City · California

ADU rules in Palmdale

2 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Palmdale: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Allowed

Detached ADUs are allowed wherever homes are: PMC 17.91.010(B) allows ADUs in any zone where single-family or multifamily units are allowed, Table 17.35.020-1 lists ADUs and JADUs as an accessory use ('A', allowed as a secondary use alongside a primary use, with no use permit) in the ER, LDR, SFR 1-3 and RN 1-4 residential zones, and Table 17.54.020-1 permits them ('P') in the MU 1-3 mixed-use zones. A single-family lot may have one detached, new-construction ADU with 4-foot side and rear setbacks (17.91.010(D)(1)(b)), and a lot with an existing multifamily building up to eight detached ADUs, never more than the number of existing units (17.91.010(D)(2)(b), raised from two by Ord. 1658 in July 2025). New detached units need 4-foot interior side, street side and rear setbacks and, where feasible without precluding an 800 sq ft unit, the zone's front setback, 10 feet of separation from other buildings and a spot in line with or behind the home's front wall ((F)(4)-(5)); they also follow the objective 17.37.010 single-family design standards where applicable ((F)(7)). Governing text: 17.91.010 as amended by Ord. 1667 (adopted May 5, 2026, effective June 5, 2026); Gov. Code 66314 and 66323(a)(2) and (a)(4) give the same answer.

PMC § 17.91.010(B), (D)(1)(b), (D)(2)(b), (F)(4), (F)(5), (F)(7) (Ords. 1603, 1658, 1667); PMC § 17.35.010(C)(2), Table 17.35.020-1, Table 17.54.020-1; Gov. Code §§ 66314, 66323(a)(2), (a)(4)
Attached or internal ADU
Allowed

Attached additions and conversions are allowed on the same lots. Under 17.91.010(D)(1)(a) one ADU and one JADU may be created within an existing or proposed single-family home or accessory structure, with up to a 150 sq ft expansion for ingress and egress, and an attached addition is limited by floor area rather than barred ((F)(3)(a)). JADUs (up to 500 sq ft, entirely within a single-family residence, 17.16.100) are allowed only in single-family dwellings and not in multifamily developments, while on a lot with an existing multifamily building non-habitable space such as storage rooms, attics, basements or garages may become ADUs up to 25 percent of the existing units ((D)(2)(a)). Attached units may reach 25 feet or the zone's height limit, whichever is lower, and need not exceed two stories ((F)(9)(d)); a second-floor ADU on a single-family lot must have no open stairway and must be converted space, attached to a home that meets all primary-dwelling standards, or built over a code-compliant two-car garage ((F)(8)). Governing text: 17.91.010 as amended by Ord. 1667; Gov. Code 66314(d)(3)-(4) and 66323(a)(1) and (a)(3) give the same answer.

PMC § 17.91.010(B), (D)(1)(a), (D)(2)(a), (F)(3)(a), (F)(8), (F)(9)(d), (G) (Ord. 1667); PMC § 17.16.100; Tables 17.35.020-1, 17.54.020-1; Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(3)-(4), 66323(a)(1), (a)(3), 66333
Maximum size
1,200 sq ft detached; attached the greater of 850 sq ft (0-1 bedroom) or 1,000 sq ft (2+ bedrooms) and 50% of the existing home; JADU 500 sq ft; height 16 ft detached (18 ft near major transit or on multistory multifamily lots), 25 ft attached

17.91.010(F)(3) caps a detached ADU at 1,200 sq ft and an attached ADU at the higher of 850 sq ft (zero or one bedroom) or 1,000 sq ft (two or more bedrooms) and 50 percent of the existing single-family home; a 150 sq ft ingress and egress addition to a converted accessory structure does not count, a JADU is capped at 500 sq ft (17.16.100), and lot coverage, open space and floor area ratio limits may not preclude an 800 sq ft ADU with 4-foot side and rear setbacks ((F)(12)). Heights under (F)(9) are 16 feet for a detached unit, 18 feet within one-half mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor plus 2 feet to match the main roof pitch, 18 feet on a lot with a multistory multifamily building, and 25 feet or the zone limit (whichever is lower) for an attached unit, exactly the Gov. Code 66321(b)(4) floors. Ord. 1667 struck the former 800 sq ft cap on detached ADUs beside existing multifamily buildings after HCD's February 11, 2026 Finding 4, so the general 1,200 sq ft detached cap now applies there (HCD reads Gov. Code 66323(a)(4) units as carrying no size cap at all). Governing text: 17.91.010 as amended by Ord. 1667; its caps equal the state defaults in Gov. Code 66314(d)(4)-(5) and 66321(b)(2), so the value holds under either the local text or the state standards.

