City · California

ADU rules in Ontario

4 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Ontario: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Allowed

Detached ADUs are allowed on residential lots citywide: Table 5.02-1 lists Accessory Dwelling Units as P (permitted) in every residential district (AR-2, RE-2, RE-4, LDR-5, MDR-11, MDR-18, MDR-25, HDR-45), in the MU-1 subareas and MU-3, MU-6, MU-8B, MU-8C and MU-8E, and in the AG overlay, and Ontario Development Code (ODC) 5.03.010, amended and restated in full by Urgency Ord. 3323 (adopted December 16, 2025, effective immediately), sets two tracks. Class 1 units follow Gov. Code 66323 in any residential or mixed-use district: one new detached ADU of up to 800 sq ft of livable space with 4-foot side and rear setbacks on a single-family lot (combinable with a conversion ADU and a JADU), and on multifamily lots up to two detached ADUs with a proposed building or up to eight, never more than the existing unit count, with an existing one. Class 2 units follow Gov. Code 66314-66322 on any lot zoned for single-family or multifamily use and must meet subsection F: 850 or 1,000 sq ft, one story and 16 feet, 4-foot side and rear setbacks, front setbacks of 30 feet from arterials and 20 feet from other streets, zone lot-coverage caps (30 to 60 percent on traditional single-family lots), matching materials and roof slope, window screening and evergreen landscape screening, none of which may push a unit below 800 sq ft. The main exception is the Ontario International Airport safety zones (see caveats).

Ontario Development Code § 5.03.010.D.3.a(2), D.3.a(4), D.3.b, E.1, E.2, F.1-F.10 (Urgency Ord. 3323); Table 5.02-1 (§ 5.02.010); Gov. Code §§ 66314, 66321(b), 66323(a)
Attached or internal ADU
Allowed

Attached and conversion ADUs are allowed on the same lots. As Class 1 units, one ADU may be created within the proposed or existing space of a single-family home or within an existing accessory structure (plus up to 150 sq ft to accommodate ingress and egress) together with one JADU, and on multifamily lots at least one converted ADU, up to 25 percent of the existing units, may be built in non-livable space such as storage rooms, boiler rooms, attics, basements or garages (D.3.a(1) and (3)). Class 2 attached additions may reach 25 feet or the zone's height limit, whichever is lower, and two stories, and are capped at 850 or 1,000 sq ft of interior livable space and at 50 percent of the existing primary dwelling's floor area, but never below 800 sq ft (E.2.d, F.1). JADUs (up to 500 sq ft of interior livable space inside a single-family structure, an attached garage counting as part of it, with an efficiency kitchen) are allowed only on lots zoned for single-family residences (C.5, E.1.c); the city's ADU page adds that they are not permitted on lots with multifamily dwellings or multiple single-family dwellings or inside detached accessory structures.

Ontario Development Code § 5.03.010.C.5, D.3.a(1), D.3.a(3), E.1.c, E.2.d, F.1.b-F.1.c (Urgency Ord. 3323); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(3)-(4), 66323(a)(1), (a)(3), 66333
Maximum size
850 sq ft (studio or 1 bedroom) or 1,000 sq ft (2+ bedrooms) of interior livable space; attached also capped at 50% of the home (never below 800 sq ft); state-exempt detached unit 800 sq ft; JADU 500 sq ft; detached 16 ft and one story on the local track

