City · West Virginia

ADU rules in Weirton

3 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Weirton: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Conditional

Weirton's Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) defines an accessory dwelling unit as a smaller, independent unit on the same lot as a detached single-family dwelling that may be attached or detached. Table 1 lists it as an accessory use (A) in R-3, MU and the Pennsylvania Avenue Development Overlay District (PADOD) but as a conditional use (C) in R-1 and R-2, which hold about 73 percent of the city's zoned parcels (8,882 of 12,145 in the city's zoning GIS layer), so most homeowners need a Board of Zoning Appeals Conditional Use permit after a public hearing. A detached ADU is also barred on a lot that has a separate detached garage, although an ADU may be built as a second story over a detached garage if it is no taller than the house (§10.01(B)). ADUs are not listed in C-1, C-2, M-1 or M-2. From January 1, 2027, W. Va. Code §8-42-2(a) and (b) require one attached, detached or internal ADU by right on every lot with a single-family dwelling, which invalidates the R-1 and R-2 hearing requirement to the extent of the conflict.

Weirton UDO §2.03 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), §9.05 and Table 1 Permitted Land Use Table (p. 97), §10.01(B) (as amended through Ord. 2266, Dec. 2025); W. Va. Code §8-42-2(a), (b) and §8-42-3(c)
Attached or internal ADU
Conditional

The same Table 1 row governs attached units: an ADU attached to the house is an accessory use in R-3, MU and the PADOD overlay and needs a Board of Zoning Appeals Conditional Use permit in R-1 and R-2. The UDO definition names attached and detached units; it does not separately mention internal conversions such as a basement apartment, which staff would presumably treat as attached. The same §10.01 limits (one ADU per lot, two bedrooms, size ratios) apply. From January 1, 2027, W. Va. Code §8-42-2(a) and (b) make an attached, detached or internal ADU a by-right use on every lot with a single-family dwelling.

Weirton UDO §2.03 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), Table 1 Permitted Land Use Table (p. 97), §10.01(A); W. Va. Code §8-42-2(a), (b) and §8-42-3(c)
Maximum size
50% of the house's floor area and 40% of its footprint, capped at 800 sq ft (R-3, MU) or 1,200 sq ft (R-1, R-2); max 2 bedrooms; no taller than the house or two stories

Under §10.01(C) the ADU's gross floor area may not exceed 50 percent of the principal building's floor area, and its footprint (counting patios but not porches) may not exceed 40 percent of the principal residence's footprint. §10.01(D) adds absolute caps of 800 sq ft in R-3 and MU and 1,200 sq ft in R-1 and R-2, counting only the ADU's living area; the 1,200 figure binds only for houses of 2,400 sq ft or more, and the PADOD overlay gets no stated figure. The ADU may have at most two bedrooms (§10.01(A)) and may not exceed two stories or the height of the house, whichever is less (§10.01(F)); Table 2 separately caps residential accessory structures at 15 ft. From January 1, 2027, W. Va. Code §8-42-2(c) protects an attached or detached ADU up to 75 percent of the house's gross floor area or 1,000 sq ft, whichever is less, and §8-42-2(d)(6) and (d)(7) bar height standards stricter than the house's and more onerous development standards, so the 50 percent ratio, the 40 percent footprint ratio, the 800 sq ft cap and the height limits are likely invalid to the extent they are tighter.

Weirton UDO §10.01(A), (C), (D), (F) (p. 103) and Table 2 Development Standards (pp. 126-128); W. Va. Code §8-42-2(c), (d)(6), (d)(7) and §8-42-3(c)
Owner occupancy
Not required

Nothing in the UDO's ADU definition or §10.01 requires the owner to live in the house or the ADU, and a full-text search of the December 2025 UDO finds owner occupancy required only for bed and breakfast inns (§10.04(C)), not ADUs. In R-1 and R-2 the Board of Zoning Appeals may attach additional reasonable conditions to a Conditional Use permit (§3.06(A)(2)), so a case-specific condition cannot be ruled out there. West Virginia's ADU article (W. Va. Code §8-42) does not preempt owner-occupancy rules, but from January 1, 2027 a municipality may not require a restrictive covenant concerning an ADU (§8-42-2(d)(8)).

