City · California
ADU rules in Thousand Oaks
These are the primary sources for accessory dwelling unit regulations in Thousand Oaks: the city's own zoning code, planning department pages, and permit guides. Start here before talking to anyone: the rules below are what your permit reviewer will apply.
Rules at a glance
Detached ADUs are a permitted (P) accessory use in the R-A, R-E, R-O, R-1, R-2, R-3, RPD and HPD zones, and Article 45 allows them on any single-family-zoned lot (R-A, R-E, R-O, R-1, RPD, HPD or a specific plan) with one existing or proposed home. The city must ministerially approve a new detached unit of up to 800 sq ft with 4 ft side and rear setbacks, and each lot may instead use its one local-standards ADU (detached up to 1,000 sq ft), which the code counts against the state-mandated allowance. Lots in the R-2, R-3, RPD and MU zones are limited to the state-mandated units of Sec. 9-4.4511, which include up to eight detached ADUs (capped at the number of existing units) beside an existing multifamily building, or two beside a proposed one. HCD's 6-1-2026 findings call the counting rule and the multifamily-zone limit unlawful because at least one Gov. Code 66314 unit must be allowed on top of every 66323 unit, and Sec. 9-4.4502(b) lets the Government Code prevail. The local text bars ADUs on natural slopes over 25 percent and limits them near protected ridgelines and oaks, and the TPD mobile home park zone does not list ADUs.
TOMC §§ 9-4.2104, 9-4.4502(b), 9-4.4504(a)(1) and (b)(1), 9-4.4509(a) and (c), 9-4.4511(a)(2), (a)(4) and (a)(5) (Ord. 1747-NS, eff. 4-10-2026); Gov. Code 66314, 66323(a)An ADU may be converted from space inside an existing or proposed home or an existing accessory structure (with up to 150 sq ft added for access), or built as an attached addition under the local standards, which require at least 10 ft of shared wall with the house, a full kitchen and bathroom separate from the main home, an exterior entrance on a different wall face than the main entry and no internal connection. Second-story ADUs are allowed with interior stairs only; HCD's 6-1-2026 findings say the exterior-stair ban is unlawful where stairs are needed to use the 25 ft attached height allowance. One JADU of up to 500 sq ft may be created only by converting space within the walls of a single-family home (an attached garage counts) and may sit beside a conversion ADU under Sec. 9-4.4511(a)(1). On multifamily lots, at least one ADU and up to 25 percent of the existing unit count may be created in non-livable space such as storage rooms, attics, basements or garages.
TOMC §§ 9-4.4509(b) and (e), 9-4.4510(b) and (c), 9-4.4511(a)(1) and (a)(3), 9-4.4512(a) and (b) (Ord. 1747-NS); Gov. Code 66321(b)(4)(D), 66323(a)(1) and (a)(3), 66333A local-standards detached ADU may have up to 1,000 sq ft of interior livable space, and an ADU converted within or attached to the house up to 850 sq ft or 50 percent of the existing home's total floor area, whichever is greater; the minimum is an efficiency unit. The state-mandated detached unit is capped at 800 sq ft of interior livable space, detached units on multifamily lots carry no size cap, conversions approved under Gov. Code 66323(a)(1) are limited only by the existing or proposed space, plus up to 150 sq ft for access when an accessory structure is converted (HCD: conversions are not subject to unit size requirements), and a JADU may not exceed 500 sq ft. Heights are 16 ft for a detached ADU, 18 ft within a half mile of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor, plus 2 ft to match the main roof pitch, and 25 ft or the house's zone height limit, whichever is lower, for an attached ADU. A garage attached to a detached ADU is limited to 400 sq ft, patio covers and porches to 10 percent of the ADU's area (not counted), and an accessory structure attached to a detached ADU must fit within the ADU's size cap. Gov. Code 66321(b)(2) bars a maximum below 1,000 sq ft for a unit with more than one bedroom, so on a home under 2,000 sq ft a two-bedroom attached ADU may reach 1,000 sq ft despite the 850 sq ft or 50 percent text.
