City · Washington

ADU rules in Spokane Valley

4 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Spokane Valley: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Allowed

A detached backyard ADU is allowed outright, with no hearing and no discretionary review. The permitted use matrix marks 'Dwelling, accessory units' with an 'S' in R-1, R-2, R-3 and R-4 and in the MU, CMU, NC, RC and IMU zones, and SVMC 19.60.040(D) defines 'S' as allowed subject to the supplemental regulations of Chapter 19.65 SVMC, which for ADUs simply send the applicant back to Chapter 19.40 SVMC. Only one ADU is allowed per lot, attached or detached, so a detached unit consumes the lot's single allowance. An existing detached accessory structure such as a garage may be converted into a detached ADU provided every standard is met, including the setbacks. Two gaps are worth knowing: ADUs are not allowed at all in the MFR zone even though single-family dwellings are permitted there, and no ADU may be placed on a lot that already holds a duplex, a multifamily dwelling or an accessory apartment inside the principal structure.

SVMC 19.60.050 (permitted uses matrix, 'Dwelling, accessory units'); SVMC 19.60.040(D); SVMC 19.65.130(B); SVMC 19.40.030(A)(2), (C)(3), (C)(4)
Attached or internal ADU
Allowed

Attached and internal ADUs run through the same permitted use matrix row and the same Type I administrative permit as detached ones; the SVMC defines an accessory dwelling unit as 'a freestanding detached structure or an attached part of a structure' and Chapter 19.40 SVMC sets one shared set of standards. There is no minimum house size and no lot-size gate for an attached unit. Two rules bite specifically on attached and internal conversions: the entrance must be on the side or rear of the structure, or otherwise unobtrusive when viewed from the front of the street, and only one entrance may sit on the facade of the primary dwelling; and the 50 percent size cap has no exception for converting existing basement or attic space, so a small house yields a very small internal unit. Because only one ADU is allowed per lot, an attached unit rules out a detached one on the same property.

SVMC 19.60.050; SVMC 19.40.030(A)(2), (B)(2), (B)(3); Appendix A SVMC ('Dwelling, accessory unit')
Maximum size
50% of the primary dwelling's habitable square footage, with a 300 sq ft minimum and a two-bedroom cap. The footprint may not exceed the greater of 10% of the lot area or 1,000 sq ft. Height follows the zone's dwelling limit, 35 ft in R-1 through R-4.

The 50 percent rule is the binding constraint on almost every lot: a 1,400 sq ft house supports at most a 700 sq ft ADU, and a 1,000 sq ft house at most 500 sq ft. The footprint test in SVMC 19.40.030(B)(4) is far more generous and rarely governs, and because it reads 'whichever is greater' it overrides the tighter general accessory structure footprint rule of SVMC 19.65.130(A)(1) under the conflict clause in SVMC 19.40.020(A). Note that 'habitable square footage' is not defined anywhere in the SVMC, including Appendix A, so how the base figure is measured is a staff interpretation. Chapter 19.40 SVMC sets no separate ADU height limit, so the underlying zone's 35 ft dwelling height in Table 19.70-1 applies, and the unit still counts inside the zone's lot coverage cap of 30 percent in R-1, 50 percent in R-2 and R-3 and 60 percent in R-4. The two-bedroom cap in SVMC 19.40.030(B)(5) is a hard limit regardless of size.

SVMC 19.40.030(B)(3), (B)(4), (B)(5); SVMC 19.40.020(A); SVMC 19.65.130(A)(1); Table 19.70-1
Owner occupancy
Required

Spokane Valley still enforces a full, ongoing owner occupancy requirement, one of the last in the Spokane area. The titleholder must occupy either the primary dwelling or the ADU as their permanent residence for six months or more of each calendar year and may at no time receive rent for the owner-occupied unit, and the application must include a letter from the owner affirming that one legal titleholder lives in one of the units. The obligation does not end at approval: before occupancy is issued, a deed restriction is recorded with the Spokane County Auditor noting the presence of the ADU, the owner occupancy requirement and the other maintenance standards, and approval may be revoked if the unit falls out of compliance. The city's application form adds a notarized affidavit in which the owner certifies a 50 percent or greater interest in the property and continued occupancy of one of the two units, and warns that a buyer who intends to keep renting the ADU must file a new Certification of Owner Occupancy within one year of transfer. An owner may cancel an ADU's registration by filing a letter with the county auditor.

SVMC 19.40.030(D)(1), (D)(2), (D)(4), (D)(5); City of Spokane Valley Accessory Dwelling Unit application, Parts IV and V
Extra parking
1 additional off-street space for the ADU, paved, on top of the 2 spaces required for the house, so 3 on a typical single-family lot. No transit-proximity exemption.

