City · California
ADU rules in Rancho Cucamonga
These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Rancho Cucamonga: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.
Rules at a glance
Detached ADUs are allowed on every lot zoned for single-family or multifamily use with an existing or proposed home: 17.100.020 applies Chapter 17.100 to all such lots, Table 17.30.030-1 lists Accessory Dwelling Unit as P (permitted by right) in the VL, L, LM, M, MH and H residential zones, Hillside Residential (HR) and Open Space Conservation (OSC), and Table 17.136.020-1 permits them in all eleven form-based zones of Article VIII (they are not permitted in the Neo-Industrial, Industrial Employment, Parks and Flood Control/Utility Corridor zones). Chapter 17.100, restated in full by Ord. No. 1049 (adopted December 3, 2025, effective January 2, 2026), offers the Gov. Code 66323 'Category 2' unit (one new detached ADU of up to 800 sq ft with 4-foot side and rear setbacks on a single-family lot, combinable with a JADU) and a locally regulated detached ADU of up to 1,200 sq ft under 17.100.060. On multifamily lots, 'Category 4' allows up to eight detached ADUs with an existing building (never more than its existing unit count) or two with a proposed one. A Bonus ADU program (17.100.050, a Prohousing Designation commitment) allows one additional attached, detached or converted ADU on single-family lots of at least 20,000 sq ft, reviewed ministerially.
Rancho Cucamonga Municipal Code (RCMC) §§ 17.100.020, 17.100.040(B), (D), 17.100.050, 17.100.060 (Ord. No. 1049); Table 17.30.030-1 (§ 17.30.030); Table 17.136.020-1 (§ 17.136.020); Gov. Code §§ 66314, 66323(a)(2), (a)(4)Attached and conversion ADUs are allowed on the same lots. 'Category 1' (17.100.040.A, tracking Gov. Code 66323(a)(1)) allows one ADU within the existing or proposed space of a single-family home or an existing accessory structure, with up to 150 sq ft of expansion limited to ingress and egress, plus one JADU; 'Category 3' allows at least one ADU, and up to 25 percent of the existing unit count, in non-livable space of an existing multifamily building such as storage rooms, attics, basements or garages. New attached additions under the local standards may reach 50 percent of the main home or 1,200 sq ft, whichever is less, and 25 feet in height (Table 17.100.050-1). JADUs of 220 to 500 sq ft must sit entirely within the walls of a single-family home (attached garages count as part of the home), need their own exterior entry and an efficiency kitchen, and are not allowed in accessory structures (17.100.070).
RCMC §§ 17.100.040(A), (C), 17.100.060(F) (Table 17.100.050-1), 17.100.070 (Ord. No. 1049); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(3)-(4), 66323(a)(1), (a)(3), 66333Table 17.100.050-1 in 17.100.060.F caps locally regulated ADUs at 1,200 sq ft detached and, for attached units, at 50 percent of the main dwelling or 1,200 sq ft, whichever is less, with minimum sizes of 350 sq ft detached and 220 sq ft attached; garages and other optional accessory structures do not count toward the cap. Heights are 16 feet for detached units, 18 feet (or 20 feet to match the main roof pitch) within half a mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor, 18 feet on a lot with a multistory multifamily building, 25 feet for attached units, and the zone's limit for an ADU built above a garage. The state-exempt Category 2 detached unit is capped at 800 sq ft and 16 feet (18 feet near major transit, plus 2 feet to match the roof pitch), JADUs at 500 sq ft, and lot coverage and front setbacks yield where they would block an 800 sq ft, 16-foot ADU with 4-foot side and rear setbacks (17.100.060.G, H.2). The local text has no such floor for the 50 percent attached cap, but Gov. Code 66321(b)(3) forbids a percentage-based limit that does not allow at least 800 sq ft of interior livable space and 66325 makes the state article supersede conflicting local text, so an attached ADU on a home smaller than 1,600 sq ft may still reach 800 sq ft.
