City · California
ADU rules in San Bernardino
These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in San Bernardino: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.
Rules at a glance
Detached ADUs are allowed on residential lots citywide: Table 04.01 lists Accessory Dwelling Unit as P (permitted) in all eight residential zones (RE, RL, RS, RU, RM, RMH, RH, RSH), and SBMC 19.04.030(2)(P), restated in full by Ord. MC-1659 (adopted February 4, 2026, effective March 6, 2026), sets two tracks. Class 1 units follow Gov. Code 66323 in any residential or mixed-use zone: one new detached ADU of up to 800 sq ft of livable space with 4-foot side and rear setbacks on a single-family lot (combinable with a conversion ADU and a JADU), and on multifamily lots up to two detached ADUs with a proposed building or up to eight, never more than the existing unit count, with an existing one. Class 2 units follow Gov. Code 66314-66322 on any lot zoned for single-family or multifamily use and must meet the local standards of subsection 7: 16-foot height and one story, 4-foot side and rear and 25-foot front setbacks, 45 percent FAR, 50 percent lot coverage, 50 percent minimum open space, matching materials and roof slope, and evergreen screening. HCD's April 22, 2026 findings letter says several of those Class 2 rules, and the ordinance's silence on pairing a Class 2 ADU with the Class 1 units, violate state law.
San Bernardino Development Code (SBMC Title 19) § 19.04.030(2)(P) 5.a.ii, 5.a.iv, 5.b, 6.a, 7 (as restated by Ord. MC-1659); Table 04.01, § 19.04.020; Gov. Code §§ 66314, 66323(a)Attached and conversion ADUs are allowed on the same lots. As Class 1 units, one ADU may be converted within the existing or proposed space of a single-family home or an existing accessory structure (plus up to 150 sq ft for ingress and egress) together with one JADU, and on multifamily lots at least one converted ADU, up to 25 percent of the existing units, may be built in non-livable space such as storage rooms, attics, basements or garages. Class 2 attached additions may reach 25 feet or the zone's height limit, whichever is lower, and two stories, and are capped at 50 percent of the existing primary dwelling's floor area, though never below 800 sq ft of interior livable space. JADUs (up to 500 sq ft of interior livable space inside a single-family structure, with an efficiency kitchen) are allowed only on lots zoned for single-family residences.
SBMC § 19.04.030(2)(P) 3.e, 5.a.i, 5.a.iii, 6.a.iii, 6.b.iv, 7.a.ii-iii (Ord. MC-1659); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(3)-(4), 66323(a)(1), (a)(3), 66333For Class 2 ADUs, 19.04.030(2)(P) 7.a caps size at 850 sq ft of interior livable space for a studio or one-bedroom unit and 1,000 sq ft for two or more bedrooms, with attached units further limited to 50 percent of the existing home; the percent cap, 45 percent FAR, 50 percent lot coverage, 50 percent open space and the 25-foot front setback may not push an ADU below 800 sq ft (7.a.iii). The Class 1 state-exempt detached unit is capped at 800 sq ft of livable space and a JADU at 500 sq ft. Heights (6.b): 16 feet for detached units, 18 feet within half a mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor plus 2 feet to match the main roof pitch, 18 feet on a lot with a multistory multifamily building, and 25 feet (or the zone limit) and two stories for attached units, while Class 2 detached units are held to one story (7.k). These caps sit exactly at the state floors in Gov. Code 66321(b) as amended by SB 543, but HCD found the one-story limit, the 'above grade' qualifier on the multifamily height and the lowest-floor height measurement unlawful, and if MC-1659 is void under Gov. Code 66326(d) the state defaults in 66314(d)(4)-(5) govern instead (attached up to 50 percent of the home, detached up to 1,200 sq ft).
SBMC § 19.04.030(2)(P) 3.e.i, 5.a.ii, 6.b, 7.a-7.e, 7.k (Ord. MC-1659); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(4)-(5), 66321(b), 66323(a)(2), 66326(d)No: 19.04.030(2)(P) 6.g.i states that ADUs are not subject to an owner-occupancy requirement, matching Gov. Code 66315. For JADUs the owner must live in the main home or the JADU only when the JADU shares sanitation facilities with the main home; the requirement falls away when the JADU has its own bathroom or the property is owned by a governmental agency, land trust or housing organization (6.g.ii), tracking Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by AB 1154 effective January 1, 2026. A JADU deed restriction (no separate sale, approved size and attributes) must be recorded before the JADU's certificate of occupancy (6.h). The city's posted February 2025 copy of Chapter 19.04 still prints the superseded MC-1645 clause subjecting every JADU to owner occupancy.