TOMC §§ 9-4.4509(b)(1), (b)(3), (c)(1) to (c)(5) and (d), 9-4.4511(a)(1), (a)(2) and (a)(4), 9-4.4512(b)(3) (Ord. 1747-NS); Gov. Code 66321(b), 66323(a) and (b)No owner-occupancy requirement applies to ADUs (Gov. Code 66315 forbids one), and the city ADU page confirms that an ADU and the house may be rented to different parties. For JADUs, Ord. 1747-NS limits the requirement to a JADU that shares sanitation facilities with the main home: the owner must then live in either the house or the JADU, and no requirement applies to a JADU with its own bathroom or to an owner that is a governmental agency, land trust or housing organization, matching Gov. Code 66333(b) as amended by AB 1154. The recorded JADU deed restriction (Sec. 9-4.4512(c)) still restates that rule and requires disclosure of it to future owners, which HCD's 6-1-2026 findings say exceeds the two items Gov. Code 66333(c) allows in a deed restriction. The city ADU page still says that any property with a JADU must be owner-occupied, a pre-2026 statement the code has superseded.
TOMC §§ 9-4.4506(c), 9-4.4512(c)(1) and (c)(4) (Ord. 1747-NS); Gov. Code 66315, 66333(b) and (c)The code requires one off-street space for an ADU in addition to the house's parking; it may be covered or uncovered, in any setback and tandem on the driveway, and spaces lost when a garage or carport is converted or demolished for the ADU need not be replaced. No space is required when the ADU is within one-half mile walking distance of public transit, in an architecturally and historically significant historic district, part of the existing or proposed home or an accessory structure or converted from an existing structure, where on-street permits are required but not offered, within one block of a car-share vehicle, applied for together with a new home or multifamily building, or 500 sq ft of interior livable space or smaller. The local text does not exempt the state-mandated units of Sec. 9-4.4511, but Gov. Code 66323(b) bars any standard that section does not authorize (HCD's March 2026 handbook: no parking may be imposed on 66323 units) and Sec. 9-4.4502(b) lets state law prevail. Gov. Code 66314(d)(10)(A) caps ADU parking at one space per unit or per bedroom, whichever is less, and HCD reads a studio as adding no bedroom, so the one-space rule cannot bind a studio over 500 sq ft. In practice a space is owed only for a local-standards unit with a bedroom outside the exemptions, chiefly a detached unit over 800 sq ft (the code does not say whether an attached addition counts as 'part of' the home under (c)(3)); JADUs need no parking.
TOMC §§ 9-4.4505, 9-4.2402(a)(7), 9-4.4502(b) (Ord. 1747-NS); Gov. Code 66314(d)(10) and (d)(11), 66322(a), 66323(b), 66334(a)No ADU or JADU may be created without a building permit, and applications are reviewed ministerially, without discretionary review or a hearing: the Community Development Department decides completeness within 15 business days (and again within 15 business days of a resubmittal) and approves or denies a complete application within 60 days when a home already exists on the lot (an application filed with a new house may wait for the house permit). Denials must list every deficiency and how to cure it; an incompleteness or denial determination may be appealed within 10 calendar days to the Planning Commission, which decides ministerially without a public hearing within 60 business days, and its decision is final. The residential use matrix lists ADUs as P (no discretionary entitlement) in every residential zone except the TPD mobile home park zone. Applications go through the TO/24 online portal, and the Building Division's July 2026 completeness checklist requires Ventura County Fire Department fire-flow verification and 610B conditions before an application is deemed complete.
