City · California
ADU rules in San Carlos
These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in San Carlos: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.
Rules at a glance
Detached ADUs are a permitted (P) use in every residential district (RS-3, RS-6, RM-20, RM-59 and RM-100), in all ten mixed-use districts when the lot has a proposed or existing dwelling, and in planned development districts that allow homes. SCMC 18.23.210(D)(2)(c) lists a freestanding unit, a unit within or added onto an existing accessory structure, and a unit over or below a detached garage among the allowed locations. The local count (one ADU per single-family lot, two detached ADUs beside a multifamily building) is overridden by Gov. Code 66323(a), which allows a converted ADU, a detached new-construction ADU and a JADU together on a single-family lot and up to eight detached ADUs (never more than the existing unit count) beside an existing multifamily building, as HCD's 5-6-2026 findings 9 and 11 say.
SCMC § 18.23.210(C), (D)(2); Tables 18.04.020 and 18.05.020; Gov. Code § 66323(a)Attached additions and conversions of space inside the house (including all or part of an attached garage) or inside an existing accessory structure are permitted wherever detached units are. A newly built attached ADU needs 4 ft side and rear setbacks on the first floor and must meet the main home's front setback and the district's second-story setbacks unless it qualifies as a statewide-exemption ADU (the Gov. Code 66323 unit); it may rise 25 ft, and conversions need no setbacks. JADUs of up to 500 sq ft inside the walls of a single-family home are permitted in RS-3 and RS-6 with a recorded deed restriction.
SCMC § 18.23.210(D)(1)-(2), (F)(3), (F)(4)(e), (F)(4)(i); Table 18.04.020Ord. 1604 (2023) struck the earlier 850/1,000 sq ft caps, so SCMC 18.23.210(F)(4)(f) now limits an ADU to the maximum floor area (MFA) the district allows on the lot and, where a home already exists, to 50 percent of that home for attached and detached units alike, with 800 sq ft as the ceiling for a unit that cannot meet every district standard. Up to 800 sq ft of any ADU, and all of a statewide-exemption ADU, is excluded from floor area (18.03.080(B)); only RS-6 has an MFA (lots up to 7,500 sq ft: the greater of 1,100 sq ft plus 35 percent of the lot or 50 percent of the lot; larger lots 50 percent) and RS-3 has none, so there is no fixed square-foot cap, which HCD's handbook says a less stringent local ordinance may do. HCD's March 2026 handbook reads Gov. Code 66321(b)(2) to bar a percentage cap that holds a unit below 850 sq ft of interior livable space (1,000 with more than one bedroom), and 66321(b)(3) and 66323(a)(2) guarantee an 800 sq ft detached unit with 4 ft setbacks. Conversions of existing space are uncapped under 66323(a)(1) even though the local table prints 50 percent or 800 sq ft for them. Heights: detached 18 ft plus 2 ft to match the main roof pitch, 20 ft over a detached garage, attached 25 ft.
SCMC § 18.23.210(F)(4)(b), (c), (f), (i) and Table 18.23.210(E)(4); § 18.03.080(B); Table 18.04.030; Gov. Code §§ 66321(b)(2)-(3), 66323(a)(1)-(2); HCD ADU Handbook (March 2026) pp. 38-39San Carlos imposes no owner-occupancy requirement on ADUs. SCMC 18.23.210(E)(2)(d) still carries the pre-2025 state sunset wording ('For applications received prior to January 1, 2025, there is no owner-occupancy requirement'), but nothing in the code imposes one on later applications, Gov. Code 66315 bars it (HCD finding 16 asks the city to delete the clause), and the city ADU page says ADUs have no owner-occupancy requirement and need no deed restriction. For JADUs, local (E)(1)(d) requires the owner to live in the house or the JADU whenever a lot has both an ADU and a JADU; since 1-1-2026 Gov. Code 66333(b) requires owner occupancy only where the JADU shares sanitation with the home and forbids it where the JADU has its own bathroom or the owner is a government agency, land trust or housing organization, so the local clause yields in those cases (HCD finding 15). A JADU deed restriction barring separate sale and fixing size and attributes is still recorded with the County.
