City · California

ADU rules in Richmond

4 sources

These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Richmond: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.

Rules at a glance

Detached (backyard) ADU
Allowed

Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026, effective about 8-27-2026) restated RMC 15.04.610.020 so that ADUs may be built on any legal lot where single-family or multifamily dwellings are permitted and that holds an existing or proposed home. On a single-family lot a state-exempt detached unit of up to 800 sq ft of interior livable space with 4-ft side and rear setbacks is allowed together with a conversion ADU and a JADU (subsection C.1), and local-track detached units of up to 850/1,000 sq ft are allowed one per lot (E.1.a). On multifamily lots the city allows two detached ADUs with a proposed building and, with an existing building, as many as there are existing units up to eight (C.1.c), matching Gov. Code 66323(a)(4). The use tables permit ADUs in RH, RL1, RL2, RM1, RM2, CM-1 to CM-5, LW (limitation L20) and every Form-Based Code transect zone, and OS-H allows them as required by state law; inside the Keller Beach sewer moratorium area of Point Richmond, permits needing a new sewer connection are on hold until about 2-16-2027 (see caveats).

RMC § 15.04.610.020 as restated by Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026), intro and (C)(1)(b)-(c), (E)(1)(a); Tables 15.04.201.020 and 15.04.202.020 (Ord. No. 09-26 N.S.); § 15.04.402.070; § 15.04.206.030; Gov. Code § 66323(a)
Attached or internal ADU
Allowed

Attached additions (sharing at least one common wall or roofline with the living area of the home, entered from the side or rear) and conversions of existing space are both allowed ministerially. A conversion within the proposed or existing space of a single-family home or an existing accessory structure, with up to 150 sq ft of expansion for ingress and egress, is a state-exempt unit with no size cap (C.1.a), and existing multifamily buildings may convert non-livable space such as storage rooms, attics or garages into ADUs numbering up to 25 percent of the existing units, at least one (C.1.d). A JADU of up to 500 sq ft may be created within a single-family home, including an attached garage, on lots zoned for single-family use (E.4). Local-track attached ADUs may reach 25 ft or the zone height limit, whichever is lower, but no more than two stories (E.1.d.iv), the 66321(b)(4)(D) floor that HCD's 2024 findings said the old 16 ft cap violated.

RMC § 15.04.610.020 as restated by Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026), (C)(1)(a), (C)(1)(d), (E)(1)(d)(iv), (E)(2), (E)(4); Gov. Code §§ 66321(b)(4)(D), 66323(a)(1), (a)(3), 66333
Maximum size
850 sq ft (studio/1 bedroom) or 1,000 sq ft (2+ bedrooms) interior livable space; 800 sq ft state-exempt detached unit; conversions uncapped; JADU 500 sq ft; detached 16 ft (18 ft near major transit, +2 ft roof pitch), attached 25 ft or zone height, max two stories

Subsection E.1.c caps every local-track ADU, attached or detached, at 850 sq ft of interior livable space for a studio or one bedroom and 1,000 sq ft for two or more bedrooms, exactly the floors Gov. Code 66321(b)(2) allows, with no percent-of-home cap. Lot coverage, front setback, FAR, open space and size limits are waived to allow an 800 sq ft unit with 4-ft side and rear setbacks (C.6.b), and the state-exempt detached unit is capped at 800 sq ft (C.1.b). Heights follow 66321(b)(4): 16 ft for detached units, 18 ft within one-half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor (plus 2 ft to match the home's roof pitch), 18 ft on lots with a multistory multifamily building, and 25 ft or the zone limit for attached units. The 2020 text (Ord. No. 27-20 N.S.) used the same 850/1,000 caps but a flat 16 ft height limit, and JADUs remain capped at 500 sq ft of interior livable space.