PMC § 17.91.010(F)(3), (F)(9), (F)(12) (Ords. 1603, 1658, 1667); PMC §§ 17.16.100, 17.17.050(A); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(4)-(5), 66321(b), 66323(a)(2), (a)(4); HCD findings letter, February 11, 2026, Finding 4
Owner occupancy
Not required

No: nothing in 17.91.010 requires the owner of a lot with an ADU to live there, and Gov. Code 66315 bars owner-occupancy conditions on ADUs. For JADUs, Ord. 1667 rewrote 17.91.010(G)(1) to track Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by AB 1154: the owner must live in the house or the JADU only when the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the primary dwelling, and never when the owner is a governmental agency, land trust or housing organization. Ord. 1667 also limited the recorded covenant in (E)(4) to JADUs (no separate sale, no rentals under 31 days, compliance with (G)), answering HCD Findings 5 and 7 of February 11, 2026; before June 5, 2026 the code required a covenant for every ADU and owner occupancy for every JADU, and the city's ADU handout still says a JADU owner must always live on site. Governing text: 17.91.010 as amended by Ord. 1667, which matches Gov. Code 66315 and 66333(b).

PMC § 17.91.010(E)(4), (G)(1) (Ord. 1667); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66333(b)-(c); HCD findings letter, February 11, 2026, Findings 5 and 7
Extra parking
1 space for an ADU with a bedroom (none for studios); none within 1/2 mile walk of public transit, in historic districts, for units inside the home or an accessory structure, near car share, where street permits are not offered, or when filed with a new home; none for JADUs; no replacement parking

17.91.010(F)(6)(a) requires one space in addition to the primary home's parking unless the ADU has no bedrooms (a studio needs none), and the space may be tandem on an existing driveway or in a setback area where the city finds that feasible. No space is required within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, in an architecturally and historically significant district, for an ADU that is part of a proposed or existing primary residence or accessory structure, where on-street permits are required but not offered, within one block of a car-share vehicle, or when the ADU is filed with a permit for a new single-family or multifamily home ((F)(6)(b)), mirroring Gov. Code 66322(a). Garages, carports and covered or uncovered spaces demolished or converted for an ADU need not be replaced ((F)(6)(c); Ord. 1658 added uncovered spaces in 2025), JADUs need no parking ((G)(3)), and 17.87.020(C) and Table 17.87.060-1 defer to 17.91.010. Governing text: 17.91.010 (unchanged by Ord. 1667); the one-space rule sits at the Gov. Code 66314(d)(10) ceiling of one space per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less, so the value holds under either text.

PMC § 17.91.010(F)(6), (G)(3) (Ords. 1603, 1658); PMC § 17.87.020(C), Table 17.87.060-1; Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a), 66334(a)
Approval process
Permitted use

ADUs and JADUs are approved ministerially: 17.91.010(E)(1) says an application meeting the section's standards 'shall be approved pursuant to PMC § 17.26.030 (Zoning clearance review) and Government Code Section 66323, as applicable', and 17.20.010(A)(2) and Table 17.20.010-1 make zoning clearance an administrative decision by the Director, which may be made without notice to neighbors, with appeals to the Planning Commission and City Council. The city's Standard ADU Plans page gives the sequence (an Accela account, a Zoning Clearance Review with Planning, then a building permit with Building and Safety) and offers free pre-approved conceptual plans of 608, 749, 1,000 and 1,106 sq ft that still need full construction documents. The code does not restate the Gov. Code 66317 clocks (a completeness decision within 15 business days, approval or denial within 60 days of a complete application, deemed approved otherwise), which apply directly. Governing text: 17.91.010 as amended by Ord. 1667 together with Gov. Code 66316 and 66317; the permit path is ministerial under either.