Weirton UDO §2.03 (Accessory Dwelling Unit), §10.01, §3.06(A)(2), §10.04(C); W. Va. Code §8-42-2(d)(8)
Extra parking
None (existing required parking for the house must be kept or replaced on site)

§10.01(G) states that no additional parking is required for an ADU, and Table 3 repeats "No additional spaces required" for the use; parking required for the primary dwelling (2 spaces for a single-family dwelling under Table 3) must be maintained or replaced on site. The 2021 UDO's parking table had demanded 1 space for an ADU despite the same no-parking clause; the 2024 rewrite (Ord. 2232) removed that conflict. This already complies with W. Va. Code §8-42-2(d)(1), which bars additional parking or fees in lieu.

Weirton UDO §10.01(G) (p. 103) and §12.11 Table 3 Off-Street Parking Requirements (p. 142); W. Va. Code §8-42-2(d)(1)
Approval process
Varies by type

In R-3, MU and the PADOD overlay an ADU is an accessory use that needs only a zoning and building permit with a Type I administrative site plan review by the Planning Director (§4.02(D)(1), (E)). In R-1 and R-2 it is a conditional use: the applicant files a Conditional Use application with a surveyed site plan, the city publishes a Class I legal notice at least 15 days ahead, and the Board of Zoning Appeals decides after a public hearing and may impose conditions (§3.06, §4.02(F), §6.01, §6.02(B)). The process is live: the February 3, 2026 Board of Zoning Appeals agenda carried a Conditional Use request for an ADU at 324 Sunrise Drive, an R-1 parcel. From January 1, 2027, W. Va. Code §8-42-1 and §8-42-2(a) require approval by right without a public hearing or conditional use permit, so the R-1 and R-2 hearing route becomes invalid to that extent; the state also caps the ADU application fee at $250 plus usual building fees (§8-42-3(b)).

Weirton UDO §9.05(G)-(I) and Table 1 (p. 97), §3.06 (pp. 51-53), §4.01, §4.02(D)-(F) (p. 61), §6.01-6.02; Board of Zoning Appeals agenda, Feb. 3, 2026, item 6(a); W. Va. Code §8-42-1, §8-42-2(a), §8-42-3(b), (c)
Rental restrictions
No ADU-specific rental limit; any rental unit needs a city rental certificate of use and occupancy; short-term rentals are not addressed by the zoning code

The UDO places no rental, tenancy or separate-sale restriction on ADUs, so long-term rental of either unit is allowed. Codified Ordinances Article 1790 bars renting any dwelling unit without a three-year certificate of use and occupancy issued after a Code Official inspection ($20 per unit inspection), with newly constructed rental units exempt for their first five years after the certificate of occupancy (§1790.04, §1790.07, §1790.09(A), §1790.10). Short-term rental is not defined or listed in the UDO; a building offering lodging to transient guests fits the UDO's "Hotel" definition, permitted only in C-1 and C-2, and §9.04(A) prohibits unlisted uses unless the Planning Commission finds them consistent with the ordinance, so nightly rental of an ADU in a residential district is unsettled and should be confirmed with Planning and Development. W. Va. Code §8-42-3(a) leaves short-term rental regulation to the city.

