City · California
ADU rules in Dana Point
These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Dana Point: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.
Rules at a glance
Outside the coastal zone (about 52 percent of the city's 4,134 acres), Ord. 26-07 makes detached ADUs a ministerial use from about 10-15-2026: a state-exempt detached unit of up to 800 sq ft of livable space with 4 ft side and rear setbacks on any lot with an existing or proposed single-family home (§ 9.07.212(E)(2)), up to eight detached units on a lot with an existing multifamily building and two with a proposed one (E)(4), and a local-track detached unit under § 9.07.212(F) (one per single-family lot; none in multifamily or mixed-use zones unless the lot holds a single-family home). In six mapped Public Safety Areas, a local-track ADU on a lot whose existing development is nonconforming as to parking or driveway length needs a discretionary Site Development Permit ((F)(1)(c)). Inside the coastal zone (the Coastal Overlay District, about 48 percent of the city), Ord. 26-07 has no effect until the Coastal Commission certifies an LCP amendment (Ord. 26-07 § 6), and the city applies the certified LCP rule that Ord. 26-08 reinstated as § 9.07.210: a detached second unit of up to 1,200 sq ft needs a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit plus a coastal development permit. Gov. Code 66317(a)(1) requires ministerial approval without a hearing, but 66329(a) preserves the Coastal Act, and HCD's 8-13-2025 notice accepted that a fully certified LCP's conflicting provisions supersede State ADU Law inside the coastal zone.
DPZC § 9.07.212(E)(2), (E)(4), (F)(1)(b)-(c), (F)(3) and Ord. No. 26-07 § 6 (adopted 9-15-2026, effective about 10-15-2026); DPZC § 9.07.210(b) as reinstated by Ord. No. 26-08 (adopted 9-15-2026; certified LCP text); Gov. Code 66317(a)(1), 66323(a)(2), (a)(4), 66329(a)Outside the coastal zone, Ord. 26-07 allows ministerially one ADU and one JADU within the existing or proposed space of a single-family home (an ADU may instead occupy an existing accessory structure, with up to 150 sq ft of expansion for access), multifamily conversion ADUs (the greater of 25 percent of the existing units or one per building), and a local-track attached ADU of new construction (§ 9.07.212(E)(1), (E)(3), (F)). An attached ADU may be two stories up to 25 ft or the zone height, whichever is lower ((F)(5)(c)). The § 9.09.020 use tables list JADUs as P* in the RSF districts, RBR 12 and RSF 22 but X in the RBRD 18, RD 14 and RMF districts, narrower than Gov. Code 66323(a)(1) for single-family lots in those zones. Inside the coastal zone an attached second unit, like a detached one, needs a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit and a coastal development permit under the certified LCP text (§ 9.07.210(b) as reinstated by Ord. 26-08), and the LCP says nothing about JADUs or conversions, so how the city handles them there is undocumented.
DPZC § 9.07.212(E)(1), (E)(3), (F)(5)(c) and § 9.07.215 (Ord. No. 26-07); DPZC § 9.09.020(b) use tables; DPZC § 9.07.210(b)(1) (Ord. No. 26-08); Gov. Code 66323(a)(1), (a)(3), 66329(a), 66333Ord. 26-07 caps local-track (non-mandatory) ADUs at 850 sq ft of interior livable space for one bedroom or less and 1,000 sq ft for more than one bedroom (§ 9.07.212(F)(6)(b)), the Gov. Code 66321(b)(2) figures; an attached ADU added to an existing home is also limited to 50 percent of the home's living area, but attached new construction is never held below 800 sq ft, and conversions have no maximum ((F)(6)(a)). The state-exempt detached unit may be held to 800 sq ft of livable space ((E)(2)(c)), a JADU to 500 sq ft of livable space (§ 9.07.215(D)(3)(a)), and an ADU that misses the objective standards can reach 1,200 sq ft of living area only through a discretionary Site Development Permit ((H)(3)). Heights are 16 ft for detached units, 18 ft within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor or beside a multistory multifamily building, plus up to 2 ft to match the main roof pitch, and 25 ft or the zone height, whichever is lower, for attached units ((F)(5)). Inside the coastal zone the certified LCP limits a second unit to 30 percent of the main home's living area when attached and 1,200 sq ft when detached, with no encroachment into the main home's setbacks (§ 9.07.210(b)(2)-(3) as reinstated by Ord. 26-08); the 30 percent rule falls below the 800 sq ft guarantee of 66321(b)(3) for any home under about 2,667 sq ft.
