilities remain a distinct use category that is not allowed in the residential districts where ADUs are permitted.
Code of Ordinances Sec. 28-5-52(f), (l) (Ord. No. 3186, Sec. III, 10-14-25); absence of short-term rental provisions in Chapters 15, 27 and 28The fine print: 10 caveats that can change the picture
- District-dependent: ADUs are permitted by right only in the ten districts where single-family detached dwellings are themselves permitted by right (RO Open Space Residential, RM Medium Density Residential, RS Single-Family Residential, RN Neighborhood Residential, RD Downtown Residential, RH High Density Residential, CN Neighborhood Commercial, CVP Civic Performance, IS Institutional, UT Urban Transitional). The Table of Accessory Uses leaves Accessory Dwelling Unit blank in CG, CU, CH, CBP, GWP, OCP, OFP and IN, which are the same districts that do not allow single-family detached dwellings, so this tracks RSA 674:72, I rather than conflicting with it.
- Only one ADU per lot, and only as an accessory to a single-family detached dwelling: Sec. 28-5-52(c) and (d) bar an ADU where more than one principal single-family detached dwelling exists, and require the single-family dwelling to be the only principal use on the lot. Sec. 28-5-52(e) also bars building the ADU first: the single-family dwelling must already exist or be constructed simultaneously with it. Duplexes, townhouses and multifamily buildings get no ADU.
- Manufactured housing may not be used as an ADU (Sec. 28-5-52(b)). The 2025 state amendment deleted the old RSA 674:72, I carve-out that had let municipalities exclude ADUs associated with manufactured housing, so this exclusion is worth watching.
- Local definitions now lag state law, though the old internal conflict is gone. Ord. No. 3196, Sec. I of May 11, 2026 rewrote the Chapter 28 Glossary: it deleted the standalone 'Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)', 'Attached accessory dwelling unit' and 'Detached accessory dwelling unit' entries and the leftover definition of an ADU as a unit 'within or attached to a single-family detached dwelling,' folding all of it into the 'Dwelling' entry at (a), (b) and (c). The consolidated text re-enacted the 2025 statutory wording, so Concord still defines an attached ADU as one 'within or physically connected to the principal dwelling unit, or completely contained within a pre-existing detached structure,' and a detached ADU as one that is neither. 2026 N.H. Laws ch. 210, in force since August 31, 2026, struck exactly that clause from RSA 674:71, II and III, so a unit inside a preexisting garage or barn is a detached unit under state law and an attached one under Concord's Glossary. Nothing practical turns on the mismatch: Sec. 28-5-52(g) is the only attached-only requirement and there is no detached-only standard, so the same by-right path, size cap and one-space parking rule apply either way.
- Off-site parking tension with state law: Sec. 28-5-52(j) lets the ADU space sit off-site but points to Sec. 28-7-11(a), which requires a Planning Board conditional use permit. RSA 674:72, IV says required spaces 'may be provided either on-site or at a legally dedicated off-site location, at the property owner's discretion,' so a homeowner denied the off-site option has a statutory argument.
- Conversion nonconformity limit, re-checked against the amended statute: Sec. 28-5-52(k) allows ADUs converted from existing structures despite nonconforming setbacks, lot coverage or height, but only if the conversion 'does not further increase any existing nonconformities pertaining to setbacks, lot coverage, or height.' RSA 674:72, XI states the conversion right without that qualifier, and 2026 ch. 210 did not add one, so the tension survives. The rest of the comparison favors Concord: the new RSA 674:72, XI(a) sets a floor of structures existing on or before July 1, 2025 while Sec. 28-5-52(k) carries no cutoff date at all, XI(b) expressly permits a city to make the building-permit applicant prove preexisting nonconforming status, which is what Sec. 28-8-2(a) already requires, and XI(c)'s rule that a conversion is not a change of use costing nonconforming status meets no contrary provision in Article 28-8.
- Separate sale is prohibited (Sec. 28-5-52(f)); RSA 674:72, I permits municipalities to bar subsequent condominium conveyance, so this is lawful.
- Overlay districts may add restrictions. Article 28-3 contains no ADU-specific provisions, but Sec. 28-2-4(g) provides that where an overlay and a base district conflict, the more restrictive provision controls, so shoreland, floodplain and similar overlays can still bite.
- Codification currency: the Municode text is codified through Ord. No. 3200, adopted June 4, 2026 (Supp. No. 62, Update 1, posted online August 14 to 19, 2026). Of the ordinances codified since the last check, only Ord. Nos. 3196 (Glossary), 3197 (Sec. 28-5-3), 3198 (Sec. 28-9-3(f)(3)) and 3199 (Sec. 28-4-5), all adopted May 11, 2026, touch Chapter 28, and none amends Sec. 28-5-52 or the use tables, whose section histories still end at Ord. No. 3186 of 10-14-25 and Ord. No. 3188 of 11-10-25 respectively. Concord's Municode product has no ordinance bank, so the Code Comparative Table plus the City Council's Legistar record are the drift detectors; no ordinance of any kind has been introduced since June 30, 2026 and no Council or Planning Board item through September 6, 2026 touches ADUs.
- Pending and not yet law: on August 19, 2026 the Planning Board voted 8-0-0 to recommend that the City Council adopt a rewrite of Article 28-7 that cuts every residential parking minimum from two spaces to one per dwelling unit to match recent state law, shifts most design standards into the Site Plan Regulations, replaces variances with Planning Board conditional use permits as the relief route, and adds accessory dwelling units to the uses exempt from the rule against backing into a street. No Council introduction had been posted as of September 6, 2026; the next Council public hearings are September 14, 2026 and the next Planning Board meeting is September 16, 2026. None of it changes the ADU parking standard in Sec. 28-5-52(j), which already requires one space per unit.
Summarized from Concord's ordinance text, read September 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.
ADU regulations
- library.municode.comOfficial sourceLive September 2026Code of Ordinances §28-5-52https://library.municode.com/nh/concord/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TITIVZOCO_CH28ZOOR_ART28-5SUST_28-5-52ACDWUNAD
- library.municode.comOfficial sourceLive September 2026Code of Ordinances §28-2-4https://library.municode.com/nh/concord/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeId=TITIVZOCO_CH28ZOOR_ART28-2ZODIALUS_28-2-4ALPRACUSZODI
- concordnh.govOfficial sourceVerified September 2026https://www.concordnh.gov/1905/Building-Applications-Fees
New Hampshire statewide law also applies
New Hampshire sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.
See New Hampshire statewide rulesSpotted something outdated?
Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Concord has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.
Report a correctionReady to build?
Planning an ADU in Concord?
Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.