City · California

ADU rules in Fairfield

2 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Fairfield: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Allowed

Detached ADUs are allowed on any lot where a single-family dwelling, duplex, duet or multifamily dwelling is a permitted use and one exists or is proposed (FMC § 25.20.4.11(D)(1)(a)); Table 25-1 sends 'Accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units' in all six residential districts (RVL, RL, RLM, RM, RH, RVH) to that section, and the commercial table (Table 25-9) and the Heart of Fairfield table (§ 25.23.2) do the same wherever housing is allowed. A detached unit outside the state-exempt path must sit 4 ft from side and rear lot lines, meet the zone's front setback and stand 5 ft from the main house, and it must echo the main home's materials and form when visible from the street, use clerestory windows within 15 ft of a neighboring side yard and rest on a permanent foundation ((D)(2)-(3)). The codified count from Ord. 2023-04 is 'one detached ADU and one JADU, or one ADU' per single-family, duplex or duet lot, but Gov. Code 66323(a) requires ministerial approval of any combination of a conversion ADU, a detached new-construction ADU of up to 800 sq ft with 4-ft setbacks and a JADU, and state law controls where they differ (66325). On lots with an existing multifamily building, (D)(1)(b) defers to the state counts, now up to eight detached ADUs but never more than the number of existing units, or two with a proposed multifamily building (66323(a)(4)).

FMC §§ 25.20.4.11(D)(1)-(3), 25.20.2 (Table 25-1), 25.22.2 (Table 25-9), 25.23.2; Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(2)-(3), 66323(a)(2), (a)(4), 66325
Attached or internal ADU
Allowed

ADUs attached to the home as additions, or created inside the existing or proposed home, an attached garage or an existing accessory structure, are allowed on the same lots as detached units (§ 25.50.2 defines an ADU as 'an attached or detached residential dwelling unit'). Conversions of existing living area or an accessory structure need no setbacks ((D)(2)(b)(i)), and a garage may be converted to an ADU or JADU without replacing the lost parking (§ 25.20.4.3(B)). Units carved from existing space that meet the state-exempt test (cited in the code as Gov. Code 65852.2(e)(1), now 66323(a)(1), which allows up to 150 sq ft of expansion for ingress and egress) skip the Planning ADU Permit and the local development standards ((B)(3), (D)(2)). One JADU of 220 to 500 sq ft is allowed per lot where single-family use is permitted, entirely within a single-family home or duet, with an efficiency kitchen and either its own bathroom or shared sanitation with an interior connection to the main home ((E); § 25.50.2). On existing multifamily buildings, conversions of non-livable space such as storage rooms, attics, basements and garages are allowed up to 25 percent of the existing units, at least one (66323(a)(3)).

FMC §§ 25.20.4.11(B)(3), (D)(1)-(2), (E), 25.20.4.3(B), 25.50.2; Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(3), 66323(a)(1), (a)(3), 66333
Maximum size
Detached 1,200 sq ft; attached 50% of the main home or 1,200 sq ft, whichever is less (state floors: 850 sq ft, 1,000 sq ft with 2+ bedrooms, 800 sq ft always allowed); conversions of existing space uncapped; JADU 220-500 sq ft; 16 ft tall (state floors: 25 ft attached, 18 ft detached near transit)

§ 25.20.4.11(D)(2)(a) caps an attached ADU at '50 percent of the floor area of the primary dwelling or 1,200 square feet, whichever is less' and a detached ADU at 1,200 sq ft, and (D)(2)(c) waives lot coverage, floor area ratio, setback or other standards that would block an 800 sq ft, 16-ft ADU with 4-ft side and rear setbacks; JADUs run 220 to 500 sq ft ((E)(2)(b)). State law sets floors the percentage cap cannot undercut: no maximum below 850 sq ft of interior livable space, or 1,000 sq ft for more than one bedroom, and no percentage, coverage or floor-area limit that blocks an 800 sq ft unit (Gov. Code 66321(b)(2)-(3)), while state-exempt conversions are limited only to existing space plus 150 sq ft and a state-exempt detached unit may be held to 800 sq ft (66323(a)(1)-(2)). Height is 16 ft to the roof peak for every ADU, or 25 ft for the whole structure when more than half of the ADU's gross floor area sits above a garage ((D)(2)(a)(iii)); state floors raise an attached ADU to 25 ft or the main-house limit if lower (35 to 50 ft in the standard residential tables, but 18 ft for main dwellings under the SB 9 Table 25-2.1) and a detached ADU to 18 ft within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor (plus 2 ft for a matching roof pitch) or on a lot with a multistory multifamily building (66321(b)(4)). The section does not say how ADU size is measured; the code's gross floor area runs to the exterior faces of walls (§ 25.50.2) while the state floors are stated in interior livable space. If the ordinance is void under Gov. Code 66316 or 66326(d) (see caveats), the state default applies instead: attached ADUs up to 50 percent of the existing home with no 1,200 sq ft ceiling and detached ADUs up to 1,200 sq ft (66314(d)(4)-(5)).

