City · California

ADU rules in Costa Mesa

5 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Costa Mesa: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Allowed

Detached ADUs are allowed on any legal lot with a proposed or existing home in zones that allow single-family or multifamily dwellings, and at approved master plan sites with residential uses in other zones; the Citywide Land Use Matrix (Table 13-30, row 22.2) shows ADUs as permitted in R1, R2-MD, R2-HD, R3, TC, PDR-LD, PDR-MD, PDR-HD, PDR-NCM, PDC, PDI and LT, and § 13-35(b)(1) controls if the matrix conflicts. A single-family lot may combine one detached new-construction ADU, one conversion ADU and one JADU, the combination HCD's 9-11-2024 findings required and Ord. 2025-02 added. Lots with an existing multifamily building may add up to eight detached ADUs (never more than the number of existing units), and new multifamily construction may include up to two. A new detached unit of up to 800 sq ft with 4 ft side and rear setbacks and an 18 ft height (plus 2 ft for a roof pitch matching the house) is exempt from the local development standards under Gov. Code 66323(a).

CMMC § 13-35(b)(1), (b)(4)(a)-(b), (d) (as amended by Ord. 2025-02, adopted 4-1-2025, and Ord. 2025-07, adopted 10-21-2025); Table 13-30 row 22.2; Gov. Code 66323(a)
Attached or internal ADU
Allowed

Attached ADUs, ADUs converted from space inside an existing home or a lawfully built accessory structure (up to 150 sq ft may be added to an accessory structure for access), and ADUs built entirely inside a proposed home are all allowed, and a conversion ADU and a JADU may share the same single-family dwelling. A JADU of up to 500 sq ft must be entirely within an existing or proposed single-family dwelling, which includes an attached garage, with its own exterior entrance and an efficiency kitchen. On lots with an existing multifamily building, ADUs may be created in non-livable space (storage rooms, attics, basements, garages) for up to 25 percent of the existing units, and at least one. Local-track ADUs must stay on the first floor unless built entirely within a home or unless they meet all five second-story conditions in (d)(9)(a): second-floor portions at least 25 ft from the front property line, interior or compliant exterior stairs, no larger than the garage footprint when built over a detached garage, 5 ft sill heights for side windows within 25 ft of a neighboring dwelling, and the setbacks that apply to additions.

CMMC § 13-35(b)(4)(a)(1)-(2), (b)(4)(b)(1), (b)(5)(c), (c)(2), (c)(5)-(6), (c)(9), (d)(9)
Maximum size
1,200 sq ft detached; attached the greater of 50% of the home or 1,000 sq ft; multifamily lots 850 sq ft detached (1,000 with 2+ bedrooms); conversions uncapped; JADU 500 sq ft; 150 sq ft minimum; 27 ft or two stories max

On a lot with a single-family home a detached ADU may not exceed 1,200 sq ft, and an attached ADU may reach the greater of 50 percent of the existing home or 1,000 sq ft. On lots with an existing multifamily building a detached ADU is capped at 850 sq ft, or 1,000 sq ft with more than one bedroom (state-exempt units excepted), and an attached ADU at the greater of 1,000 sq ft or 50 percent of the average existing unit. ADUs converted entirely from existing space, or built entirely within a proposed single-family home, have no size cap; JADUs are limited to 500 sq ft of gross floor area; and an ADU may be as small as 150 sq ft. No new-construction ADU may exceed 27 ft or two stories, and local-track units stay on one floor unless they meet the second-story conditions, while the state-exempt detached unit is limited to 800 sq ft and 18 ft (plus 2 ft for a matching roof pitch) with 4 ft side and rear setbacks. The code does not say how ADU floor area is measured.

CMMC § 13-35(b)(5)(a)-(c), (b)(6), (c)(2), (d) intro, (d)(9); Gov. Code 66321(b), 66323(a)
Owner occupancy
Not required

No owner-occupancy requirement applies to ADUs: Ord. 2025-02 deleted the clause that would have required owner occupancy for ADUs approved on or after 1-1-2025 (HCD's 9-11-2024 finding 13), and Gov. Code 66315 forbids one. For JADUs the codified text still requires the owner to live in the main home or the JADU in every case ((c)(3)) and to record a covenant saying so ((d)(5)(b)), but since 1-1-2026 Gov. Code 66333(b) allows that requirement only when the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the main home, and the covenant applies only 'unless subsequently prohibited by an amendment to state law.' A JADU with its own bathroom therefore carries no owner-occupancy duty, and the pending Neighborhoods Where We All Belong amendment would rewrite (c)(3) to the shared-sanitation rule. Government agencies, land trusts and housing organizations are exempt in any case.