PMC § 17.91.010(E)(1) (Ord. 1667); PMC §§ 17.20.010(A)(2), Table 17.20.010-1, 17.26.030; Gov. Code §§ 66316, 66317
Rental restrictions
Long-term rental allowed; no rentals under 31 days for ADUs and JADUs; rented units must register with the city rental inspection program and carry a business license; no separate sale except the Gov. Code 66341 nonprofit path (no ADU-condo ordinance)

ADUs and JADUs may be rented, but 17.91.010(E)(3) bars rental periods of less than 31 days and the JADU covenant repeats the rule ((E)(4)(b)); Palmdale has no separate short-term rental ordinance. Gov. Code 66315 lets a city require rentals of 'terms 30 days or longer' for ADUs approved under Gov. Code 66314, so the local floor is one day stricter than that authority, while Gov. Code 66323(e) and 66333(g) themselves require terms longer than 30 days for state-exempt units and JADUs. A rented ADU or JADU is a 'residential rental unit' under the Comprehensive Residential Rental Unit program (PMC 8.40.015, as amended by Ord. 1634 in 2024): the owner must register it within 60 days of the property first including a rental, schedule an inspection, obtain a certificate of compliance and hold a City business license, with newly built units exempt from the registration fee (8.40.020 to 8.40.035). ADUs and JADUs may not be sold or conveyed separately from the primary residence except as Gov. Code 66340 et seq. allow ((E)(2)), which leaves the Gov. Code 66341 qualified-nonprofit path; the city has adopted no Gov. Code 66342 ADU-condominium ordinance. Governing text: 17.91.010 as amended by Ord. 1667; if that ordinance were held void under Gov. Code 66326(d), only the state over-30-day terms for 66323 units and JADUs would remain.