For Class 2 ADUs, ODC 5.03.010.F.1 caps size at 850 sq ft of interior livable space for a studio or one-bedroom unit and 1,000 sq ft for two or more bedrooms, attached units are further limited to 50 percent of the existing primary dwelling, and the percentage cap, front setbacks, lot coverage and open-space rules may not push a unit below 800 sq ft of interior livable space (F.1.c). The Class 1 detached unit is capped at 800 sq ft of livable space (D.3.a(2)) and a JADU at 500 sq ft of interior livable space (C.5.a). Heights (E.2): 16 feet for detached units, 18 feet within half a mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor plus 2 feet to match the main roof pitch (20 feet maximum), 18 feet on a lot with a multistory multifamily building, and 25 feet (or the zone limit) and two stories for attached units, measured from existing legal grade or the lowest floor, whichever is lower. Class 2 detached units are also held to one story (F.10), a limit Ord. 3323 added; Gov. Code 66315 bars standards beyond those in 66314, and HCD's April 22, 2026 findings on San Bernardino's identically worded clause called a one-story limit unlawful where two stories fit the height limit, but HCD has not reviewed Ontario's text. The size caps sit exactly at the Gov. Code 66321(b)(2)-(3) floors as amended by SB 543, so the state's 1,200 sq ft detached default in 66314(d)(5) does not apply while the ordinance stands.

Ontario Development Code § 5.03.010.C.5.a, D.3.a(2), E.2, F.1, F.10 (Urgency Ord. 3323); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(4)-(5), 66315, 66321(b), 66323(a)(2)
Owner occupancy
Not required

No: ODC 5.03.010.E.7.a states that ADUs are not subject to an owner-occupancy requirement, matching Gov. Code 66315. For a JADU, a natural person with legal or equitable title must live in the main home or the JADU only when the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the main home; the requirement falls away when the JADU has its own bathroom or the property is owned by another governmental agency, land trust or housing organization (E.7.b), tracking Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by AB 1154 effective January 1, 2026. A JADU deed restriction (no separate sale, approved size and attributes) must be recorded before the JADU's certificate of occupancy (E.8). The city's ADU FAQ handout (Rev. 01.21.2025), still linked from the ADU page, prints the superseded universal JADU owner-occupancy rule.

Ontario Development Code § 5.03.010.E.7, E.8 (Urgency Ord. 3323); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66333(b)-(c)
Extra parking
1 space per ADU or per bedroom (whichever is less) for locally regulated (Class 2) ADUs, waived within 1/2 mile walk of public transit and for units inside the home or an accessory structure; none for state-exempt units or JADUs; no replacement parking

For Class 2 ADUs, ODC 5.03.010.F.6.a requires one off-street space per ADU or per bedroom, whichever is less, which may sit in setback areas or be tandem. No space is required within half a mile walking distance of public transit (defined in C.11 to include any fixed-route, set-fare bus stop or train station), in an architecturally and historically significant historic district, for a unit that is part of the home or an accessory structure, where on-street permits are required but not offered to the occupant, within one block of a car-share stop, or when the ADU is filed with a new home and meets one of those tests (F.6.b, tracking Gov. Code 66322(a)). Subsection F does not apply to Class 1 (Gov. Code 66323) units or JADUs, and garage, carport or uncovered spaces demolished for or converted to an ADU never need replacement (F.6.c; Gov. Code 66314(d)(11)), which ODC 6.01.010.F.8 carries as an exception to its replacement-garage rule. Ord. 3323 relaxed the 2025 text (Ord. 3299), which required one space per ADU regardless of bedroom count.

Ontario Development Code § 5.03.010.C.11, F.6 (Urgency Ord. 3323); § 6.01.010.F.8; Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a), 66323(b)
Approval process
Permitted use

Every ADU and JADU that meets subsection E (and, for Class 2 units, subsection F) is allowed with only a building permit (ODC 5.03.010.D.1): the city must decide completeness within 15 business days, approve or deny within 60 days of a complete application or the application is deemed approved, and consider ADU and JADU permits without discretionary review or a hearing, with written appeals of an incompleteness finding or a denial to the Planning Commission decided within 60 business days (D.2), tracking Gov. Code 66317 as amended by SB 543. Subsection I adds an optional conditional use permit route for an ADU that does not meet the objective standards, the same clause HCD found unlawful in its April 22, 2026 findings on San Bernardino's identical text (Gov. Code 66316 bars discretionary processes). Applications go through the Building Department's Citizen Portal Access with Planning, Engineering, Fire and utility (OMUC) review; the city offers no city-standard plans, and a private vendor's city-preapproved plan gets plan check within 30 days of a complete submittal.