CMMC § 13-35(c)(3), (d)(5); Gov. Code 66315, 66333(b)
Extra parking
None (parking optional for ADUs and JADUs)

Costa Mesa requires no off-street parking for an ADU: § 13-35(d)(15) says only that the owner 'may provide' a space of at least 8.5 by 18 ft, as tandem parking on an existing driveway or within a setback, and the city ADU page calls parking optional. JADUs need no parking beyond what the primary dwelling already requires. Garages or spaces converted or demolished for an ADU need not be replaced, and the driveway keeps its status as a lawful driveway, though a demolition counts only if the ADU is built within the old garage footprint. The residential parking section defers to § 13-35 (§ 13-85(d) as restated by Ord. 2026-03, adopted 4-7-2026 and not yet codified on eCode360).

CMMC § 13-35(c)(7), (d)(15); § 13-85(d) (Ord. 2026-03, Exhibit A); Gov. Code 66322
Approval process
Permitted use

An ADU application that meets § 13-35 is approved ministerially through a building permit, without a public hearing, notice of decision or zoning approval, under Gov. Code 66317 (completeness check within 15 business days and a decision within 60 days). The local development standards in (d) do not apply to the state-exempt units in Gov. Code 66323(a), and they yield wherever they would preclude an 800 sq ft ADU with 4 ft side and rear setbacks. The application must be filed by the owner of the parcel on the city form with the council-set fee. The pending Neighborhoods Where We All Belong draft would add the 66317 completeness and written-denial procedure that HCD's 2024 finding 2 asked for, without changing the ministerial path.

CMMC § 13-35(b)(3), (d) intro, (d)(1)-(2), (d)(7); Gov. Code 66317, 66323(a)
Rental restrictions
Long-term rentals allowed; ADUs and JADUs may not be rented for less than 31 days; citywide STR ban (Ord. 2021-17; hosted home-sharing exempt only if operating by 12-1-2020); no separate sale

An ADU or JADU may be rented long term but not for periods of less than 31 days, and the city's short-term rental page says ADUs cannot be used as short-term rentals. Urgency Ord. 2021-17 (adopted 11-2-2021, effective immediately and deliberately left uncodified) separately prohibits every rental of 30 days or fewer in all zones except hosted home-sharing by a natural person who was already home-sharing a primary residence, or an ADU or JADU where short-term rentals were not otherwise prohibited, by 12-1-2020; on 1-28-2025 the council voted 5-2 to receive and file, rather than adopt, a proposed suspension for wildfire evacuees. The 31-day floor runs one day past Gov. Code 66315, which lets a city require rental terms of 30 days or longer for ordinary ADUs, but matches the longer-than-30-day terms Gov. Code 66323(e) and 66333(g) require for state-exempt units and JADUs. ADUs and JADUs may not be sold or conveyed apart from the primary residence except as state law provides (Gov. Code 66341 qualified nonprofits); § 13-35 contains no Gov. Code 66342 condominium opt-in.