TOMC §§ 9-4.4503(a) to (i), 9-4.2103, 9-4.2104 (Ord. 1747-NS); Gov. Code 66317An ADU or JADU may be rented separately from the house but not for a term of 30 days or less, which rules out short-term rentals. For JADUs and state-exempt (66323) units that matches Gov. Code 66333(g) and 66323(e) (terms longer than 30 days); for a local-standards ADU it runs one day past Gov. Code 66315, which lets a city require only terms of 30 days or longer, and the city ADU page describes the rule as 'a minimum term of 30 days', so both texts are recorded while the codified Sec. 9-4.4506(b) states the operative rule. ADUs and JADUs may not be sold or conveyed separately from the house except under Gov. Code 66341 (qualified nonprofit affordable ownership), and the city has not opted into the Gov. Code 66342 ADU-condominium conveyance. The Municipal Code has no short-term rental permit program or rental registry; the 10 percent transient occupancy tax of Chapter 3-14 reaches hotel-type stays of 30 consecutive days or less.
TOMC §§ 9-4.4506(a) and (b), 9-4.4512(c)(2), 3-14.02(d), 3-14.03 (Ord. 1747-NS); Gov. Code 66315, 66323(e), 66333(g), 66341, 66342The fine print: 11 caveats that can change the picture
- Operative text is TOMC Title 9, Chapter 4, Article 45 (Secs. 9-4.4501 to 9-4.4512), created by Ord. 1732-NS (eff. 11-22-2024), amended by Ord. 1735-NS (eff. 4-25-2025) and restated by Ord. 1747-NS (MCA-2025-70003; introduced 2-24-2026 and adopted 3-10-2026, both 5-0; eff. 4-10-2026), codified on American Legal in version 2026 S-78 (city legislation passed through 3-31-2026). Later ordinances (1748-NS filming, 1749-NS Civic Arts Plaza Specific Plan, and 1750-NS for-sale affordable housing fee exemption, on the 9-29-2026 agenda for second reading) do not touch Article 45, and no ADU item appears on Council or Planning Commission agendas through 9-29-2026 or on the Commission's tentative schedule through 11-30-2026.
- HCD's 6-1-2026 findings on Ord. 1747-NS (five items, response due 7-1-2026; HCD's index lists the response as received but its content is not public): counting the one local-standards ADU against the Gov. Code 66323 allowance (HCD: every 66323 unit plus at least one 66314 unit must be allowed), limiting single-family allowances to the listed single-family zones (lots with nonconforming conditions or a house on a multifamily lot), giving multifamily zones only 66323 units, the exterior-stair ban, and owner-occupancy terms in the JADU deed restriction. No amending ordinance has been introduced; Sec. 9-4.4502(b) makes the Government Code prevail over these clauses meanwhile. Re-check HCD's dashboard and the Council record by 2026-12-15.
- State-exempt units: the California Housing Defense Fund's 1-23-2026 comment letter argued that Ord. 1747-NS dropped the 2025 text's exemption of state-exempt units from local standards, and staff's 1-26-2026 memo deleted the last cross-reference distinguishing them ('all ADUs will be permitted with only a building permit'). Whatever the local text says, Gov. Code 66323(b) bars applying the parking rule of Sec. 9-4.4505, the 25 percent slope ban, the front-setback rule, the 6 ft building separation, the 850 sq ft or 50 percent conversion cap and the Sec. 9-4.4510 design standards (matching materials and roof slope, privacy glass, driveway, garage-door and stair rules) to those units, and Gov. Code 66321(b)(3) protects an 800 sq ft unit with 4 ft side and rear setbacks from front-setback and similar limits.
- Chaptered 2026 law: AB 956 (Ch. 791, Stats. 2026, effective 1-1-2027) raises the 66323 exempt-pathway count to two detached new-construction ADUs on a single-family lot (no JADU owed where two exist), overriding the one-unit text of Sec. 9-4.4511(a)(2) from that date; SB 1117 (Ch. 809, Stats. 2026, effective 1-1-2027) limits impact fees on an ADU over 750 sq ft to the area above 750 sq ft, overriding the proportional formula in Sec. 9-4.4508(b). Re-check both on or after 1-1-2027.
- Fees: Sec. 9-4.4508(b) exempts only ADUs 'smaller than' 750 sq ft and charges proportional fees from 750 sq ft, while Gov. Code 66311.5(c)(1) exempts an ADU of 750 sq ft of interior livable space or less, a one-square-foot conflict the state text wins; the city ADU page likewise says units 'less than 750 sq. ft.' are fee-exempt.