DPZC § 9.07.212(E)(2)(c), (F)(5), (F)(6), (H)(3) and § 9.07.215(D)(3)(a) (Ord. No. 26-07, effective about 10-15-2026); DPZC § 9.07.210(b)(2)-(3) (Ord. No. 26-08; certified LCP text of Ords. 94-21 and 96-10); Gov. Code 66321(b)(2)-(4), 66323(a)(2)(A)Ord. 26-07 drops owner occupancy for ADUs: state-exempt units take the sale and rental rules of § 9.07.215(D)(1) "except that an ADU shall not be subject to the owner-occupancy requirement" there unless conveyed under Gov. Code 66341 (§ 9.07.212(E)(1)(f)), and the local-track rule ((F)(2)) has no occupancy clause, replacing the codified 2021 text that required an owner to live on the lot from 1-1-2025. For a JADU the owner must make the main home or the JADU a primary residence only when the JADU lacks separate sanitation facilities (§ 9.07.215(D)(1)), matching Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by AB 1154; § 9.07.215(C)(1) still calls for a recorded deed restriction, which 66333(c) requires in any event. Gov. Code 66315 bars owner-occupancy conditions on ADUs. The certified coastal-zone text has no owner-occupancy rule, but it limits who may occupy a second unit (see rentalRestrictions).
DPZC § 9.07.212(E)(1)(f), (F)(2) and § 9.07.215(C)(1), (D)(1) (Ord. No. 26-07); DPZC § 9.07.210(b)(1) (Ord. No. 26-08); Gov. Code 66315, 66333(b)-(c), 66341Ord. 26-07 requires at least one off-street space per local-track ADU except an efficiency unit; it may be uncovered, tandem or in setbacks unless the city finds that infeasible for site, topographic or fire and life safety reasons, it is in addition to the main home's parking, and a nonconforming main-home parking area need not be corrected (§ 9.07.212(F)(8)(a)-(d)). No space is required within one-half mile walking distance of public transit "including bus stops", in an architecturally and historically significant district, for a unit inside the existing or proposed home or an existing accessory structure, where on-street permits are required but not offered, within one block of a car-share vehicle, or when the ADU is applied for with a new single-family or multifamily home ((F)(8)(e)-(f)); state-exempt units carry no parking (Gov. Code 66323(b)), and a JADU needs none, with no replacement when it converts enclosed parking (§ 9.07.215(D)(4)). The ordinance does not restate the Gov. Code 66314(d)(11) bar on replacing a garage or carport demolished or converted for an ADU, an omission HCD's 6-8-2026 review flagged, but the statute applies regardless. Inside the coastal zone the certified LCP requires "an additional parking stall" under Chapter 9.35 for every second unit (§ 9.07.210(b)(4)), which 66322(a) would bar outside the coastal zone.
DPZC § 9.07.212(F)(8) and § 9.07.215(D)(4) (Ord. No. 26-07); DPZC § 9.07.210(b)(4) (Ord. No. 26-08); Gov. Code 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a), 66323(b), 66334(a)Outside the coastal zone an ADU or JADU needs an ADU (or JADU) Permit plus a building permit, which the Community Development Director decides "ministerially without any discretionary review or a public hearing" within 60 days of a complete application (§ 9.07.212(D)(4)(a)-(b); § 9.07.215(C)(4)); the city's ADU page lists a $5,422 ADU Permit fee. Two discretionary Site Development Permit paths heard by the Planning Commission remain: local-track units on lots in the six Public Safety Areas whose existing development is nonconforming as to parking or driveway length ((F)(1)(c)-(d)), and any unit that exceeds the objective standards ((H)); HCD's 6-8-2026 preliminary review called the PSA rule a moratorium that needs HCD approval under Gov. Code 66300(b)(1)(B)(ii) before it can take effect. Inside the coastal zone a second unit needs a Conditional Use Permit approved by the Planning Commission (§ 9.07.210(b), certified LCP) plus a coastal development permit; Gov. Code 66329(a), as amended by AB 462 effective 10-10-2025, requires the city to approve or deny the coastal permit within 60 days under 66317, concurrently with the ADU review and without any required hearing, and 66329(c) bars appeal of that decision to the Coastal Commission. The value is "varies" because the same ADU is ministerial inland and a conditional use in the coastal zone.