SVMC 19.40.030(A)(3) requires one off-street parking space for the ADU in addition to the parking required for the primary dwelling unit, and Table 22.50-1 confirms both halves: 'Dwelling, accessory units, 1 per dwelling unit' and 'Dwelling, one- and two-family, townhouse, 2 per dwelling unit.' The space must be paved with asphalt or Portland cement, although grasscrete, paver blocks or an equivalent hard surface may be used for residential driveways and parking areas. The 25 percent reduction for sites within half a mile of a frequent transit route in SVMC 22.50.020(A)(9) applies only to nonresidential projects, so proximity to a transit line buys an ADU nothing; the only relief is the discretionary reduction of up to 25 percent that the city manager or designee may grant under SVMC 22.50.020(A)(7) on a written request demonstrating site conditions that prevent compliance. The city's ADU application site plan asks the applicant to mark the two existing required stalls and the one proposed paved stall.

SVMC 19.40.030(A)(3); Table 22.50-1; SVMC 22.50.020(A)(6), (A)(7), (A)(9)
Approval process
Permitted use

Purely administrative. Table 17.80-1 classifies 'Accessory dwelling units' under Chapter 19.40 SVMC as a Type I application, and SVMC 17.80.020(A) defines Type I procedures as those that 'apply to permits and decisions issued administratively.' There is no public hearing, no neighbor notice and no discretionary approval criteria. The applicant files the city's Accessory Dwelling Unit application with a labeled floor plan, a site plan showing parcel dimensions, all existing and proposed structures, the ADU entry and the required parking stalls, and a description of the exterior design, plus a notarized affidavit of ownership and occupancy; the Planning Division signs the decision block and staff records the deed restriction with the Spokane County Auditor. Building permits are handled separately under SVMC Title 24 and are themselves Type I when not subject to SEPA. The only ADU flavor that needs a hearing is the industrial accessory dwelling unit of SVMC 19.40.040, a separate use in the IMU and I zones that requires a conditional use permit.

Table 17.80-1 (Type I, 'Accessory dwelling units', 19.40); SVMC 17.80.020(A); SVMC 19.40.040(C)
Rental restrictions
The ADU may be rented long-term with no minimum lease term, but only the unit the owner does not occupy: the owner must live in one of the two units six or more months a year and may never collect rent on that unit, so an absentee owner cannot rent both. Spokane Valley has no short-term rental ordinance.

Chapter 19.40 SVMC sets no minimum lease term, no rent limit and no tenant restrictions, so a conventional long-term tenancy in the non-owner-occupied unit is unrestricted. What the code does forbid is renting out both units: SVMC 19.40.030(D)(1) requires the titleholder to live in one of them and bars rent on that unit. Home businesses are prohibited in the ADU entirely. On short stays, the phrase 'short-term rental' does not appear anywhere in the Spokane Valley Municipal Code (a full-text search of the code returned no match), so there is no registration, permit, cap or primary-residence test of the kind Spokane city adopted; short-stay lodging in a residential zone instead runs through the separate 'Bed and breakfast' use, permitted in R-1 through R-4 and MFR and defined as a single-family dwelling providing accommodations to paying guests, which is the house rather than the ADU. Lodging businesses owe the transient occupancy tax of Chapter 3.20 SVMC and, inside the tourism promotion area, the lodging charge of Chapter 3.21 SVMC. Separately, SVMC 5.05.010(C)(1) counts 'owning, renting, leasing, maintaining, or having the right to use, or using ... real property permanently or temporarily located in the City' as engaging in business, SVMC 5.05.020 requires anyone engaging in business to hold a city business license registration, and the exemptions in SVMC 5.05.030 do not carve out residential landlords. The code is silent on selling an ADU separately or as a condominium.