SBMC § 19.04.030(2)(P) 6.g, 6.h (Ord. MC-1659); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66333(b)-(c)For Class 2 ADUs, 19.04.030(2)(P) 7.g requires one off-street space per ADU or per bedroom, whichever is less, which may sit in setback areas or be tandem; no space is required within half a mile walking distance of public transit (defined in 3.k to include any fixed-route, set-fare bus stop), in an architecturally and historically significant district, for a unit within the home or an accessory structure, where on-street permits are not offered to the occupant, within one block of a car-share stop, or when the ADU is filed with a new home that meets one of those tests. Subsection 7 does not apply to Class 1 (Gov. Code 66323) units or JADUs, and garage, carport or driveway spaces removed for an ADU never need replacement (7.g.iii; Gov. Code 66314(d)(11)), which overrides the general replacement-garage rule of 19.24.030(7). This is a reversal: the January 2025 text (Ord. MC-1645) had no ADU parking requirement, while MC-1658U (December 3, 2025) and MC-1659 reinstated one space, matching the state ceiling in Gov. Code 66314(d)(10); HCD's April 2026 findings did not question it.
SBMC § 19.04.030(2)(P) 3.k, 7 (preamble), 7.g (Ord. MC-1659); § 19.24.030(7); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a), 66334Every ADU and JADU needs an ADU permit and a building permit, both ministerial: 19.04.030(2)(P) 4 promises a completeness determination within 15 business days, approval or denial within 60 days of a complete application without discretionary review or a hearing, and written appeals to the Planning Commission decided within 60 business days, tracking Gov. Code 66317 as amended by SB 543. Subsection 10 adds a conditional use permit route for an ADU that does not meet the objective standards; HCD's Finding 16 says no discretionary review is authorized and the city must review all ADU applications ministerially. The city's ADU page offers two pre-approved detached plans (Morning Glory, 462 sq ft; Carnation, 738 sq ft) that still need Planning pre-approval before Building and Safety submittal, and quotes 15 to 20 business days for a first plan review.
SBMC § 19.04.030(2)(P) 4.a-4.c, 10 (Ord. MC-1659); Table 04.01, § 19.04.020; Gov. Code §§ 66316, 66317ADUs and JADUs may be rented separately but not for a term shorter than 30 days, a ban that applies regardless of when the unit was created (19.04.030(2)(P) 6.d); state law independently requires terms longer than 30 days for Class 1 units (Gov. Code 66323(e)) and JADUs (66333(g)), so even a 30-day rental is out for those units. An ADU may not be sold or conveyed separately from the lot and primary dwelling except under the Gov. Code 66341 qualified-nonprofit path (6.e); the city has not adopted a Gov. Code 66342 ADU-condominium ordinance, which HCD encouraged in Finding 7. Citywide, the SBMC does not specifically address short-term rentals (June 17, 2026 staff report): the council introduced a ban (Ord. MC-1661) 4-3 on April 15, 2026, then voted 4-3 on June 17, 2026 to deny its adoption and 6-1 to have staff return with a regulatory program, which had not reached an agenda through September 16, 2026.
SBMC § 19.04.030(2)(P) 6.d, 6.e (Ord. MC-1659); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342; City Council minutes, June 17, 2026, item 8The fine print: 10 caveats that can change the picture
- Which text governs is unsettled: HCD's April 22, 2026 findings letter on Ord. MC-1659 lists 17 numbered findings (16 requiring amendment, one encouraging a Gov. Code 66342 condominium ordinance) and set a May 21, 2026 response deadline. HCD's letter index (header 'current as of 7/14/2026', fetched 2026-09-28) records no city response, and the council agendas (through September 16, 2026) and Planning Commission agendas (through September 8, 2026) show no amending ordinance or findings resolution. Under Gov. Code 66326(d) (SB 9, 2025) an ordinance whose findings go unanswered for 30 days is null and void and the city must apply the state standards until it adopts a compliant ordinance; the city's own January 21, 2026 staff report describes that consequence. This entry records MC-1659 as the city's adopted text; if it is void, the main differences are a 1,200 sq ft detached cap (Gov. Code 66314(d)(5)), no one-story limit, no local 30-day rental minimum for Class 2 units, and none of the flagged design rules.
- HCD's findings on MC-1659 cover: the 'acting on' wording for the concurrent-application delay (4.c.iii.b); silence on combining a Gov. Code 66314 ADU with 66323 units (5.a); the JADU cross-reference that omits 66339.5 (5.a.i); the Class 1 versus Class 2 standards contradiction (5.b and 6); the 'above grade' qualifier on the 18-foot multifamily height (6.b.iii); height measured from the lowest floor instead of the building code definition (6.b.v); the omitted setback exemption for converted living area or accessory structures (7.c.ii); the 10-foot interior dimension and 7-foot wall height (7.h.v); the no-direct-line-of-sight rule (7.h.vi); clerestory or obscure-glass windows within 30 feet of a property line (7.h.vii); the 600-foot California Register visibility rule (7.j); the one-story limit (7.k); impact fees at exactly 750 sq ft (8.a.i and 8.a.iii); the conditional use permit path (10); and the missing Gov. Code 66314(d)(3) configurations standard.