PMC § 17.91.010(E)(2)-(4) (Ord. 1667); PMC §§ 8.40.015, 8.40.020, 8.40.030, 8.40.035(B)(6); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(1), 66315, 66323(e), 66326(d), 66333(g), 66341, 66342
The fine print: 10 caveats that can change the picture
  • Which text governs: HCD's February 11, 2026 findings letter (response due March 10, 2026) listed seven problems in 17.91.010 as it stood after Ord. 1658: legacy Gov. Code 65852.2-family citations, the one-ADU-plus-one-JADU cap on single-family lots, the 800 sq ft cap on detached units beside multifamily buildings, the recorded covenant for every ADU, the sprinkler wording, universal JADU owner occupancy, and the 2025 bills (AB 130, AB 462, AB 1154, SB 9, SB 543). HCD's letter index (header 'current as of 7/14/2026', read 2026-09-28) records no city response to it or to HCD's December 5, 2025 technical assistance letter, and the city's staff reports never mention HCD. The city answered by amendment: Ord. 1667 (ZOA 26-0002; Planning Commission March 19, 2026; hearing continued April 7; introduced and adopted 5-0 by the charter city on May 5, 2026; effective June 5, 2026) addressed Findings 3 through 7 and updated most citations. If the city missed the 30-day window, Gov. Code 66326(d) made the earlier text null and void until the city adopts a compliant ordinance and meets the HCD submittal rule; whether Ord. 1667 reached HCD within 60 days is not public. This entry records 17.91.010 as amended by Ord. 1667; every value except the local 31-day rental floor for Gov. Code 66314 units is the same under the state standards.
  • Codification differs from the adopted exhibit in three unmarked places: the Ord. 1667 exhibit joins (D)(1)(a) (conversion ADU plus JADU) and (D)(1)(b) (detached ADU) with 'and', says applications 'shall be approved ministerially', and calls multifamily conversion space 'Uninhabitable', while eCode360 (current through May 5, 2026) keeps the pre-amendment 'or', omits 'ministerially' and says 'Nonhabitable'. The redline's base text evidently differed from the codified text and General Code applied only the marked edits. The difference is not substantive: PMC 17.12.070(G) reads 'or' as 'singly or in any combination', and Gov. Code 66323(a) requires ministerial approval of any combination of a conversion ADU, a JADU and a detached ADU on a single-family lot in any case.
  • Remaining gaps against current state law after Ord. 1667 (Gov. Code 66325 makes the state text control where they conflict): legacy citations survive in (E)(4)(a) (65852.2(a)(1)(D)), (F)(11)(b) (65852.2) and the conflicts clause (H), which names 65852.2 and 65852.22 and should be read as Gov. Code 66310 to 66342; (E)(6)(b) exempts ADUs 'less than 750 square feet' from impact fees while Gov. Code 66311.5(c) exempts units with 750 sq ft or less of interior livable space; (E)(3)'s 31-day minimum is one day beyond the 30-day term Gov. Code 66315 authorizes; (D)(2) covers only lots with an existing multifamily building, while Gov. Code 66323(a)(4)(A)(iii) also allows two detached ADUs with a proposed multifamily dwelling; (E)(2) cites Gov. Code 66340 (Article 4's definitions) for the conveyance exception that 66341 supplies; and the (F)(8) second-story conditions sit uneasily with the 25-foot attached-unit floor in Gov. Code 66321(b)(4)(D).
  • Stale official copies: the 'ADU Program Overview & FAQs' handout linked from the city's Standard ADU Plans page (DocumentCenter 17381) and Forms & Resources page (15305, the stored directory link) is one byte-identical file created November 1, 2023 and last modified November 6, 2024, and the Spanish version (15556, February 2024) matches it. Both print pre-2025 rules: one ADU per single-family lot, two detached ADUs of up to 800 sq ft on multifamily lots, and owner occupancy for every JADU. Neither is curated.
  • Zones: ADUs and JADUs are accessory uses in the ER, LDR, SFR 1-3 and RN 1-4 zones and permitted in MU 1-3 (ADUs only, not JADUs, in multifamily developments), but are not permitted ('-') in the MH mobile home zone or the PF and OS zones. In the SP zone the adopted specific plan governs uses and development (17.74.020), so master-planned communities follow their own plans, subject to Gov. Code 66323's ministerial approval rule in any residential or mixed-use zone.
  • SB 9 lots: on a lot created by an urban lot split that used the two-unit development provision, only two primary units are allowed and ADUs and JADUs are not permitted (17.39.040(A)(1); 17.39.060 affidavit), and SB 9 units carry their own 31-day rental minimum (17.39.040(B)).
  • Utilities and fees: ADUs, and JADUs with their own bathroom, may connect to a septic system only with County of Los Angeles Public Health approval ((E)(6)(a)); a separate utility connection and capacity charge is required only for a unit built with a new single-family home ((E)(6)(c)); no impact fees apply below 750 sq ft ((E)(6)(b)), though the city handout warns that park and school fees may apply. Floor area is measured 'from the outside perimeter of the interior walls' (17.17.050(A)), close to the interior livable space measure Gov. Code 66321(b) now uses for the 800, 850 and 1,000 sq ft floors.
  • Design and state-exempt units: ADUs must meet the objective single-family design standards of 17.37.010 where applicable, except 17.37.010(G), (H) and the two-car-garage rule ((F)(7)), and the 'where feasible' front setback, 10-foot separation and front-wall location rules of (F)(4)-(5) yield whenever they would preclude an 800 sq ft unit. Gov. Code 66323(b) bars any standard beyond 66323's own (size, height, 4-foot setbacks) on state-exempt units.
  • 2026 state law: SB 1117 (Chapter 809, Statutes of 2026) and AB 956 (Chapter 791, Statutes of 2026) were signed on September 29, 2026 and take effect January 1, 2027. From that date AB 956 amends Gov. Code 66323 so the state-exempt pathway allows two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot, with no JADU owed where two exist, and extends the Civ. Code 714.3 and 4751 CC&R anti-restriction rule to any lot zoned to allow single-family use; SB 1117 amends Gov. Code 66311.5 so impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft are charged only on the area above 750 sq ft. From January 1, 2027 the two-unit exempt count goes beyond 17.91.010(D)(1)(b); until then the current text governs.
  • Re-verify by early 2027: check HCD's letter index and dashboard for a Palmdale response, a submittal of Ord. 1667, or new findings on it; the council record (palmdale.granicus.com) for any further 17.91.010 amendment, since Ord. 1667 left legacy citations and SB 543 items open; and whether eCode360 corrects the (D)(1) and (E)(1) wording to match the adopted exhibit.

Summarized from Palmdale's ordinance text, read September 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Palmdale with 119 nearby cities

ADU regulations

California statewide law also applies

California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See California statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Palmdale has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Palmdale?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.