DPZC § 9.07.212(D)(4), (F)(1)(c)-(d), (G), (H) and § 9.07.215(C)(4) (Ord. No. 26-07); DPZC § 9.07.210(b) (Ord. No. 26-08); HCD preliminary review of 6-8-2026 (Supporting Document B to the 9-1-2026 council agenda report, item 9); Gov. Code 66300(b)(1)(B), 66317(a), 66329(a), (c)Ord. 26-07 lets an ADU be rented but not "for less than thirty (30) days" and bars separate sale unless state law allows it (§ 9.07.212(F)(2)); the 30-day term is lawful for ordinary ADUs under Gov. Code 66315, while state law requires terms longer than 30 days for state-exempt units (66323(e)) and JADUs (66333(g)), and the JADU section is silent on rental terms. Outside the coastal zone DPMC § 5.38.090(a) bars renting or advertising any ADU or JADU as a short-term rental and bars issuing it an STR permit, and inside the coastal zone § 10(a) of the Coastal Commission-approved STR Program (CDP A-5-DPT-22-0038) says the same, though per the Commission staff report a host may stay in the ADU while renting the main home. Separate sale is limited to what state law allows (the 66341 nonprofit path); the "Government Code 66340 et. seq." wording does not expressly opt into 66342 condominium sales, as HCD noted in 2025. Inside the coastal zone the certified LCP adds that a second unit "may be occupied by an individual adult or two senior adults", may not be sold separately, and must be affordable to low- and moderate-income persons for the life of the project, with the CUP and its conditions recorded (§ 9.07.210(b)(1), (6)-(7)), limits 66315 would not allow outside the coastal zone.
DPZC § 9.07.212(F)(2) (Ord. No. 26-07); DPMC § 5.38.010, § 5.38.090(a) (Ord. No. 25-09, 6-17-2025); Dana Point Coastal Zone STR Program § 10(a) (CDP A-5-DPT-22-0038, Coastal Commission de novo hearing 11-16-2022); DPZC § 9.07.210(b)(1), (6)-(7) (Ord. No. 26-08); Gov. Code 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342The fine print: 10 caveats that can change the picture
- Two regimes by location: Ord. 26-07 (DPZC § 9.07.212 and § 9.07.215) governs only outside the coastal zone. Inside the Coastal Overlay District (1,993 of the city's 4,134 acres, about 48 percent, per the certified Housing Element) the city applies the certified LCP's Second Dwelling Units section, § 9.07.210 as reinstated by Ord. 26-08: a Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit plus a coastal development permit, 30 percent of living area attached or 1,200 sq ft detached, one added parking stall, occupancy by one adult or two senior adults, and affordability to low- and moderate-income persons for the life of the unit. The Coastal Commission's maps put the shoreline areas of Monarch Beach and Capistrano Beach, the Headlands, the Harbor, the Town Center and the central bluff and Doheny areas inside it; check a parcel against the city's zoning map.
- Coastal-zone legal tension: the CUP hearing, the occupancy and affordability limits and the 30 percent cap would conflict with Gov. Code 66315, 66317(a)(1) and 66321(b)(3) outside the coastal zone, but 66329(a) preserves the Coastal Act, and HCD's 8-13-2025 notice agreed that a fully certified LCP's conflicting provisions supersede State ADU Law there while saying the city "still has a duty to follow State ADU Law". Since 10-10-2025 (AB 462) 66329(a) requires a decision on an ADU coastal permit within 60 days, concurrently with the 66317 review and with no required hearing, and 66329(c) bars appeal to the Coastal Commission. The Commission's 7-1-2026 SB 1077 guidance asks cities to apply outdated LCP ADU rules only as needed to protect coastal resources and to use variances and other flexibility otherwise; the city says it will consider a future LCP amendment, but none has been submitted, and no coastal second-unit CUP appeared on any 2025-2026 Planning Commission agenda.
- LCP layers: the Coastal Commission describes Dana Point's certified LCP as two sets of documents, the 1996 LCP built on the Zoning Code and later plans, and the county-era 1986 Dana Point Specific Plan LCP that still covers the central part of the coastal zone; the city treats § 9.07.210 as the coastal second-unit rule throughout, and the Specific Plan text was not read.
- Effective dates: Ord. 26-07 was adopted 9-15-2026 and takes effect about 10-15-2026 (the Director told the Planning Commission on 9-28-2026 it "will become effective in 30 days, pending review by" HCD). Interim urgency Ord. 25-11 (9-18-2025), extended on 10-21-2025, ran to about 9-16-2026 and was not extended again, so for roughly four weeks the only regular local text outside the coastal zone was Ord. 25-04, which HCD declared null and void on 8-13-2025 (state standards apply in that window). eCode360 (codified through Ord. 26-05 of 6-2-2026) still prints the 2021 text of § 9.07.210 and § 9.07.215; the fields cite the signed Ords. 26-07 and 26-08 in its New Laws bank.