SCMC § 18.23.210(E)(1)(d), (E)(2)(d); Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66333(b)-(c)SCMC 18.23.210(G)(1) and Table 18.20.040-A(3) require one space per ADU on top of the home's two spaces; it may be tandem on a driveway or in a setback area. No space is required for an ADU inside an existing or proposed home or accessory structure, within one-half mile walking distance of public transit (locally any fixed-route bus stop or train station), in an architecturally and historically significant district, where on-street permits are not offered to the occupant, or within one block of a car-share space, and garage or carport spaces lost to an ADU need not be replaced. State law also exempts an ADU applied for together with a new home (66322(a)(6)), lets uncovered spaces go unreplaced (66314(d)(11)) and caps parking at one space per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less (66314(d)(10)(A)), so on a plain reading a studio owes no space. The local rule that a JADU must replace displaced garage parking yields to 66334(a), which bars any additional JADU parking (HCD findings 31 to 33).
SCMC § 18.23.210(B)(4), (G); Table 18.20.040-A(3); § 18.20.050(A); Gov. Code §§ 66314(d)(10)-(11), 66322(a), 66334(a)ADUs and JADUs are permitted (P) uses filed directly with the Building Division and checked by Planning against objective standards; the city ADU page says they 'are reviewed ministerially, meaning a discretionary review or a public hearing is not required', and SCMC 18.29.030(B)(5) says an ADU filed with a new home 'shall be considered without discretionary review or hearing.' Gov. Code 66317 adds the 15-business-day completeness check and the 60-day decision clock. Two local mechanics deserve watching: 18.29.030(B)(2) lets adjacent or facing neighbors ask the Director, within 10 days, to verify compliance with the objective design standards that 18.04.070(B) applies to ADUs, and deviations from objective standards or Hillside Overlay grading rules route to discretionary design review, which state law does not allow for a unit that meets 66314 or 66323. The code's test that an applicant must show no alternative before statewide-exemption waivers apply conflicts with 66323 (HCD findings 21, 23 and 27); the zoning code has no coastal-zone provisions.
Table 18.04.020; SCMC §§ 18.04.070(B), 18.29.020, 18.29.030(B); City of San Carlos ADU page (October 2026); Gov. Code §§ 66316, 66317SCMC 18.23.210(E) lets ADUs and JADUs be rented separately from the home but bars rentals of fewer than 30 consecutive calendar days, a floor Gov. Code 66315 allows for ordinary ADUs; units built under the state-exempt pathway and JADUs must be rented for longer than 30 days (66323(e), 66333(g)), a day stricter than the local text and the city page. ADUs cannot be sold separately 'unless permitted by State law' (the 66341 qualified-nonprofit route; San Carlos has adopted no 66342 condominium opt-in), and JADUs never. There is no short-term rental permit program: stays under 30 consecutive days are the commercial Lodging use (18.40.040(K)), which Table 18.04.020 does not list in any residential district, and any short-term rental booked online owes transient occupancy tax under Chapter 3.24. The code has no rental registration or local rent stabilization chapter (Titles 3, 5, 8, 9 and 18 searched).
SCMC § 18.23.210(E); § 18.40.040(K); Table 18.04.020; Chapter 3.24; Gov. Code §§ 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341The fine print: 13 caveats that can change the picture
- Pending rewrite: the city ADU page (updated October 2026) says the 2026 ADU Ordinance Update, written to align with state law, is scheduled for a Planning and Transportation Commission recommendation on 11-16-2026; council introduction, adoption and a 30-day effective date follow, so re-verify every field from about 2026-12-15 and again when Code Publishing codifies it (book current through Ord. 1637 of 6-22-2026).
- HCD's 5-6-2026 findings letter (ADU0002711) lists 37 conflicts in Ord. 1604 with a response due 6-5-2026; HCD's index (current to 7-14-2026) marks a response received, but no public record dates it, so compliance with the 30-day window in Gov. Code 66326(d) cannot be confirmed. The city still administers 18.23.210, whose clause (A)(3) lets state law control any conflicting provision; HCD's dashboard shows no later ADU letter through 2026-10-08.
- Unit counts: the local one-ADU-per-single-family-lot rule, the two-detached cap on multifamily lots and the rule that an ADU may join a JADU only when the subsection F standards are met all yield to Gov. Code 66323(a) (HCD findings 9, 11, 12 and 14). From 1-1-2027, AB 956 (Ch. 791, Stats. 2026) amends 66323 to allow two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot under the state-exempt pathway, with no JADU where two exist.