Ontario Development Code § 5.03.010.D.1-D.2, I (Urgency Ord. 3323); Gov. Code §§ 66316, 66317; city ADU page and Preapproved ADUs subpage
Rental restrictions
Long-term rental allowed; rentals shorter than 30 days banned in ADUs and JADUs, so no short-term rental use; no separate sale except the Gov. Code 66341 nonprofit path (no ADU-condo ordinance)

ADUs and JADUs may be rented but not for a term shorter than 30 days, a ban that applies regardless of when the unit was created (ODC 5.03.010.E.4); state law independently requires terms longer than 30 days for Class 1 units (Gov. Code 66323(e)) and JADUs (66333(g)), so even a 30-day rental is out for those units. An ADU or JADU may not be sold or conveyed separately from the lot and primary dwelling except under the Gov. Code 66341 qualified-nonprofit path (E.5), and the council record from 2025 through September 15, 2026 shows no Gov. Code 66342 ADU-condominium ordinance. Citywide, short-term rentals need a short-term rental permit and business license and are limited to hosted and un-hosted stays at the host's primary residence (un-hosted stays capped at 90 days a year) in listed residential and mixed-use zones, while vacation rentals are prohibited (ODC 5.03.363.B, I). Long-term rental units over seven years old fall under the Systematic Health and Safety Inspection Program (OMC Title 8, Chapter 17; the city page cites inspections every four years and a $51 annual fee per unit). Ord. 3323 also deleted the 2025 text's annual rent-reporting duty for ADU owners.