RMC § 15.04.610.020 as restated by Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026), (C)(1)(b), (C)(6)(b), (E)(1)(c)-(d), (E)(4)(c); Gov. Code § 66321(b)(2)-(4)
Owner occupancy
Not required

Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. states that owner occupancy is not required for an ADU or for a JADU with its own bathroom; only where a JADU shares a bathroom with the single-family home must the owner live in the home or the JADU (government agencies, land trusts and housing organizations excepted), mirroring Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by SB 543 and AB 1154. The rewrite also dropped the 2020 requirement to record a deed restriction for every ADU, which HCD's 10-21-2024 findings called an additional standard barred by Gov. Code 66315; a JADU still needs a recorded deed restriction barring separate sale and fixing its size and attributes (C.5.b), and the applicant acknowledges the shared-bathroom occupancy rule in writing (C.5.a.ii). The city's July 2025 ADU Info Sheet still says owner occupancy is required for every JADU, which state law and the new ordinance have replaced.

RMC § 15.04.610.020 as restated by Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026), (C)(3)(a), (C)(5); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66333(b)-(c)
Extra parking
1 space per new local-track ADU with a bedroom (studios none), waived within 1/2 mile of public transit and in the other state exemptions; none for state-exempt units, conversions or JADUs

Subsection E.1.e requires one space per local-track ADU and none for a studio, with tandem parking on an existing driveway or parking in a setback area allowed; Table 15.04.607.040 likewise sets 1 space per dwelling unit or bedroom, whichever is less, unless 15.04.610.020 waives it, and none for a JADU. No parking applies within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, in an architecturally and historically significant historic district, for a unit within the home or an accessory structure, where on-street permits are not offered to the occupant, within one block of a car-share vehicle, or when the ADU is permitted together with a new home (the Gov. Code 66322(a)(6) case HCD found missing in 2024). State-exempt ADUs under subsection C sit outside the E standards, so they need no parking. Spaces lost when a garage, carport or covered structure is demolished or converted need not be replaced; the local list omits uncovered spaces, which Gov. Code 66314(d)(11) also protects, so state law controls there.

RMC § 15.04.610.020 as restated by Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026), (E)(1)(e), (E)(4)(f); RMC Table 15.04.607.040; Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a)
Approval process
Permitted use

ADU and JADU applications go through the building permit process with a ministerial zoning compliance review by the Zoning Administrator and review by the Building Official; no discretionary review or hearing is allowed unless the application includes unrelated work (A). The city must rule on completeness within 15 business days and approve or deny a complete application within 60 days (30 days for pre-approved detached plans), with deemed approval if it misses the 60-day clock, and an applicant may appeal an incompleteness finding or denial to the Planning Commission within ten days for a decision within 60 business days (B), the process Gov. Code 66317(d) requires. Two older overlays still read as discretionary: the Shoreline Overlay (land within 100 ft of the bay shoreline) requires a conditional use permit for all development (15.04.306.030), and the -H and -L historic overlays require a Certificate of Appropriateness (15.04.303.120); the ADU section prevails over conflicting provisions (C.6.a, G) and Gov. Code 66317(a)(1) bars a hearing, but confirm practice there.

RMC § 15.04.610.020 as restated by Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026), (A), (B), (C)(6)(a), (G); RMC §§ 15.04.306.030, 15.04.303.120; Gov. Code § 66317
Rental restrictions
Long-term rentals allowed; no ADU or JADU rentals under 30 consecutive days (state-exempt units and JADUs need terms over 30 days); no separate sale except a qualified-nonprofit TIC; owner-resident ADUs exempt from the Rent Ordinance; rental registration and inspection (new ADUs exempt 5 years) and rental business tax

Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. prohibits renting or leasing an ADU or JADU for fewer than 30 consecutive days and has the owner acknowledge this in writing at application (C.3.b, C.5.a); the home-share rules in 15.04.610.030(A) repeat that ADUs and JADUs may not be rented for periods shorter than 30 days, although an on-site host may live in an ADU while home-sharing bedrooms in the main house. Gov. Code 66323(e) and 66333(g) require terms longer than 30 days for state-exempt units and JADUs, so a rental of exactly 30 days is barred for those units. Neither unit may be sold separately except as a qualified-nonprofit tenancy in common under Gov. Code 66341 (C.4), and the city has not opted into 66342 ADU condominiums. Under Rent Board Regulation 201(C) and RMC 11.100.040(a)(2), a lawful ADU is exempt from rent control and just-cause rules when the owner lives in the larger main home; otherwise the Rent Ordinance's just-cause provisions apply. Non-owner-occupied rentals must register for the Chapter 6.40 inspection program (ADUs exempt for five years after the certificate of occupancy) and pay the Class K residential rental business tax unless the 7.04.210(d)(5) owner-occupant exemption applies.