FMC §§ 25.20.4.11(D)(2)(a), (D)(2)(c), (E)(2)(b), 25.50.2 (Floor Area, Gross), 25.20.3 (Tables 25-2 to 25-5, 25-2.1); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(4)-(5), 66321(b)(2)-(4), 66323(a)(1)-(2)
Owner occupancy
Not required

Fairfield imposes no owner-occupancy requirement on ADUs, at application or afterward, and Gov. Code 66315 forbids one. For JADUs, § 25.20.4.11(G) still says owner occupancy 'is required for any property with a JADU' (the owner may live in the main home or the JADU; government agencies, land trusts and housing organizations are exempt), and (H) requires a recorded JADU deed restriction before the certificate of occupancy. Since 1-1-2026, Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by AB 1154 and SB 543 allows a JADU owner-occupancy requirement only where the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the main home, so a JADU with its own bathroom carries none and the universal local clause yields (66325). The JADU deed restriction itself is lawful because 66333(c) requires one barring separate sale and fixing the unit's size and attributes; HCD's 10-8-2025 letter to the city restated that deed restrictions on ADUs are barred, and Fairfield's code imposes none on ADUs.

FMC § 25.20.4.11(G), (H); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66325, 66333(b)-(c)
Extra parking
None for ADUs or JADUs (citywide, any lot); converted garage spaces need not be replaced

§ 25.20.4.11(C)(4) provides that 'No additional parking shall be required to be provided for either an ADU or a JADU', and the parking table in § 25.34.4 repeats it on the 'Accessory dwelling units' row ('No additional parking shall be required. See § 25.20.4.11.'). Garages may be converted to an ADU or JADU without replacing the displaced spaces (§ 25.20.4.3(B), added by Ord. 2023-04), matching Gov. Code 66314(d)(11). This is more generous than state law, which would let a city require up to one space per ADU or per bedroom outside the 66322(a) exemptions (66314(d)(10)) and bars parking for JADUs (66334(a)); 66325(b) preserves less restrictive local rules, so the answer is the same whether the codified text or state law alone governs. The only related standard is the driveway rule: no more than 40 percent of a lot's frontage may be driveway, with flexibility for cul-de-sac, flag and narrow corner lots ((D)(3)(f)).

FMC §§ 25.20.4.11(C)(4), (D)(3)(f), 25.34.4, 25.20.4.3(B); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a), 66325(b), 66334(a)
Approval process
Permitted use

Outside the state-exempt path an ADU needs a Planning ADU Permit that § 25.20.4.11(B)(2)(b) says 'shall be processed and considered ministerially, without discretionary review or a public hearing ... within 60 days of submittal of a complete application', followed by a building permit; units meeting the state-exempt criteria (cited as Gov. Code 65852.2(e)(1), now 66323) and every JADU skip the planning permit and file a building permit directly with the Building Division ((B)(3)). Planning applications are filed through the city's Fairfield BUILD online portal, and Gov. Code 66317 adds a 15-business-day completeness determination and deemed approval if the city has not acted within 60 days of a complete application. Table 25-1 routes ADUs in every residential district to § 25.20.4.11 rather than to a P or C cell, so no use permit applies. Administrative add-ons: windows within 15 ft of a neighboring side yard must be clerestory unless the neighbor consents or the Zoning Administrator approves an over-the-counter Plan Review ((D)(3)(c); § 25.40.3), and properties on a historic register must show substantial compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines ((B)(6)). Hillside (H) overlay findings (§ 25.28.4(E)) yield to 66317 for ADUs, while lots in the Suisun Marsh management areas face a Marsh Development Authorization hearing (§ 25.40.7) noted in the caveats.