CMMC § 13-35(b)(8), (c)(4), (d)(3); Ord. 2021-17 §§ 3, 4, 10 (urgency, adopted 11-2-2021, uncodified); Gov. Code 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342
The fine print: 9 caveats that can change the picture
  • Operative text is CMMC § 13-35 as amended by Ord. 2025-02 (Code Amendment PCTY-24-0002: PC 2-24-2025, first reading 3-18-2025, adopted 4-1-2025) and Ord. 2025-07 (PCTY-25-0001 technical update, adopted 10-21-2025), codified on eCode360 (book through Ord. 2025-08 of 11-18-2025). The seven uncodified 2026 ordinances in the eCode360 New Laws bank leave § 13-35 untouched: Ord. 2026-01 (small lots), Ord. 2026-03 (Housing Element rezoning, which restates the § 13-6 definitions, Table 13-30 ADU rows and § 13-85(d) without changing their substance) and Ord. 2026-07 (non-residential uses, adopted 9-1-2026).
  • State law overrides local text: the universal JADU owner-occupancy rule in § 13-35(c)(3) and the (d)(5)(b) covenant yield to Gov. Code 66333(b) for a JADU with its own bathroom; (d)(1) still cites Gov. Code 66332, renumbered 66311.7 by SB 543; and the 31-day rental floor exceeds the 30-day term Gov. Code 66315 allows a city to require for ordinary ADUs by one day.
  • Pending: the Neighborhoods Where We All Belong package (PCTY-26-0004; Planning Commission 9-14-2026, continued 4-3 to 9-28-2026; City Council hearing anticipated 10-20-2026) would amend § 13-35 to answer HCD comments received in May 2026: JADU owner occupancy only with shared sanitation, a written Gov. Code 66317 completeness and denial procedure, and a clause that nothing limits ADUs authorized by Gov. Code 66314 and 66323. The PC draft (Resolution PC-2026-27, Exhibit B) leaves sizes, optional parking and the 31-day rental floor unchanged. Re-read § 13-35 after second reading (an ordinance takes effect 30 days after final passage).
  • HCD: the findings of 9-11-2024 on Ord. 2023-03 (ADU0007541, 21 items, response received) were largely cured by Ords. 2025-02 and 2025-07 (state-exempt combinations, JADUs in attached garages, removal of the ADU owner-occupancy and ADU deed-restriction clauses, objective design wording, a 27 ft height limit); the only other ADU-law letter is the 3-17-2022 findings letter (ADU0007542). HCD's Power BI dashboard (queried 2026-10-06) lists no ADU-law letter after 9-11-2024; its newest Costa Mesa items are Housing Element and fair-housing letters (Notice of Violation 8-22-2025, HAU0002427; technical assistance letter 6-8-2026, HAU0002311). The 'comments received by HCD in May 2026' that the NWWAB staff report cites are therefore not a published ADU findings letter and their text is not public. No public record shows when Ords. 2025-02 and 2025-07 were sent to HCD, so a Gov. Code 66326(d) submission argument cannot be ruled out, though no unanswered ADU findings exist.
  • Chaptered 2026 law: AB 956 (Ch. 791, Stats. 2026, effective 1-1-2027) raises the Gov. Code 66323 exempt-pathway count to two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot (no JADU owed where two exist), overriding the one-detached-ADU count in § 13-35(b)(4)(a) from that date; SB 1117 (Ch. 809, Stats. 2026, effective 1-1-2027) limits impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft to the area above 750 sq ft. Costa Mesa's ADU and JADU park impact fees are set by council resolution under § 13-276.6(a), which sets no size threshold of its own and still cites legacy Gov. Code 65852.2 (now 66311.5 for impact fees), so the SB 1117 rule reaches the fee resolution from that date. Re-check both on or after 1-1-2027.
  • Local-track design rules (one-story default with five second-story conditions, 25 ft front setback for second-floor portions, matching materials and colors, entry placement, stair and balcony screening, open space and landscaping for ADUs over 800 sq ft) apply only to units outside Gov. Code 66323(a) and cannot preclude an 800 sq ft ADU with 4 ft side and rear setbacks; where they would set a lower height than Gov. Code 66321(b)(4), state law controls.
  • Zones: Table 13-30 shows ADUs as permitted in R1, R2-MD, R2-HD, R3, TC, PDR-LD, PDR-MD, PDR-HD, PDR-NCM, PDC, PDI and LT and JADUs in the same zones except TC; ADUs are not listed in AP, CL, C1, C2, C1-S, MG, MP, I&R, I&R-S or P, but § 13-35(b)(1) allows them at approved master plan sites with residential uses in any zone and controls over the matrix.
  • Short-term rentals: Ord. 2021-17's home-sharing exemption covers only hosts who were home-sharing by 12-1-2020 and reaches an ADU or JADU only where short-term rentals were not otherwise prohibited, which the § 13-35 31-day rule forecloses; enforcement is through the misdemeanor, infraction and nuisance provisions the ordinance cites.
  • Stale city documents: the April 2023 ADU development standards table (showdocument 48904) and the September 2022 FAQ sheet (showdocument 48902) state superseded rules, including ADU owner occupancy after 1-1-2025 and recorded ADU deed restrictions; the current ADU page no longer links them and they are not curated.

Summarized from Costa Mesa's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Costa Mesa with 119 nearby cities

ADU regulations

Short-term rental rules

Planning to rent your ADU on Airbnb or VRBO? Costa Mesa regulates short-term rentals separately; check these before counting on nightly rental income.

California statewide law also applies

California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See California statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Costa Mesa has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Costa Mesa?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.