SVMC 19.40.030(D)(1), (D)(3); SVMC 19.60.050 ('Bed and breakfast'); Appendix A SVMC ('Bed and breakfast'); Chapters 3.20 and 3.21 SVMC; SVMC 5.05.010(C)(1), 5.05.020, 5.05.030
The fine print: 11 caveats that can change the picture
  • STATE LAW WILL OVERRIDE MOST OF THIS AT THE END OF 2026. Spokane Valley is in Spokane County, which RCW 36.70A.130(5)(c) puts on a periodic comprehensive plan update deadline of December 31, 2026, and RCW 36.70A.680(1)(a) as amended by 2025 c 148 s 4 makes the HB 1337 accessory dwelling unit requirements 'take effect at the same time as the jurisdiction's next periodic comprehensive plan update' (the original 2023 text said six months after). The city has not adopted implementing code, so SVMC 19.40.030 is fully operative today; from the update date, RCW 36.70A.680(1)(b) provides that the state requirements 'supersede, preempt, and invalidate any conflicting local development regulations.' The city itself says so: its January 30, 2026 SEPA determination describes the No Action Alternative as one that 'implements required changes to state housing laws that will take effect even if the City does not act,' expressly including accessory dwelling units in the R1, R2, R3 and R4 zones.
  • Provisions of SVMC 19.40.030 that conflict with RCW 36.70A.681 and are therefore on borrowed time: the owner occupancy requirement (RCW 36.70A.681(1)(b)); one ADU per lot rather than two (RCW 36.70A.681(1)(c)); the 50 percent of habitable floor area cap, which sits below the 1,000 sq ft floor a city may not go under (RCW 36.70A.681(1)(f)); the flat one-space parking requirement, which may not be imposed at all within half a mile walking distance of a major transit stop (RCW 36.70A.681(2)(a)(i)); the design-match and entrance-location rules, which are exactly the aesthetic requirements and 'restrictions on entry door locations' barred by RCW 36.70A.681(1)(h) where they are more restrictive than for principal units; the exclusion of ADUs from the MFR zone, which permits single-family dwellings (RCW 36.70A.681(1)(c) reaches all zoning districts in an urban growth area that allow single-family homes); and the requirement that a converted accessory structure meet all current standards, where RCW 36.70A.681(1)(j) requires conversions to be allowed even when the existing structure violates current setback or lot coverage rules. Short-term rental restrictions are expressly preserved by RCW 36.70A.680(5)(a), but Spokane Valley has none.
  • Zone coverage: the permitted uses matrix marks 'Dwelling, accessory units' with an 'S' in R-1, R-2, R-3, R-4, MU, CMU, NC, RC and IMU, and leaves the cell blank (prohibited) in MFR, I and POS. The gap that surprises people is MFR: single-family dwellings are permitted there, but ADUs are not. In the mixed-use and nonresidential zones, SVMC 19.70.050(G) makes residential development follow the MFR density and dimensional standards.
  • Only one ADU is allowed per lot, attached or detached (SVMC 19.40.030(A)(2)), and none at all on a lot that already contains a duplex, a multifamily dwelling or an accessory apartment inside the principal structure (SVMC 19.40.030(C)(3)).
  • Setbacks are the dwelling setbacks, not the friendlier accessory-structure setbacks. SVMC 19.40.030(C)(2) requires an ADU to preserve the side and rear yard setbacks for a dwelling unit under Table 19.70-1, so a detached ADU faces a 20 ft rear yard in R-1 and R-2 and 10 ft in R-3 and R-4 with 5 ft sides, rather than the 5 ft rear and side allowed for ordinary accessory structures under SVMC 19.70.050(C). The unit must also sit behind the front building setback line on a permanent foundation. There is no alley-line allowance of the kind RCW 36.70A.681(1)(i) will require.
  • Design-match rules are unusually detailed: the ADU must visually match the primary dwelling in exterior finish materials, roof pitch, trim, and window proportion and orientation, and an attached unit's entrance must be on the side or rear or otherwise unobtrusive from the street, with only one entrance permitted on the front facade (SVMC 19.40.030(B)(1), (B)(2)).
  • 'Habitable square footage', the base for the 50 percent size cap, is not defined in the SVMC and has no entry in Appendix A, so the number a reviewer starts from is a staff interpretation rather than a code-defined measurement.
  • Home businesses are prohibited in the ADU (SVMC 19.40.030(D)(3)), even though a home business permit is otherwise available as a Type I application under SVMC 19.65.180.
  • Industrial accessory dwelling units (SVMC 19.40.040) are a different use entirely: allowed only in the IMU and I zones, up to 10 per site, prohibited on the first floor, capped at two bedrooms, and requiring a conditional use permit under Chapter 19.150 SVMC. Do not confuse them with a backyard ADU.
  • Transportation impact fees under Chapter 22.100 SVMC are not citywide: they apply only to development inside the geographic service areas established by the adopted rate studies, which SVMC 22.100.010(B) identifies as the South Barker Corridor studies of February and September 2020, with the rate table carried in the city's master fee schedule. RCW 36.70A.681(1)(a) will cap any ADU impact fee at 50 percent of the principal unit's fee once the state mandate binds.
  • The Spokane Valley Municipal Code moved from Code Publishing to General Code's eCode360 platform. The city's own ADU page and Comprehensive Plan page still link to codepublishing.com/WA/SpokaneValley/, which now serves only a redirect notice pointing at https://ecode360.com/SP4654. Cite and read the eCode360 copy.

Summarized from Spokane Valley's ordinance text, read August 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Spokane Valley with 16 nearby cities

ADU regulations

Washington statewide law also applies

Washington sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See Washington statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Spokane Valley has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Spokane Valley?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.