RCMC §§ 17.100.040(B), 17.100.060(F) (Table 17.100.050-1 and notes 1-4), (G), (H), 17.100.070(A) (Ord. No. 1049); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(4)-(5), 66321(b), 66323(a)(2), 66325No for ADUs: Chapter 17.100 imposes no owner-occupancy condition on an ADU, and Gov. Code 66315 bars one. For JADUs, 17.100.090.C (Ord. No. 1049) still requires the owner to live in the rest of the home or in the JADU in every case, exempting only a governmental agency, land trust or housing organization owner. Since January 1, 2026, Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by AB 1154 allows that condition only where the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the house, and 66339.5(a) makes the state JADU article supersede a conflicting local ordinance, so a JADU with its own bathroom carries no owner-occupancy requirement. Ord. No. 1049 was adopted December 3, 2025, after AB 1154 was chaptered (Stats. 2025, ch. 507) but before it took effect, and HCD's December 5, 2025 technical assistance letter to the city listed exactly this change; the city's May 2024 handbook also states a JADU owner-occupancy requirement without the sanitation distinction.
RCMC § 17.100.090(C) (Ord. No. 1049); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66333(b), 66339.5(a); HCD letter to the City of Rancho Cucamonga, December 5, 2025New detached ADUs built under the local standards must provide one off-street space (17.100.060.I.1), which may be tandem, in an enclosed garage or in setback areas; a space in a garage shared with the main home must be walled off with its own door, and access must use the main dwelling's driveway unless the lot has alley or permitted corner-lot access. No space is required within a one-half mile walk of public transit (any bus stop or train station), in an architecturally and historically significant district, for a unit that is part of the existing or proposed home or an existing accessory structure, where on-street permits are required but not offered, within one block of a car-share station, or when the ADU is filed with a new home (17.100.060.I.5, mirroring Gov. Code 66322(a)). The text sets no requirement for attached additions, the state-exempt units of 17.100.040 or JADUs (17.100.070.F), and one space per unit is the Gov. Code 66314(d)(10) ceiling. Garage, carport or covered spaces lost to an ADU need not be replaced (17.100.060.I.4); Gov. Code 66314(d)(11) extends that to uncovered spaces and carries no 'as long as the ADU remains in use as a legal ADU' qualifier.
RCMC §§ 17.100.060(I), 17.100.070(F) (Ord. No. 1049); Gov. Code §§ 66313(m), 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a), 66323(b)Every ADU and JADU needs only a building permit checked against the Building Standards Code, Gov. Code Chapter 13 and Chapter 17.100 (17.100.030.A), and Table 17.30.030-1 lists ADUs as P, permitted by right. The city must approve or deny within 60 days of a complete application (17.100.030.B, whose citation to 'Government Code Section 63317' is a typo for 66317), no minor exception may be granted or even accepted for processing (17.100.030.C), an ADU filed with a home that needs discretionary review is decided separately without discretionary review or a hearing (17.100.030.D), and Bonus ADUs are ministerial too (17.100.050.D). Detached ADUs using a city-preapproved plan must be decided within 30 days (17.100.030.E), and Resolution No. 2026-024 (April 15, 2026) set a $1,363 plan-review fee for preapproved ADU plans against $2,063 for a standard ADU of up to 1,200 sq ft. State law adds the 15-business-day completeness determination and a written appeal to the governing body or planning commission decided within 60 business days (Gov. Code 66317(a)(2), (d)), which the local text does not restate. In the Hillside Overlay Zone or on slopes of 8 percent or more, 17.16.140 routes projects through hillside development review and its small-project exception excludes ADUs; Gov. Code 66317(a)(1) and (c) confine ADU review to objective, ministerial standards (see caveats).
RCMC §§ 17.100.030, 17.100.050(D) (Ord. No. 1049); § 17.30.030(B)(1) and Table 17.30.030-1; § 17.16.140(B)-(C); City Council Resolution No. 2026-024 (April 15, 2026); Gov. Code §§ 66316, 66317ADUs may be rented, but 17.100.090.B requires any rental of an ADU or JADU to run longer than 30 consecutive days, which Gov. Code 66315 permits and 66323(e) and 66333(g) require for state-exempt units and JADUs. Citywide, Chapter 8.34 (Ord. No. 969, 2020) allows short-term rentals only as hosted or un-hosted stays at the host's primary residence under a city permit ($201 application fee on the city's page), business license and transient occupancy tax certificate; vacation rentals are prohibited, un-hosted stays are capped at 90 days a year, and 8.34.090.G separately bars short-term use of an ADU bound by a covenant against rentals of 30 days or less. Separate sale of an ADU is prohibited except under the qualified-nonprofit tenancy-in-common path of Gov. Code 66341 (17.100.090.A). The city has not adopted a Gov. Code 66342 ADU-condominium ordinance, and 17.100.090.A.6 says the section 'does not imply' a condominium sale is allowed outside those nonprofit conditions.
