City · California

ADU rules in Fullerton

3 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Fullerton: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Allowed

Detached ADUs are permitted with an existing or proposed home on any lot where single-family or multifamily dwellings are allowed: Table 15.17.020(A) lists ADUs (including JADUs) in R-1, R-2, R-G, R-3R, R-3, R-4 and R-5, including the R-1P, R-2P and R-3P preservation variants, and 15.17.100(D) adds planned residential development districts, specific plan areas, lots where homes are conditionally permitted, and O-P (Office Professional) lots improved with a single-family home. The local track allows one ADU plus one JADU on a single-family lot, and R-1 or R-2 lots of at least one acre may have two detached ADUs (or one attached and one detached) if water and sewer capacity can support them. Separately, the city must ministerially approve a new detached unit of up to 800 sq ft with 4 ft side and rear setbacks under Gov. Code 66323, which state law lets an owner combine with a conversion ADU and a JADU. The R-MH (mobile home) zone does not list ADUs.

FMC § 15.17.100(D), (E), (E)(1), (F)(3)(a), (H)(1)(b) and Table 15.17.020(A) (Ord. 3343, adopted 6-17-2025); Gov. Code 66323(a)
Attached or internal ADU
Allowed

An ADU may be within, attached to, or detached from an existing or proposed single-family or multifamily home or accessory structure, including garages, and may be built above an existing lawfully constructed structure within the height limits. Units built inside an existing or proposed single-family home have no size cap, and one JADU of up to 500 sq ft is allowed within a single-family home (an attached garage counts), also on a lot that has an ADU. Conversions also qualify for the state-exempt path (one ADU and one JADU within existing or proposed space, with up to 150 sq ft of accessory-structure expansion for access), and converted garages need no replacement parking.

FMC § 15.17.100(F)(3)(a), (F)(3)(c), (F)(4)(a)3., (F)(6)(c), (G)(1), (H)(1)(a); § 15.04.040 (JADU definition)
Maximum size
1,200 sq ft detached; attached 850 sq ft (studio or 1 bedroom) or 1,000 sq ft (2+ bedrooms); conversions inside the home uncapped; 16 ft detached (18 ft near transit), 25 ft attached

A detached ADU may not exceed 1,200 sq ft (a conversion of an existing accessory structure already larger than that keeps its size), and an attached ADU is capped at 850 sq ft for a studio or one bedroom and 1,000 sq ft for two or more bedrooms, with no percentage-of-home cap. ADUs inside a single-family home are uncapped, JADUs are limited to 500 sq ft, and an existing house of 1,200 sq ft or less may be redesignated as the ADU when a new home is built on the lot. Heights are 16 ft for a detached ADU, 18 ft within a half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor (plus 2 ft to match the main roof pitch) or on a lot with a multistory multifamily building, and 25 ft or the zone limit, whichever is lower, for an attached ADU (two stories maximum). Lot coverage, FAR, open space, front setback and minimum lot size limits are waived as needed to allow an 800 sq ft ADU, and the state-exempt detached unit is capped at 800 sq ft. The code does not say how square footage is measured; since SB 543 the state floors of 850 and 1,000 sq ft are interior livable space, which the attached caps track exactly.

FMC § 15.17.100(F)(2)(a), (F)(4)(a), (F)(11), (H)(1)(b); § 15.04.040 (JADU); Gov. Code 66321(b), 66323(a)(2)
Owner occupancy
Not required

No owner-occupancy requirement applies to ADUs, and Gov. Code 66315 forbids one. The codified JADU deed restriction still requires the owner to live in either the primary dwelling or the JADU in every case, but since 1-1-2026 Gov. Code 66333(b) (as amended by AB 1154) permits that requirement only when the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the house, and 15.17.100(A)(4) lets mandatory state law control. A JADU with its own bathroom therefore carries no owner-occupancy duty, though the recorded deed restriction (no separate sale, size limit, binding on successors) still applies.