Ontario Development Code § 5.03.010.E.4-E.5 (Urgency Ord. 3323); § 5.03.363.B, I; Ontario Municipal Code Title 8, Chapter 17; Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342
The fine print: 10 caveats that can change the picture
  • Operative text is ODC 5.03.010 as amended and restated by Urgency Ord. 3323 (File PDCA25-004, adopted 5-0 and effective December 16, 2025); the posted Chapter 5.0 (Rev. 08.18.2026) prints it word for word. The city is re-adopting it by regular ordinance under PDCA26-003 (Planning Commission hearing September 22, 2026; Council introduction scheduled October 20 and final action November 3, 2026), which the staff report says makes no further change to 5.03.010 but would relabel the Table 5.02-1 ADU row from P to C/P to reflect the subsection I conditional use permit path. Re-check after adoption (suggested trigger 2026-11-15) and swap the Chapter 5.0 PDF link for the new revision, because superseded chapter PDFs stay online at their old dated paths.
  • HCD's ADU letter index (header 'current as of 7/14/2026') holds no letter of any kind for Ontario, so no HCD findings are on record against Ord. 3299 (2025) or Ord. 3323; later letters would appear only on HCD's online dashboard. Ord. 3323 directed the City Clerk to submit it to HCD within 60 days, a step Gov. Code 66326(d) (SB 9, 2025) now makes a condition of validity, and the submittal could not be confirmed from public records; if the ordinance were void, the state standards alone would apply (for example a 1,200 sq ft detached cap under Gov. Code 66314(d)(5) and no one-story limit).
  • 5.03.010 follows the same Class 1/Class 2 template as San Bernardino's Ord. MC-1659, and HCD's April 22, 2026 findings on that city's text called identically worded clauses unlawful: the one-story limit for Class 2 detached units (F.10), the conditional use permit path for nonconforming ADUs (I), impact fees on an ADU of exactly 750 sq ft (G.1.a and G.1.c, while Gov. Code 66311.5(c)(1) exempts 750 sq ft or less), the 600-foot California Register visibility rule (F.9), the direct line-of-sight and clerestory-window rules (F.7.f and F.7.g), the 10-foot interior dimension and 7-foot wall height (F.7.e), height measured from the lowest floor (E.2.e), the 'above grade' qualifier on the 18-foot multifamily height (E.2.c) and a setback exception that omits converted living area (F.2.b). HCD has not reviewed Ontario's text, so these remain adopted local rules; applicants can still invoke the state provisions directly.
  • Airport overlays: Table 5.02-1 subjects property in the Ontario International Airport influence area to the ONT Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (adopted April 19, 2011, July 2018 amendment). Its Policy S1 makes new residential development incompatible in all five safety zones, with Policy S1b allowing a second unit as defined by state law only in Safety Zones 2, 3 and 4, so ADUs are effectively barred in Safety Zone 1 (the runway protection zones) and Safety Zone 5; inside the projected CNEL 65 dB contour a home with a second unit is allowed only on a legal lot of record as of the plan's 2011 adoption (Policies N1, N2c and SP2a, whose by-right protection excludes Safety Zones 1 and 5 and the CNEL 70 dB contour) and habitable rooms must be attenuated to an interior CNEL of 45 dB (N4a). The Chino Airport plan (Development Code Reference I, CNO overlay) expressly allows a secondary dwelling unit even on a nonconforming single-family parcel (Policies SP2b and SP3a).
  • Ontario Ranch and other specific plan areas: an adopted specific plan governs where it conflicts with the Development Code (ODC 1.01.035). The three Ontario Ranch plans sampled (The Avenue, amended March 18, 2025; Edenglen; Countryside) list 'Granny Flats (i.e. Second Dwelling Units, in accordance with the City's Development Code)' as permitted accessory uses, so 5.03.010 governs there; other specific plans were not checked. Covenants, HOA CC&Rs included, that effectively prohibit or unreasonably restrict an ADU or JADU on a single-family-zoned lot are void, though reasonable restrictions remain enforceable (Civ. Code 714.3).
  • In the AG (Agricultural) Overlay, an interim agricultural district where new construction other than farm buildings and single-family homes on lots of 10 acres or more first requires a specific plan, ODC 6.01.035.C.1.i(2) still allows one 'accessory dwelling unit or guesthouse, not to exceed one per lot' that must meet the main structure's setbacks (15 feet side and rear, 25 feet front) and cites a stale section number (5.03.030). The later-restated 5.03.010 (4-foot side and rear setbacks, ADU plus JADU combinations) and Gov. Code 66314(d)(7) and 66323(a) control.
  • Table 5.02-1 shows '---' for ADUs in MU-8D even though multifamily dwellings are permitted there; 5.03.010.E.1 (Class 1 units in any residential or mixed-use district, Class 2 units on any lot zoned for single-family or multifamily use) and Gov. Code 66314 and 66323(a) control. The table lists no commercial or industrial district for ADUs.
  • Stale city material: the ADU FAQ handout (Rev. 01.21.2025) linked from the ADU page predates Ords. 3296, 3299 and 3323 and prints superseded rules (universal JADU owner occupancy, two detached ADUs on multifamily lots, one parking space per ADU, sizes not measured as interior livable space); it is not curated. The ADU page itself (last modified January 21, 2025) states no superseded numbers.
  • On a lot created by an SB 9 urban lot split, no more than two units of any kind, ADUs and JADUs included, may be built (ODC 6.08.060, unit standards).
  • 2026 state law: SB 1117 (Chapter 809, Statutes of 2026) and AB 956 (Chapter 791, Statutes of 2026) were signed on September 29, 2026 and take effect January 1, 2027. From that date AB 956 amends Gov. Code 66323 so the state-exempt pathway allows two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot, with no JADU owed where two exist, and extends the Civ. Code 714.3 and 4751 CC&R anti-restriction rule to any lot zoned to allow single-family use; SB 1117 amends Gov. Code 66311.5 so impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft are charged only on the area above 750 sq ft. From January 1, 2027 the fee change alters the proportional formula in G.1.c and the exempt pathway requires two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot where D.3.a(2) allows one; until then the current text governs.

Summarized from Ontario's ordinance text, read September 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Ontario with 119 nearby cities

ADU regulations

Short-term rental rules

Planning to rent your ADU on Airbnb or VRBO? Ontario regulates short-term rentals separately; check these before counting on nightly rental income.

California statewide law also applies

California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See California statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Ontario has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Ontario?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.