RCMC § 17.100.090(A)-(B) (Ord. No. 1049); Chapter 8.34, §§ 8.34.020, 8.34.090(B), (G), (K) (Ord. No. 969); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342The fine print: 11 caveats that can change the picture
- Which text governs: Chapter 17.100 as restated by Ord. No. 1049 (adopted December 3, 2025 on a 4-0-1 vote, effective January 2, 2026, codified on eCode360 current through Ord. No. 1057 of July 15, 2026) is the operative local text, with state law controlling where they conflict (Gov. Code 66325 for ADUs, 66339.5 for JADUs). HCD's ADU letter index (header 'current as of 7/14/2026', read 2026-09-28) lists one Rancho Cucamonga letter, a December 5, 2025 technical assistance letter noting that the newest ordinance HCD had on file dated from 2020 and asking for a response by January 4, 2026; the index marks it 'Response received' (the response is available only by Public Records Act request) and shows no findings letter on Ord. No. 1049. Section 8 of the ordinance directed submission to HCD within 60 days; had it not been submitted, Gov. Code 66326(d) would make it null and void and the state standards would apply alone. Letters after mid-July 2026 appear only on HCD's Power BI dashboard, which could not be read.
- State-law divergences in the local text (state law controls): the universal JADU owner-occupancy clause (17.100.090.C) against Gov. Code 66333(b), which since January 1, 2026 allows it only with shared sanitation; the 50 percent attached-ADU cap with no 800 sq ft floor against 66321(b)(3); the 350 sq ft detached minimum against 66321(b)(1), which bars a minimum size that prohibits an efficiency unit (the city's own ADU definition in 17.140.020 includes efficiency units under Health and Safety Code 17958.1); Category 2 text that pairs the 800 sq ft detached unit only with a JADU, while 66323(a) as amended by SB 543 allows any combination of the (a)(1) conversion ADU, the JADU and the (a)(2) detached unit; and a replacement-parking clause (17.100.060.I.4) that omits uncovered spaces and adds 'as long as the ADU remains in use as a legal ADU', against 66314(d)(11). Local size caps are stated as floor area, while the state floors in 66321(b) are measured in interior livable space. HCD has issued no findings on any of these points.
- Stale official copies (not curated): the Planning page links an 'Accessory Dwelling Unit Handbook' updated May 21, 2024 (/sites/default/files/2024-06/RC%20ADU%20Handbook_Updated%205.21.24.pdf), the city's 'Accessory Dwelling Units' news page (May 22, 2024) links a Calameo copy of it, and the September 2023 edition still serves from both www.cityofrc.us and the testweb.cityofrc.us staging host. All predate Ord. No. 1049: they cap multifamily lots at two detached ADUs (now up to eight), tie attached-ADU height to the house or 16 feet (now 25 feet), omit the Bonus ADU program and cite pre-2025 section numbers such as 17.100.050(J). The city has no current ADU program page; 17.100.030.E says preapproved plans are posted under Building and Safety, but none were posted on September 28, 2026.
- Special planning areas: under 17.30.020.E-F an overlay's or special planning area's use rules prevail over the base zone, and The Resort's Table 17.38.060-1 prints a blank 'Accessory dwelling unit' row and 'Dwelling, second unit' as N (not permitted) in every placetype, while the Etiwanda Heights Neighborhood and Conservation Plan table (17.38.070) has no ADU row at all. Chapter 17.100 applies to every lot zoned for residential use (17.100.020) and Gov. Code 66323(a) requires ministerial approval of the state-exempt units in any residential or mixed-use zone, so those tables cannot bar ADUs; confirm with Planning for projects in The Resort, Etiwanda Heights or the planned communities and specific plans of Article VI, whose own documents were not reviewed.