- Site limits in the local text: no ADU within or on a natural slope steeper than 25 percent; in the Protected Ridgeline overlay no structure or grading within 300 ft horizontally or 100 ft vertically of a ridgeline crest unless that precludes the minimum units of 800 sq ft (then sited at the lowest elevation); no construction in the protected zone of a protected oak or landmark tree unless that precludes an 800 sq ft unit, in which case the tree may be removed with 1:1 replacement by a 36-inch box Coast Live Oak or Valley Oak or an in-lieu fee; septic lots need State Water Resources Control Board feasibility and a concurrent onsite wastewater application. The Historic Landmark overlay lets the city condition permits to protect a landmark (Sec. 9-4.3403), which for ADUs is limited to objective standards.
- Zones and unit caps: the TPD mobile home park zone does not list ADUs; the MU/MUOZ use matrix (Sec. 9-4.2104.5) omits ADUs although Article 45 names the MU zone and Gov. Code 66323 applies in mixed-use zones; on a lot created by an SB 9 urban lot split at most two units are allowed including ADUs and JADUs, and a two-unit development on an unsplit lot caps the lot at four units including ADUs and JADUs (Secs. 9-4.3706(e), 9-4.3708(b)).
- Stale city materials: the city ADU page (toaks.gov/index.php?section=adu) still says any property with a JADU must be owner-occupied and that ADUs may be rented for a minimum of 30 days, and the July 2025 ADU application PDF cites pre-2026 section numbers (easement limits in 9-4.4505, trees in 9-4.4507(h)(1), parking in 9-4.4508, JADU deed restriction in 9-4.4511); neither is curated. The pre-approved plan gallery sits on a third-party host (thousandoaks.aduaccelerator.org) and is not linked.
- Drafting artifacts in the codified text: Sec. 9-4.4504(a)(1) cross-references 'Section 9-9-4.4511' (the adopted ordinance reads 9-4.4511); Sec. 9-4.4506(c) reads as if a governmental, land trust or housing organization owner must occupy, while Sec. 9-4.4512(c)(1) and Gov. Code 66333(b) state that exception correctly; HCD's 6-1-2026 letter labels the unit-allowance clause Sec. 9-4.4505(a)(1).
- Pending rewrite: the Comprehensive Zoning Code Update (MCA-2025-70001, Lisa Wise Consulting; assessment memo received by the Planning Commission and Council 8-25 and 8-26-2025, code drafting under way) will rewrite all of Chapter 4, Article 45 included; watch the toaks.gov/zoningcode page and Planning Commission schedule.
- Gov. Code 66326(d) exposure: HCD acknowledged receiving Ord. 1747-NS by 6-1-2026 and lists a city response to both findings letters, but no public record dates the ordinance's submittal (due within 60 days of 3-10-2026); nothing indicates the ordinance is void.
Summarized from Thousand Oaks's ordinance text, read October 2026; every row links the code section it came from. Rules often vary by zone and lot, so treat this as orientation, not a permit determination, and confirm with the planning department before you commit to a design.
ADU regulations
- codelibrary.amlegal.comOfficial sourceVerified October 2026https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/thousandoaks/latest/thousandoaks_ca/0-0-0-43539
- hcd.ca.govOfficial sourceVerified October 2026https://www.hcd.ca.gov/sites/default/files/docs/policy-and-research/ordinance-review-letters/thousand-oaks-adu-findings-060126.pdf
California statewide law also applies
California sets baseline ADU rights at the state level. Where local rules are stricter than state law allows, state law usually wins, so both are worth reading.
See California statewide rulesSpotted something outdated?
Zoning codes change. If a link is dead or Thousand Oaks has updated its ordinance, report it and we'll verify against the official source.
Report a correctionReady to build?
Planning an ADU in Thousand Oaks?
Tell us about your project and we'll match you with vetted local designers and builders as we bring them online. No cost, no obligation.