FMC §§ 25.20.4.11(B)(2)-(3), (B)(6), (D)(3)(c), 25.20.2 (Table 25-1), 25.40.3; Gov. Code §§ 66316, 66317(a)
Rental restrictions
Long-term rental allowed; no rentals under 30 consecutive days (longer than 30 days for JADUs and state-exempt units); no short-term rentals; no separate sale

§ 25.20.4.11(C)(2): 'An ADU or JADU may only be rented, leased, and/or occupied for residential purposes. If an ADU or JADU is rented, it shall not be rented for a period of less than 30 consecutive days.' Gov. Code 66315 lets a city require rental terms of 30 days or longer for ordinary ADUs, while state law requires terms longer than 30 days for units approved on the state-exempt path (66323(e)) and for JADUs (66333(g)). Fairfield has no short-term rental permit program: eCode360 searches on 2026-10-06 for 'short-term rental(s)', 'vacation rental', 'home sharing' and 'Airbnb' found nothing in the code, the New Laws bank or public documents, and Table 25-1 lists no transient lodging use in the residential districts (bed and breakfast inns are defined as transient lodging but not listed, and unlisted uses are not allowed under § 25.20.2(B)), so the bar would hold even if the 30-day clause fell with the ordinance. (C)(1) adds 'No ADU or JADU shall be sold separately from the primary residence'; the city has not opted into Gov. Code 66342 condominium conveyance, leaving only the state 66341 qualified-nonprofit route. No city rental registration, rental inspection or rent-stabilization ordinance appears in the code (searched 2026-10-06).