RMC § 15.04.610.020 as restated by Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (adopted 7-28-2026), (C)(3)(b), (C)(4), (C)(5)(a); RMC §§ 15.04.610.030(A), 11.100.030(d), 11.100.040(a)(2), 6.40.050(d), 7.04.210; Rent Board Reg. 201(C); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341
The fine print: 10 caveats that can change the picture
  • Operative text is the signed, clerk-certified Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. (case PLN25-019; Planning Commission Res. No. 26-15 on 7-2-2026; introduced 7-21-2026, adopted 7-28-2026 with six ayes and Vice Mayor Robinson absent; effective 30 days after final passage, about 8-27-2026), which deletes and replaces RMC 15.04.610.020. Municode Supp. No. 74 (codified through Ord. No. 02-26 N.S. of 3-3-2026) still prints the 2020 Ord. No. 27-20 N.S. text at the 15.04.610.020 node the city ADU page links: a flat 16 ft height cap, a 'located behind the primary dwelling' rule, a recorded deed restriction for every ADU, universal JADU owner occupancy and a one-category-per-lot exempt-unit rule, all replaced. Relink to the Municode node once the supplement codifying Ord. Nos. 09-26 and 11-26 N.S. posts.
  • City handouts are stale and are not curated: the ADU page links the July 2025 ADU Info Sheet (DocumentCenter 75905, 'effective January 1, 2025'), which still requires owner occupancy for every JADU, and the ADU Guidebook (75898, footer marked Final Draft and dated June 5, 2025), which limits single-family lots to one JADU or one detached ADU, caps multifamily detached ADUs at two and misstates the rental rule as 'no ADU shall be rented for a term of 30 days or less'; the 2021 ADU Application Checklist (58399) predates both.
  • HCD: the only ADU letter is the 10-21-2024 findings on Ord. No. 27-20 N.S. (case ADU0007697; 16 numbered findings including the 16 ft height cap, the missing 66322(a)(6) parking exemption, ADU deed restrictions, local historic registers, the 'legally in existence' conversion test and the one-type-per-lot rule; the index shows a response received). Ord. No. 11-26 N.S. answers those points; HCD's dashboard (newest statewide ADU row 9-23-2026) shows no letter on it, and no public record shows the city submitting it to HCD within 60 days (due about 9-26-2026). If it was not submitted, Gov. Code 66326(d) would void it and the state standards would apply alone, including the 1,200 sq ft detached and 50 percent attached caps of 66314(d)(4)-(5).
  • State law still overrides parts of Ord. No. 11-26 N.S.: replacement parking (E.1.e.vii) omits uncovered spaces, which Gov. Code 66314(d)(11) protects; impact fees are waived only below 750 sq ft (F.2.b) while 66311.5(c)(1) bars fees on ADUs of 750 sq ft or less of interior livable space; and the local under-30-day ban leaves 30-day rentals of state-exempt units and JADUs open while 66323(e) and 66333(g) require terms longer than 30 days. Read literally, E.1.a (one local-track ADU per lot) could block a local-track unit beside state-exempt units; HCD has told other cities (Santa Clarita, San Diego County) that a 66314 unit must be allowed in combination with 66323 units.
  • Keller Beach Sanitary Sewer (KBSS) moratorium: Interim Ord. No. 10-25 N.S. (adopted 4-1-2025, extending urgency Ord. No. 06-25 N.S. of 2-18-2025 for 22 months and 15 days from adoption, to about 2-16-2027, with one further one-year extension allowed under Gov. Code 65858) bars building permits requiring a new sewer connection to the KBSS, which serves about 340 lots in Point Richmond along Ocean Avenue, Western Drive and nearby shoreline streets. It has no ADU exception: applications may be processed but no permit issues until it ends, unless the owner funds a City-approved alternative sewer main extension (Section 5.B). HCD approved it under Gov. Code 66300 on 3-26-2025. Conversions and JADUs that need no new connection appear outside it (66311.5(d) bars requiring one for 66323(a)(1) units); confirm with Public Works. The KBSS feasibility study was on the council agenda on 9-22-2026 and again on 10-6-2026; the 9-22 staff report targeted a final report and recommended action in November or December 2026.