- Stale official copies: the city's Development Code page ('May 1991 (Revised February 2025)') and the '19.04 Residential Zones' PDF that it and the ADU page link (DocumentCenter 2764, created February 22, 2025, footers 'Feb. 2025') still print the January 2025 MC-1645 text: no ADU parking, none of the Class 2 design rules, and universal JADU owner occupancy. American Legal's recodified Municipal Code (version 2026 S-2, current through Ord. MC-1666 passed August 5, 2026) does not carry Title 19 at all; it reserves the title as adopted by reference and points to the city's page. The adopted MC-1659 Exhibit A on the city's PrimeGov portal is the only complete public copy of the current section.
- Zones and overlays: Table 04.01 permits ADUs in every residential zone, Class 1 units may also go in mixed-use zones, and JADUs only on lots zoned for single-family residences. In the Foothill Fire Zones overlay, all new structures, second units included, must meet the fire-zone standards of 19.15.040 (October 2019 text), which among other things set 60-foot (Zone A) and 30-foot (Zone B) minimum separations between structures unless the Fire Chief approves otherwise, and the city's ADU page warns of high-wind, high-seismic and high-fire-severity areas that can add construction requirements.
- Historic resources: MC-1659 7.j requires an ADU on or within 600 feet of a California Register property to be invisible from any public right-of-way (HCD called the rule arbitrary and unreasonable), while 7.g.ii.b exempts ADUs in architecturally and historically significant districts from parking.
- Fees: no impact fee below 750 sq ft of interior livable space and proportional fees above it (HCD says an ADU of exactly 750 sq ft must also be exempt under Gov. Code 66311.5(c)(1)), and no school fees under 500 sq ft; the city's ADU page says a school fee letter is needed at 501 sq ft or more. Converted single-family ADUs and JADUs need no separate utility connection; other ADUs do, at a proportionate capacity charge (8.b).
- Certificates of occupancy and legalization: an ADU cannot receive a certificate of occupancy before the primary dwelling except for a detached ADU in a county under a state-of-emergency proclamation issued on or after February 1, 2025 whose main home was substantially damaged or destroyed (6.j; Gov. Code 66328 as amended by AB 462). Unpermitted ADUs and JADUs built before January 1, 2020 can be legalized under 9.b (AB 2533), and the city publishes an AB 2533 substandard-building checklist.
- Short-term rental policy is in motion: after denying the MC-1661 ban on June 17, 2026 the council directed staff to bring a regulatory program to the first regular meeting in September, and it had not appeared on the September 2 or September 16, 2026 agendas. Any citywide program would not lift the ADU-specific 30-day minimum in 6.d or the state's over-30-day terms for Class 1 units and JADUs.
- 2026 state law: SB 1117 (Chapter 809, Statutes of 2026) and AB 956 (Chapter 791, Statutes of 2026) were signed on September 29, 2026 and take effect January 1, 2027. From that date AB 956 amends Gov. Code 66323 so the state-exempt pathway allows two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot, with no JADU owed where two exist, and extends the Civ. Code 714.3 and 4751 CC&R anti-restriction rule to any lot zoned to allow single-family use; SB 1117 amends Gov. Code 66311.5 so impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft are charged only on the area above 750 sq ft. From January 1, 2027 the two-unit exempt count outruns MC-1659 5.a.ii (one detached unit) and the fee change alters how the proportional formula in 8.a.iii applies; until then the current text governs.
- Re-verify by early 2027: check HCD's letter index and the council record (PrimeGov) for an MC-1659 amendment or findings resolution answering the April 22, 2026 letter, or an HCD notice of violation, and for the short-term-rental program ordinance promised for September 2026.
Summarized from San Bernardino's ordinance text, read September 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.
ADU regulations
- sanbernardino.govOfficial sourceVerified September 2026https://www.sanbernardino.gov/1725/Accessory-Dwelling-Units
- sanbernardino.primegov.comOfficial sourceVerified September 2026https://sanbernardino.primegov.com/api/compilemeetingattachmenthistory/historyattachment/?historyId=ff9e16e4-afc5-4e15-b414-6fd514dd484f
- hcd.ca.govOfficial sourceVerified September 2026https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/policy-and-research/ordinance-review-letters/san-bernardino-adu-findings-042226.pdf
California statewide law also applies
California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.
See California statewide rulesSpotted something outdated?
Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or San Bernardino has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.
Report a correctionReady to build?
Planning an ADU in San Bernardino?
Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.