FMC §§ 25.20.4.11(C)(1)-(2), 25.20.2(B) (Table 25-1), 25.50.2 (Bed and Breakfast Inn); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342
The fine print: 13 caveats that can change the picture
  • Which text governs: the codified FMC § 25.20.4.11 (Ord. 2020-05 of 6-9-2020, Ord. 2021-14 of 7-20-2021, Ord. 2023-04 of 2-21-2023; eCode360 book current through legislation of 7-21-2026 with no pending laws) is the only published local ADU text and the one the city ADU page links, but planning staff told the Planning Commission on 6-10-2026 that 'The City's existing ADU regulations do not comply with State law.' Gov. Code 66316 makes a noncompliant ordinance null and void and 66325 makes state law supersede conflicting local text, so the values above are the codified rules as overridden by state law on the conflicting clauses; no city document says Fairfield processes ADUs under state law alone.
  • HCD: a 'Technical Assistance Letter - Repeal Request' dated 10-8-2025 (dashboard case ADU0006749) told the city the most recent Fairfield ADU ordinance on file was from 2018, listed the 2019 to 2025 state changes and recommended repeal or amendment, with a response due 11-7-2025; the Excel index (current to 7-14-2026) marks a response received (copy only by Public Records Act request), and the dashboard shows no later Fairfield ADU letter through its newest row (9-23-2026). If Ords. 2020-05, 2021-14 and 2023-04 never reached HCD, Gov. Code 66326(d) (SB 9, Stats. 2025 ch. 510, effective 1-1-2026) declares an ordinance not submitted within 60 days of adoption null and void, leaving the state standards alone; whether that reaches pre-2026 adoptions is untested, and the practical differences are the attached-ADU ceiling (see maxSize) and the local 30-day rental clause (the residential use tables still bar transient lodging).
  • Pending rewrite: the '2026 ADU Ordinance Update' had a Planning Commission study session on draft ADU regulations on 8-26-2026, and a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for New Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations was still listed as a future Commission item on 9-9-2026; no ordinance reached the Council through its 9-15-2026 agenda, the Council's next meeting is 10-20-2026, and a regular ordinance (two readings, effective 30 days after adoption) could not take effect before December 2026 unless adopted as an urgency measure. Re-verify every field once the Commission hearing and Council adoption occur.
  • Unit-count conflict: (D)(1)(a) allows 'one detached ADU and one JADU, or one ADU' on single-family, duplex and duet lots, but Gov. Code 66323(a) requires ministerial approval of any combination of a conversion ADU (with or without a JADU) and a detached new-construction ADU of up to 800 sq ft, which HCD's 10-8-2025 letter restated; state law controls. From 1-1-2027, AB 956 (Chapter 791, Statutes of 2026) amends 66323 to allow two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot on the exempt path (no JADU owed where two exist), so the local count falls further behind.
  • Height and size conflicts: the 16-ft cap in (D)(2)(a)(iii) applies to every ADU, below the state floors of 25 ft for attached ADUs and 18 ft for detached ADUs near major transit or on multistory multifamily lots (66321(b)(4)); the attached 50 percent cap yields to the 850/1,000 sq ft interior-livable-space floors and the 800 sq ft guarantee (66321(b)(2)-(3)), and the code measures building area to the exterior walls while the state floors use interior livable space.
  • Code-violation precondition: (B)(4) requires illegal building additions or accessory structures on the parcel to be brought into compliance before a non-exempt ADU is approved, which Gov. Code 66322(b) and 66323(c) bar unless the violation threatens public health and safety or is affected by the ADU; unpermitted ADUs and JADUs built before 1-1-2020 also have the state legalization path in 66311.7 (formerly 66332).
  • JADU owner occupancy: the universal clause in (G) yields to Gov. Code 66333(b), so owner occupancy applies only to a JADU that shares a bathroom with the main home; the (H) deed restriction remains required for every JADU (66333(c)).
  • Impact fees: (F)(2) exempts JADUs and ADUs 'less than 750 square feet' and charges ADUs '750 square feet or larger' proportionately to the main home, against Gov. Code 66311.5(c)(1), which exempts ADUs with 750 sq ft of interior livable space or less (a one-square-foot conflict at exactly 750 sq ft, plus the measurement difference); from 1-1-2027 SB 1117 (Chapter 809, Statutes of 2026) limits impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft to the area above 750 sq ft. Water connection charges for ADUs follow the fixture-unit rule of § 22.20.060(C) (Ord. 2025-13). The 'ADU Residential Fee Schedule' linked from the city ADU page is a Building Division handout with fees effective 11-25-2020 (stale; not curated).
  • Review layers: listed historic properties need substantial compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's guidelines ((B)(6)) and Table 25-18 routes minor alterations to historic places, including new accessory structures, through administrative Minor Discretionary Review; the Hillside (H) overlay calls for findings (§ 25.28.4(E)); both yield to Gov. Code 66317 for ADUs. Lots inside the Suisun Marsh Primary or Secondary Management Area need a Marsh Development Authorization for any structure, with a Director's public hearing, CEQA routing and BCDC notice (§ 25.40.7); because it implements the Suisun Marsh Preservation Act of 1977, whether 66317 displaces it for ADUs is unsettled.
  • Design standards in (D)(3) (materials, color, style and form similar to the main home when visible from the street, decorative cladding otherwise, clerestory side windows within 15 ft of a property line, 40 percent driveway frontage) cannot be applied to state-exempt units (66323(b)), and the 'similar ... style' language is not fully objective as 66314(b)(1) requires.
  • SB 9 interplay (§ 25.20.3.4, Ord. 2023-02): a two-unit SB 9 project on an existing parcel may add up to two ADUs; after an urban lot split each new parcel may hold two units of any kind, ADUs and JADUs included, but none where a lot split is combined with a two-unit project; lot-split applicants sign a three-year owner-occupancy affidavit and SB 9 units must be rented for longer than 30 days.
  • Agriculture (AG) district: Table 25-13 permits single-family homes but has no ADU row, while § 25.20.4.11(D)(1)(a) allows ADUs wherever a single-family dwelling is a permitted use and Gov. Code 66314 covers any area zoned for single-family use; confirm with Planning for AG-zoned lots.
  • Stale and legacy sources: the city ADU page narrates only Ords. 2020-05 and 2021-14 (no mention of Ord. 2023-04, the state-law overrides or the 2026 update) and links the 2020 fee handout; the Pre-Approved ADU Program page (Building Safety, the AB 1332 program) still lists local plans as 'coming soon' and links Information Bulletin IB-12 (December 2024); § 25.20.4.11 cites legacy Gov. Code 65852.2 and 65852.22 (now 66310 to 66342 after SB 477). The city code moved from Code Publishing to eCode360 (FA4438); old codepublishing.com links land on a General Code redirect stub.

Summarized from Fairfield's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Fairfield with 119 nearby cities

ADU regulations

California statewide law also applies

California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See California statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Fairfield has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Fairfield?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.