FMC § 15.17.100(A)(4), (G)(8)(d); Gov. Code 66315, 66333(b)
Extra parking
1 space per ADU with a bedroom unless exempt; none for studios, JADUs, conversions, state-exempt units, or within 1/2 mile of transit

An ADU needs one off-street space in addition to the primary dwelling's parking unless it has no bedrooms (a studio needs none); the space may be tandem on the driveway and may sit in the front setback. No space is required when the ADU is within one-half mile walking distance of public transit (a bus stop counts), within a historic district or preservation zone, part of the existing or proposed home or an accessory structure, where on-street permits are required but not offered, within one block of a car-share vehicle, or applied for together with a new home on the lot. Garages, carports or open spaces removed or converted for an ADU need not be replaced, and JADUs need no parking. The state-exempt units in 15.17.100(H) carry no parking requirement because Gov. Code 66323(b) bars any standard that section does not authorize; the local text is silent on this point.

FMC § 15.17.100(F)(6), (G)(5); Gov. Code 66314(d)(10), 66322(a), 66323(b)
Approval process
Permitted use

ADU and JADU applications are approved or denied ministerially within 60 days of a complete application (30 days for a city pre-approved plan or a plan identical to one approved in the current building code cycle), and an application not acted on within 60 days is deemed approved; the state-exempt units in 15.17.100(H) get a ministerial building permit in any residential or mixed-use zone. Section 15.17.100(A)(4) makes the ADU section prevail over conflicting Title 15 provisions, which matters because the general site plan triggers (15.47.020 for new construction in residential zones and 15.17.060(B)(2)(a) for new units in the R-1P, R-2P and R-3P preservation zones) would otherwise route ADUs to site plan review. Gov. Code 66317 bars discretionary review or a hearing for any ADU.

FMC § 15.17.100(A)(4), (B)(1), (H)(1); §§ 15.17.060(B)(2), 15.47.020; Gov. Code 66317, 66323(a)
Rental restrictions
Long-term rentals allowed; ADUs and JADUs may not be rented for less than 31 days (no short-term rentals); no separate sale

ADUs and JADUs may be rented long term but not for periods of less than 31 days, so neither can be used as a short-term rental; for the state-exempt units the 31-day floor matches Gov. Code 66323(e) and 66333(g) (terms longer than 30 days). For an ordinary local-track ADU the 31-day floor runs one day past Gov. Code 66315, which lets a city require only terms of 30 days or longer, and the JADU deed restriction separately says 30 days; both texts are recorded because the difference is a single day. ADUs may not be sold separately from the primary dwelling except under Gov. Code 66341 (qualified nonprofits) or 66342, and no FMC provision supplies the condominium-conveyance ordinance 66342 requires. The citywide short-term rental permit program (15.55.020(F)) is frozen for pending and new permits by urgency Ords. 3342 and 3346 until about 5-17-2027, and a single ADU rental owes no rental business tax (4.06.025(A) applies to four or more units).