- Hillside areas: 17.16.140 requires hillside development review for projects in the Hillside Overlay Zone (generally north of Hillside Avenue, plus the Red Hill and Beryl Hill areas) and on properties with slopes of 8 percent or more, and its exception for small additions and accessory structures expressly excludes ADUs. Gov. Code 66317(a)(1) requires ministerial approval without discretionary review and 66317(c) bars any other local ordinance from being a basis for delay or denial, so hillside review of an ADU can apply only objective standards; ask Planning how such an application is processed.
- Fire and equestrian areas: Rancho Cucamonga Fire Protection District Ord. No. FD60 (adopted November 19, 2025, effective January 1, 2026) designated the State Fire Marshal's Fire Hazard Severity Zones and established a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area; there an ADU must meet wildland-urban interface construction rules (California Residential Code R337, the Class A roofing of RCMC 15.12.050 and 15.14.060 in Very High zones), and the city's handbook asks for a defensible-space landscape plan on the city's north side. The Equestrian Overlay Zone (roughly the area north of Banyan Street west of Milliken Avenue and north of State Route 210 east to Interstate 15, up to the northern sphere boundary) regulates animal keeping and trail dedication and has no ADU rule. Neither overlay changes ADU size, parking or allowance in the code text.
- SB 9 lots: no ADU or JADU is allowed on a parcel created by an urban lot split where the subdivider also uses the two-unit authority of Gov. Code 65852.21 (17.36.020.F.2), and SB 9 projects must record covenants barring rentals of less than 31 days and, for lot splits, an owner-occupancy affidavit (17.36.020.J).
- Fees: the storm drain fee chapters exempt an ADU only up to 650 sq ft (13.08.060.C, 13.09.090), while Gov. Code 66311.5(c)(1) bars impact fees on ADUs of 750 sq ft of interior livable space or less and requires proportional fees above that; the state threshold controls. The Building and Safety AB 1332 page lists homeowners associations among bodies that may review plans before permits issue; HCD's December 5, 2025 letter to the city, summarizing its 2025 handbook update, says third-party HOA review cannot influence ADU approval (Gov. Code 66315, 66317(c)).
- Separate sale: no Gov. Code 66342 ADU-condominium ordinance has been adopted (the city's May 2024 handbook said it had no plans to adopt one); 17.100.090.A.6 says nothing in the section limits condominium conveyance but that it 'does not imply it is allowed outside of meeting all the conditions in this section', which are the Gov. Code 66341 qualified-nonprofit conditions.
- 2026 state law: SB 1117 (Chapter 809, Statutes of 2026) and AB 956 (Chapter 791, Statutes of 2026) were signed on September 29, 2026 and take effect January 1, 2027. From that date AB 956 amends Gov. Code 66323 so the state-exempt pathway allows two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot, with no JADU owed where two exist, and extends the Civ. Code 714.3 and 4751 CC&R anti-restriction rule to any lot zoned to allow single-family use; SB 1117 amends Gov. Code 66311.5 so impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft are charged only on the area above 750 sq ft. Until then the current text governs, and the unit-count and fee notes in this entry describe the pre-2027 rules. Re-read the HCD letter index for any findings on Ord. No. 1049 once it refreshes past July 14, 2026 (suggested re-check 2027-01-31).
- Drafting artifacts in Ord. No. 1049 (not rules): 17.100.030.B cites 'Government Code Section 63317' (meaning 66317); 17.100.090.A.5 cites 66324, which SB 543 renumbered to 66311.5; the size table in 17.100.060.F is still titled 'Table 17.100.050-1'; and 17.100.060.H.2 reads 'at maximum has four-foot side and rear yard setbacks' where 17.100.060.G reads 'at minimum'. The codifier corrected two cross-references in the adopted text (17.100.040.A.4 now points to 17.100.070 and 17.100.040.D to 17.100.060).
Summarized from Rancho Cucamonga's ordinance text, read September 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.
ADU regulations
California statewide law also applies
California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.
See California statewide rulesSpotted something outdated?
Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Rancho Cucamonga has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.
Report a correctionReady to build?
Planning an ADU in Rancho Cucamonga?
Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.