- HCD review pending: Ord. 26-07 must reach HCD by about 11-14-2026 (Gov. Code 66326(a)). HCD's 6-8-2026 preliminary review of the draft called the Public Safety Area Site Development Permit rule a moratorium that cannot take effect without HCD approval under Gov. Code 66300(b)(1)(B)(ii), said the city must allow one 66314 unit in combination with the 66323 units, and asked for the 66314(d)(11) replacement-parking bar; the adopted text keeps the PSA rule for local-track units, keeps a one-local-ADU-per-lot count in § 9.07.212(F)(3)(a) (while § 9.07.215(D)(2)(a) allows one attached and one detached ADU plus a JADU) and omits (d)(11). An HCD finding left unanswered for 30 days would void the ordinance (66326(d); 66316) and substitute the state standards (1,200 sq ft detached, 50 percent attached).
- Public Safety Areas: six mapped areas (RMF14 between Selva and Pacific Coast Highway; RMF14 on Nottingham Way and Cheltam Way; RSF22 between La Crest and Pacific Coast Highway; C/R in Doheny Village; RD-14 and RSF12 in Capistrano Beach), about 450 acres or 11 percent of the city per HCD. A local-track ADU on a lot there whose existing development is nonconforming as to parking or driveway length needs a Planning Commission Site Development Permit; the city relies on a Fehr and Peers parking-citation study, while HCD noted lower per-capita collision rates there and said the findings do not justify a moratorium.
- Other conflicts in Ord. 26-07: the roof deck and balcony ban (§ 9.07.212(F)(7)(a)(vi)) is applied to state-exempt units against 66323(b); the § 9.09.020 use tables list JADUs as not permitted (X) in the RBRD 18, RD 14 and RMF districts although 66323(a)(1) reaches any single-family lot in a residential zone; § 9.07.215(C)(1) requires a JADU deed restriction "as provided in Section 9.07.215(D)(2)", a paragraph that now sets unit counts (66333(c) still requires one); and the Flood Plain Overlay rule (§ 9.31.040(a), no structures that raise base flood elevations) may block ADUs on some lots, a point HCD raised. The Doheny Village use table (§ 9.14.020) was not read.
- Stale city materials, not curated: the city's Accessory Dwelling Unit Permit page (danapoint.org, read 2026-10-07) tells applicants to "first review the City's ADU Ordinance No. 25-04" and links its eCode360 PDF (LF2276725, tagged Superseded in the Law Ledger), though it correctly says that ordinance does not apply in the Coastal Overlay Zone, describes the 60-day clock and lists the $5,422 ADU Permit fee; the October 2025 submittal checklist says an ADU, JADU or main home may not rent for under 30 days "unless operating with an approved Short-Term Rental Permit", but ADUs and JADUs cannot hold STR permits. The codified eCode360 § 9.07.210 and § 9.07.215 (2021 text: owner occupancy from 2025, HOA approval, one-story 16 ft limit, rear-half siting, solar panels) are superseded.
- 2027 state changes: AB 956 (Chapter 791, Statutes of 2026, effective 1-1-2027) amends Gov. Code 66323 to allow two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot under the exempt pathway, with no JADU owed where two exist, overriding the one-unit count in § 9.07.212(E)(2) outside the coastal zone; SB 1117 (Chapter 809, Statutes of 2026, effective 1-1-2027) limits impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft to the area above 750 sq ft (Gov. Code 66311.5).
- Re-verification: re-check when eCode360 codifies Ords. 26-07 and 26-08 (a new § 9.07.212 node; the replacement records on the old § 9.07.210 and § 9.07.215 guids can then be retired), after any HCD letter on Ord. 26-07 (submission due about 11-14-2026), when the city submits an ADU LCP amendment to the Coastal Commission, and on 1-1-2027 for AB 956 and SB 1117.
Summarized from Dana Point's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.
ADU regulations
Short-term rental rules
Planning to rent your ADU on Airbnb or VRBO? Dana Point regulates short-term rentals separately; check these before counting on nightly rental income.
California statewide law also applies
California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.
See California statewide rulesSpotted something outdated?
Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Dana Point has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.
Report a correctionReady to build?
Planning an ADU in Dana Point?
Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.