FMC § 15.17.100(G)(8)(c), (H)(3), (I), (J); § 15.55.020(F); § 4.06.025(A); Urgency Ords. 3342 (5-20-2025) and 3346 (7-15-2025); Gov. Code 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342
The fine print: 9 caveats that can change the picture
  • Operative text is FMC § 15.17.100 as repealed and replaced by Ord. 3343 (introduced 6-3-2025, adopted 6-17-2025 on a 4-0 vote with one member absent, effective 30 days after passage), codified on American Legal in version 2026 S-1 (local legislation through Ord. 3352) and carried into the recodified Municipal Code by Ord. 3356 (adopted 5-5-2026). The city ADU page still labels the ordinance 'Not Codified'.
  • State law overrides local text in four places: the universal JADU owner-occupancy deed restriction in (G)(8)(d) yields to Gov. Code 66333(b); the one-ADU-plus-one-JADU single-family cap in (E) and the (H)(1) list yield to Gov. Code 66323(a), which allows the exempt units 'or any combination' (a conversion ADU, a JADU and an 800 sq ft detached ADU together); the (F)(6) parking rule and the (F)(7) exact-match materials and roof-slope rules cannot be applied to 66323 units (66323(b)); and the impact-fee exemption for ADUs 'less than 750 square feet' falls one square foot short of Gov. Code 66311.5(c)(1) (750 sq ft of interior livable space or less) and still cites renumbered 66324.
  • Chaptered 2026 law: AB 956 (Ch. 791, Stats. 2026, effective 1-1-2027) raises the 66323 exempt-pathway count to two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot (no JADU owed where two exist), overriding the one-unit text of 15.17.100(H)(1)(b) from that date; SB 1117 (Ch. 809, Stats. 2026, effective 1-1-2027) limits impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft to the area above 750 sq ft, overriding the proportional formula in 15.17.100(C)(2)(b). Re-check both on or after 1-1-2027.
  • Size measurement: 15.17.100 gives sizes in square feet without a measurement rule and FMC § 15.04.040 measures FLOOR AREA within exterior walls, while Gov. Code 66321(b) (as amended by SB 543) and 66323(a)(2)(A) state the 850/1,000 sq ft floors and the 800 sq ft exempt unit in interior livable space; measured from exterior walls the attached caps would fall below the state floor, so interior livable space controls.
  • Historic properties: the R-1P, R-2P and R-3P preservation zones keep their own review (15.17.060(B)(2)(a) site plan review for new units and a 35 to 40 percent floor-area cap in 15.17.060(C)(4)), which 15.17.100(A)(4) and (F)(11) override for ADUs; an ADU on a California Register property must meet the 'objective standards' of 15.48.070, a section built on the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Landmarks Commission site plan review, which state law limits to objective standards applied ministerially (Gov. Code 66314(b)(1), 66317). The 10-6-2026 council agenda introduces a zone change adding the P designation to the Lower Golden Hill neighborhood (R-1-7.2 to R-1-7.2P).
  • Other limits: 15.17.100(L) bars new local-track ADUs (not 66323 units) in areas the City Engineer maps as having insufficient water or sewer service (the city ADU page links no such map); on a lot created by an SB 9 urban lot split an ADU or JADU is allowed only if the lot ends with no more than two units (15.17.100(N)); the R-MH zone does not list ADUs; and the separate-sale clause's reference to Gov. Code 66342 is not a qualifying condominium opt-in.
  • HCD: no ADU review letter to Fullerton appears in HCD's Excel index (current to 7-14-2026) or on the Power BI dashboard (read 2026-10-06; only 2023 Housing Element letters and a 5-4-2026 Housing Accountability Act notice on a builder's remedy appeal). No public record shows whether Ord. 3343 reached HCD within 60 days of adoption (Gov. Code 66326(a)); if it did not, 66326(d) (in force since 1-1-2026) would make it void and the state standards would govern.
  • Short-term rentals: urgency Ord. 3346 extended the citywide moratorium on pending and new STR permits for 22 months and 15 days from 7-2-2025 (to about 5-17-2027) while staff drafts a revised STR ordinance; ADUs and JADUs are excluded from short-term rental by 15.17.100(I) regardless. Re-check the moratorium status around 5-17-2027.
  • Link fragility: American Legal regenerated Fullerton's document ids with the 2026 recodification (the city STR page's link to doc 0-0-0-10683 now answers 404 on render-doc), so the 15.17.100 deep link (doc 0-0-0-12820) may rot at a future regeneration; the citation FMC § 15.17.100 (Title 15, Chapter 15.17) is the recovery path.

Summarized from Fullerton's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Fullerton with 119 nearby cities

ADU regulations

California statewide law also applies

California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See California statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Fullerton has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Fullerton?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.