  • Discretionary overlays: RMC 15.04.306.030 requires a conditional use permit for all development in the -S Shoreline Overlay (land within 100 ft of the San Francisco Bay and San Pablo Bay shorelines plus the public access zone; for example a new home at 237 Western Drive went to the Planning Commission on 8-6-2026), and 15.04.303.120 requires a Certificate of Appropriateness for development in -H historic districts or on -L landmarks. 15.04.610.020(A), (C)(6)(a) and (G) and Gov. Code 66317(a)(1) keep ADUs ministerial, so either process applied to an ADU would conflict with state law. Attached ADUs on California Register properties must meet objective Secretary of the Interior standards and go behind, then beside, then in front of the main building as feasible (D.6).
  • Zones: ADUs are P in RH, RL1, RL2, RM1, RM2 and CM-1 to CM-5, L20 in LW, and P in every Form-Based Code transect zone (upper floor or behind a ground-floor use in T4MS, T5MS, T5C and T5C-O), whose own standards exclude ADUs (15.04.401.030(A), Ord. No. 04-23 N.S.). The Commercial district table (CG, CR, CC, restated by Ord. No. 09-26 N.S.) has no ADU row even though CR allows attached single-family (A) and multi-unit (L6) dwellings; the ADU section's opening clause and conflict rule should control there. The RMC has no coastal development permit procedure or coastal-zone provisions (zero Municode hits), and its shoreline rules reference BCDC instead, so no coastal-zone ADU track applies.
  • Chaptered 2026 law: SB 1117 (Ch. 809, Stats. 2026) and AB 956 (Ch. 791, Stats. 2026) take effect 1-1-2027. AB 956 lets two detached new-construction ADUs use the 66323 exempt pathway on a single-family lot (no JADU owed where two exist), overriding the single exempt detached unit in C.1.b, and extends the Civil Code CC&R anti-restriction rule; SB 1117 limits impact fees on ADUs over 750 sq ft to the area above 750 sq ft, replacing the F.2.b fee charged proportionately to the primary home. Re-read both after 1-1-2027.
  • Rental programs: Chapter 6.40 (Ord. No. 02-25 N.S., 1-7-2025) requires registration and three-year inspections of non-owner-occupied rental units, with ADUs exempt for five years from the certificate of occupancy (6.40.050(d)); the Class K business tax is $10.81 per $1,000 of gross receipts for owners of four units or fewer, and 7.04.210(d)(5) exempts an owner who lives in a home with one or two ADUs, holds the homeowner exemption, has lived there a year, owns no other Richmond rental and has household income at or below 150 percent of AMI, for tenancies of 30 days or more only. The Rent Ordinance's ADU exemption (11.100.030(d)(5), 11.100.040(a)(2)) still cites the old Small Second Unit Ordinance (former 15.04.810); Rent Board Regulation 201(C), amended 12-15-2021 and 10-25-2023, points it at 15.04.610.020.
  • Re-verification triggers: by 2026-12-15 check Municode (ClientID 11684, productId 16579; job 492251, newOrdCount 6) for the supplement codifying Ord. Nos. 09-26 and 11-26 N.S. and relink 15.04.610.020; by 2027-01-15 check HCD's dashboard for any letter on Ord. No. 11-26 N.S.; after 2-16-2027 confirm whether the KBSS moratorium expired or was extended; after 1-1-2027 apply SB 1117 and AB 956.

Summarized from Richmond's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.

Compare Richmond with 119 nearby cities

ADU regulations

Short-term rental rules

Planning to rent your ADU on Airbnb or VRBO? Richmond regulates short-term rentals separately; check these before counting on nightly rental income.

California statewide law also applies

California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.

See California statewide rules

Spotted something outdated?

Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Richmond has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.

Report a correction

Ready to build?

Planning an ADU in Richmond?

Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.