Weirton UDO §2.03 (Hotel), §9.04(A), Table 1 (p. 99), §10.01; Weirton Codified Ordinances §1790.03, §1790.04, §1790.07, §1790.09, §1790.10 (Ord. 2084, 7-8-2019); §797.02; W. Va. Code §8-42-3(a)
The fine print: 9 caveats that can change the picture
  • DATED RE-VERIFICATION TRIGGER, 2027-01-01: W. Va. Code §8-42-3(c) invalidates conflicting local ADU rules from this date. Weirton's UDO (unamended for ADUs through the October 13, 2026 council agenda) conflicts in several ways: the Conditional Use permit and Board of Zoning Appeals hearing required in R-1 and R-2 (by right required by §8-42-1 and §8-42-2(a)); the 50 percent floor-area ratio, 40 percent footprint ratio and 800 sq ft cap in R-3 and MU (likely invalid against the 75 percent or 1,000 sq ft protection in §8-42-2(c) and the bar on more onerous standards in (d)(7)); the rule that the ADU match the house's roof pitch, siding and window projections (barred outside historic districts by (d)(2)); the height limits of two stories or the house's height and the 15 ft accessory-structure height (more restrictive than the 35 ft house limit, barred by (d)(6)); and probably the two-bedroom cap and the ban on a detached ADU beside a detached garage. Parking (none required) and owner occupancy (none required) already comply. Re-check for a conforming UDO text amendment, which would go through the Planning Commission and two council readings.
  • Zone-dependent process: ADUs are an accessory use (administrative Type I site plan review) in R-3, MU and the PADOD overlay but a conditional use with a Board of Zoning Appeals public hearing in R-1 and R-2, which cover about 73 percent of zoned parcels. They are not listed in C-1, C-2, M-1 or M-2. Check the parcel's district on the city's interactive zoning map before applying.
  • §10.01(B): a separate detached ADU is not allowed on a lot that also has a separate detached garage; the ADU may instead be built as a second story over a detached garage if the combined structure is no taller than the house. §12.06(A)(1) also limits a lot to one principal residential building and no more than two structures except as the UDO provides, and Table 2 note (a) requires accessory structures to sit behind the rear wall of the house (3 ft side and rear setbacks in residential districts, 10 ft from a rear alley when vehicle-accessed).
  • Height ambiguity: Table 2 caps accessory structures at 15 ft in R-1, R-2, R-3 and MU, while §10.01(F) and (B) cap an ADU only at two stories or the height of the house; the UDO does not say which governs a detached ADU, though §10.01(B)'s garage-apartment allowance implies the ADU-specific rule.
  • Size math: the 50 percent of floor area and 40 percent of footprint ratios usually bind before the absolute caps; for example a 1,400 sq ft house allows at most a 700 sq ft ADU. §10.01(D) names no absolute cap for the PADOD overlay.
  • Design rule: §10.01(E) requires the ADU's roof pitch, siding and window projections to be identical to the house's. No historic district preservation ordinance was found in the UDO or the Codified Ordinances, so the historic-district exception in W. Va. Code §8-42-2(d)(2) does not appear to shelter this rule after 2026.
  • Short-term rentals are not addressed in the UDO; a transient lodging use matches the UDO's Hotel definition (C-1 and C-2 only) and unlisted uses are prohibited unless the Planning Commission finds otherwise (§9.04(A)), so nightly rental of an ADU needs a city interpretation. The 6 percent city hotel occupancy tax is not levied on hotels with fewer than three rooms (§797.02), and Article 1790 rental certificates apply to rental dwellings occupied for one night or more, although §1790.02(A) excludes 'other transient residential occupancies' from its scope.
  • Code-platform lag: American Legal (Codified Ordinances, 2025 S-18, 'Current with Ordinances passed through 6-9-2025') codifies only the adoption-by-reference section §1301.01, which still names the UDO 'dated September 9, 2024' (Ord. 2232). The operative text is the city-hosted UDO PDF, amended December 2025 by Ord. 2266 (billboard rules only). An aggregator claim that Weirton does not allow ADUs is wrong; the UDO has allowed them since the 2021 UDO (Ord. 2155).
  • RENTAL PREEMPTION, UNTESTED: W. Va. Code §8-1-5a(k) (2019 SB 4, effective 6-7-2019) provides that 'Municipalities may not prohibit or effectively limit the rental of a property, in whole or in part, or regulate the duration, frequency, or location of such rental, in whole or in part', while allowing rules on rental activities that apply uniformly to all properties and the hotel occupancy tax. Weirton participates in the Municipal Home Rule Program (Home Rule Board 2025 summary report). Whether the subsection reaches ordinary zoning rules is unsettled: it sits in the home rule section, and the Home Rule Board's 1-21-2021 policy limits the duty to conform ordinances to those enacted under an approved home rule plan while defining 'effectively limit' as 'producing a restraint or hindrance'. Local limits on renting an ADU or on short-term rentals are recorded here as written but may be open to challenge under it.

Summarized from Weirton's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Weirton with 10 nearby cities

ADU regulations

West Virginia statewide law also applies

West Virginia sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See West Virginia statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Weirton has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Weirton?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.