- Size measurement: SCMC 18.03.080 measures floor area to the outside of exterior walls, while the state caps and floors (66321(b), 66323(a)(2), the 500 sq ft JADU in 66313(d)) count interior livable space, so the local 800 sq ft statewide-exemption and 500 sq ft JADU figures read slightly stricter than state law (HCD findings 3 and 4).
- The 50 percent cap reaches detached units and, with the 800 sq ft fallback, can hold an ADU beside a home under 1,700 sq ft below the 850/1,000 sq ft interior-livable-space floor that HCD's March 2026 handbook reads into Gov. Code 66321(b)(2); HCD's letter did not raise the point and city practice is undocumented (maxSize low confidence).
- Statewide-exemption units: the code waives lot coverage, MFA, front setback and design standards for an 800 sq ft unit only if the applicant shows no alternative, applies lot coverage and front setbacks to other ADUs, and prints inconsistent heights in Table 18.23.210(E)(4) (no limit for a statewide-exemption unit over a garage); Gov. Code 66321(b)(3) and 66323(a)-(b) control (HCD findings 20 to 29).
- JADUs are not listed in the RM districts (Table 18.04.020) or in any mixed-use district (Table 18.05.020), which conflicts with Gov. Code 66323(a)(1) for a single-family home in those zones; the JADU street-facing entrance, setback and design rules exceed 66333 (HCD findings 17 to 19).
- Parking details: the local exemption list omits the 66322(a)(6) new-home exemption and uncovered replacement spaces (66314(d)(11)); the one-space rule reaches studios despite the per-bedroom ceiling in 66314(d)(10)(A); JADU replacement parking yields to 66334(a); Table 18.20.040-A(3) points to the exemptions at '18.23.210(F)(3)', a drafting error for (G)(3).
- Impact fees: 18.23.210(H)(5) exempts ADUs smaller than 750 sq ft (gross), and the city page repeats it, while Gov. Code 66311.5(c) exempts ADUs of 750 sq ft of interior livable space or less and JADUs up to 500 (HCD finding 34); from 1-1-2027 SB 1117 (Ch. 809, Stats. 2026) limits fees on a larger ADU to the area above 750 sq ft, overriding the local whole-unit proportional formula.
- Hillside Overlay (lots averaging 20 percent slope or more, Chapter 18.12): grading, natural-state, foundation and height rules apply and exceptions go to discretionary Planning and Transportation Commission design review; only statewide-exemption ADUs are exempt from the natural-state limits, and an attached one at the downhill elevation may reach 25 ft.
- Inclusionary link: SCMC 18.16.030(C)(1) requires a new single-unit ownership home, or an addition of 1,000 sq ft or more, to pay the below-market-rate in-lieu fee or build an ADU under 18.23.210, and a legal ADU is itself exempt from the inclusionary rule (18.16.040(A)).
- Legacy numbering and pathways: the section cites Gov. Code 65852 et seq., '65852, subdivision (e)' and 65852.2 (now 66310 to 66342, with the statewide-exemption unit at 66323), and its delay-of-enforcement pathway (I) covers units built before 11-25-2020 with a 2030 sunset, against Gov. Code 66311.7 (units built before 1-1-2020, no sunset) (HCD findings 1, 35 and 36).
- Not read for this entry: the Downtown Specific Plan (Ords. 1632 and 1633, 2026) and Northeast Area Specific Plan (Ords. 1636 and 1637, 2026) documents, whose land-use rules sit outside the codified Chapters 18.14.1 and 18.14.2; confirm ADU treatment there before relying on the mixed-use values.
Summarized from San Carlos's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.
ADU regulations
- cityofsancarlos.orgOfficial sourceVerified October 2026https://www.cityofsancarlos.org/city_hall/departments_and_divisions/community_development/planning/building_an_accessory_dwelling_unit.php
- codepublishing.comOfficial sourceVerified October 2026Municipal Codehttp://www.codepublishing.com/CA/SanCarlos/html/SanCarlos18/SanCarlos1823.html
- hcd.ca.govOfficial sourceVerified October 2026https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/policy-and-research/ordinance-review-letters/san-carlos-adu-findings-050626.pdf
California statewide law also applies
California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.
See California statewide rulesSpotted something outdated?
Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or San Carlos has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.
Report a correctionReady to build?
Planning an ADU in San Carlos?
Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.